Another dissapointing tear up

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
User avatar
sonny
Cruising
Posts: 10278
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Kent

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by sonny » Mon May 23, 2011 10:41 am

A can of worms springs to mind now buddy lol
Money can't buy you love, but it can buy you a well sorted racecar

User avatar
Ice_Coffee
4th Gear
Posts: 808
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:55 am

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by Ice_Coffee » Mon May 23, 2011 12:15 pm

sonny wrote:A can of worms springs to mind now buddy lol
An expensive can at that, as I am also looking at getting the limitation removed.

adsgreen
Cruising
Posts: 5571
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:54 am

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by adsgreen » Mon May 23, 2011 5:50 pm

Won't make a huge amount of difference if you're still starting in 3rd at 50mph. At 4k rpm you're well off the power band.
In 2nd it's over 5 so not a problem as the throttle limit doesn't come into play..

lengster1
Cruising
Posts: 3052
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:00 pm

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by lengster1 » Mon May 23, 2011 6:08 pm

It does make a very big difference if youve had the lot done,power is in much earlier and much stronger,torque increase is substantial on a car that had the lot done,any doubters should pop to mrc and ask doug nicely for a demo drive of his own b7,its that kind of situation were the mods a very noticeable and the standard car was very poor

yorkie
4th Gear
Posts: 699
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Cambridge UK

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by yorkie » Mon May 23, 2011 8:39 pm

Interesting thread this. Many times I have struggled to keep up or leave cars which I would have expected to overcome easily (not a boy racer incidently) but have always realised after the event I was in the wrong gear. With fuel prices as they are I would guess the majority tend to drive in a higher gear than the optimum for performance which leaves this car at a disadvantage. With peak power at nearly 8k I doubt if there are many who drive it as it was designed most of the time, I know I don't and that is how you get caught out.

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by neckarsulm » Mon May 23, 2011 9:22 pm

I don't think the RS4 was built to have 50mph "tear ups", it's got bigger fish to fry.
Bit like going London to Glasgow on the space shuttle, a Cesna would prob be quicker.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

HYFR
Cruising
Posts: 15568
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:02 pm

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by HYFR » Mon May 23, 2011 9:28 pm

i was blasting round some B roads in my S4 today

it was fast

but the RS 4 would have been just as fast, and sounded better

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by neckarsulm » Mon May 23, 2011 9:41 pm

..and got better MPG :rocker:

sorry DK, I just can't get over how bad the S4 3.0T mpg is when it was designed to replace the 'inefficient' V8, how do you find it?
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

HYFR
Cruising
Posts: 15568
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:02 pm

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by HYFR » Mon May 23, 2011 10:42 pm

LOL

U takin the piss!

If not, iv got 40mpg out of it, twice, over 45miles each time

User avatar
Golfather
Cruising
Posts: 3033
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 10:27 pm
Location: Berks
Contact:

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by Golfather » Tue May 24, 2011 12:26 am

aka_dk wrote:iv got 40mpg out of it...
You would struggle to get that out of a VAG 1.4 TFSI lump, so you must be doing something wrong !

User avatar
guffy
3rd Gear
Posts: 315
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:43 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by guffy » Tue May 24, 2011 12:45 pm

aka_dk wrote:
If not, iv got 40mpg out of it, twice, over 45miles each time
Downhill?

HYFR
Cruising
Posts: 15568
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:02 pm

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by HYFR » Tue May 24, 2011 5:15 pm

golfather wrote:
aka_dk wrote:iv got 40mpg out of it...
You would struggle to get that out of a VAG 1.4 TFSI lump, so you must be doing something wrong !
Image

Image

HYFR
Cruising
Posts: 15568
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:02 pm

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by HYFR » Tue May 24, 2011 5:17 pm

when pushing on, the S4 is just as economical as the V8 S4

but its when cruising, the car is miles ahead of the V8

If I avoid city driving, or twisty B roads , I see north of 30mpg EVERY single journey

so far over 5k, 28.5MPG

PJC
Cruising
Posts: 4736
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 7:40 pm

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by PJC » Tue May 24, 2011 5:22 pm

That is very impressive considering the performance, pity it doesn't handle too.

P_G
Cruising
Posts: 8249
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: Another dissapointing tear up

Post by P_G » Tue May 24, 2011 5:39 pm

It's 5mpg in trade off for V8 sound.....

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 153 guests