Imola S4

4.2 V8 40v Naturally Aspirated - 339bhp
Post Reply
carpy
3rd Gear
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:32 pm

Imola S4

Post by carpy » Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:45 pm

Whats up with this car? Has been advertised for quite a while now. I'm tempted to get into one of these rather than waiting for a modified B5 S4 to come up. I know it's not going to be earth shatteringly quick, but should have a decent amount of grunt shirley?

http://search.autotrader.co.uk/es-uk/ww ... gLetter=04

User avatar
chunky79
Cruising
Posts: 11517
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:51 am
Location: West Mids

Post by chunky79 » Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:40 pm

doesn't look the cleanest inside but outside looks ok. Would be worth a look at that price for sure!
previous- Pug 205 gti, 306 gti, 309 gti Goodwood.
Audi S3, S4 V8 avant.
Porsche Macan Turbo.
Gone but NEVER forgotten - C5 RS6 Misano red avant.

Now - Empty garage

If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there!

carpy
3rd Gear
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:32 pm

Post by carpy » Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:51 pm

Hang on, if these things are 2210kg and about 344bhp, that's a pretty poor power to weight ratio isnt it.

My old volvo was about the same as that!! Not joking either.

User avatar
Pete.S
3rd Gear
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 7:37 am

Post by Pete.S » Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:56 am

The very fact the seller hasn't even bothered to give it a quick hoover and get rid of that dirty great boot mark on the floor mat before photography would put me off straight away.

And check out the state of the exhaust tips! They didn't do black as option on the yellow ones did they? :wink:

User avatar
chunky79
Cruising
Posts: 11517
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:51 am
Location: West Mids

Post by chunky79 » Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:48 am

Pete.S wrote:The very fact the seller hasn't even bothered to give it a quick hoover and get rid of that dirty great boot mark on the floor mat before photography would put me off straight away.

And check out the state of the exhaust tips! They didn't do black as option on the yellow ones did they? :wink:
It does look like the tip's are black all around the outside though! Even a little bit of a clean inside would have made a diffrence
previous- Pug 205 gti, 306 gti, 309 gti Goodwood.
Audi S3, S4 V8 avant.
Porsche Macan Turbo.
Gone but NEVER forgotten - C5 RS6 Misano red avant.

Now - Empty garage

If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there!

User avatar
chunky79
Cruising
Posts: 11517
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:51 am
Location: West Mids

Post by chunky79 » Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:51 am

carpy wrote:Hang on, if these things are 2210kg and about 344bhp, that's a pretty poor power to weight ratio isnt it.

My old volvo was about the same as that!! Not joking either.
Have you been in one of these cars? They don't hang around mate. It would be worth you going in one before considering one. You might think it doesn't fel fast but keep your eye on the speedo and you'll be a little suprised!
previous- Pug 205 gti, 306 gti, 309 gti Goodwood.
Audi S3, S4 V8 avant.
Porsche Macan Turbo.
Gone but NEVER forgotten - C5 RS6 Misano red avant.

Now - Empty garage

If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there!

User avatar
BlingBling
4th Gear
Posts: 669
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:59 am
Location: Bremen, Germany

Post by BlingBling » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:00 am

carpy wrote:Hang on, if these things are 2210kg and about 344bhp, that's a pretty poor power to weight ratio isnt it.

My old volvo was about the same as that!! Not joking either.
The power to weight does seem poor but it is still a very capable car. Also the 2210kg is the fully laden weight, which is not normal driving conditions.

stugolf
Neutral
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:49 am

Post by stugolf » Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:04 pm

I thought S4's weighted about 1,700kgs unladened

User avatar
tweek
2nd Gear
Posts: 206
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:06 pm

Post by tweek » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:14 pm

The avant is 1760kg, the saloon is less at 1660kg unladen. I suspect the reason(s) why it is still on the market is a) running costs and b) the colour. The condition doesn't look too bad considering it has 80,000 miles on it and the price obviously reflects the mileage and condition. Personally I wouldn't buy a car of that colour primarily from a re-sale point of view but it is worth considering that not all people are car fanatics and just use the car i.e. it maybe in good mechanical condition but a little below par on the cosmetic side.

The B6 S4 is a quick car in anybody's book and I suspect maybe more reliable than a modified B5 S4 especially as you may not know the quality of the modifications made unless you do them yourself.

Pete

david7m
Top Gear
Posts: 2117
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 5:52 pm
Location: West Midlands, UK

Post by david7m » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:39 pm

In the technical data on the advert, it lists 0-62pmh as 5.6s, which isn't slow by any means!

Dave
APR 270bhp S3, Mixer K6 750

Cheap performance tip - lie the rear seats flat Image

User avatar
Pete.S
3rd Gear
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 7:37 am

Post by Pete.S » Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:21 pm

tweek wrote:The avant is 1760kg, the saloon is less at 1660kg unladen. I suspect the reason(s) why it is still on the market is a) running costs and b) the colour. The condition doesn't look too bad considering it has 80,000 miles on it and the price obviously reflects the mileage and condition. Personally I wouldn't buy a car of that colour primarily from a re-sale point of view but it is worth considering that not all people are car fanatics and just use the car i.e. it maybe in good mechanical condition but a little below par on the cosmetic side.

The B6 S4 is a quick car in anybody's book and I suspect maybe more reliable than a modified B5 S4 especially as you may not know the quality of the modifications made unless you do them yourself.

Pete
I can't see someone who isn't a car fanatic buying an Imola yellow one though tbh, especially if you're gonna use it as a work horse (as this one obviously has been at 80k). What's weird is, the exterior looks in great nick - clean & he's even polished the tyres - so why let it down by not spending 5 mins on the interior? Odd.

Personally I think S & RS cars look awesome in Imola on the road, but I wouldn't buy one because I think they're a little too "look at me".

The B6 is definitely more reliable than even a standard B5 (I've run both to high mileage), and I agree, in over 4 years of ownership I've never been wanting of more power on public roads. For track use though, that'd be a different story...

HYFR
Cruising
Posts: 15568
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:02 pm

Post by HYFR » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:16 pm

damm it. . . i would have bought that, would have saved me 10k in the process ! always loved the yellow on S / RS models

Merlot
3rd Gear
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 10:34 pm
Location: UK

Post by Merlot » Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:21 pm

I like the colour but the prices of B6 S4's are now weak. Its a saloon, manual, high miles and a hard to shift colour so about right.
Maserati GranTurismo GTS Auto, S3 Sportback, TT2 3.2 Roadster, Disco3 for the heavy stuff.

Spoof
1st Gear
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:54 pm
Location: London

Post by Spoof » Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:02 pm

I've got my 90k miles Goodwood S4 Tip thats immaculate up for £8k now. Prices are so weak, but when you can get an average millage RS6 for £15k these days its about right sadly.

Post Reply

Return to “S4 (B6 Type 8E/8H) 2003-2005 / (B7 Typ 8E/8H) 2005-2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 157 guests