1st Set of Logs

[Philws4]

Quite pleased with these (i think, unless someone says otherwise) any comments???

Not sure how to copy/paste over in excel and keep the columns!!


Group A: '003
Engine Speed Mass Air Flow Throttle Valve Angle Ignition
TIME (G28) (G70) Timing Angle
Marker STAMP /min g/s % °BTDC
0.31 1760 16.64 7.1 28.5
1.21 1800 17.17 7.1 28.5
2.12 1920 55.47 39.6 19.5
3.03 2120 71.03 100 15.8
3.94 2440 107.97 100 11.3
4.84 2880 143.19 100 12
5.75 3320 174.42 100 11.3
6.66 3800 199.56 100 11.3
7.57 4240 216.78 100 11.3
8.53 4720 236.42 100 13.5
9.53 5160 243.33 100 15.8
10.58 5600 256.72 100 17.3
11.65 6000 264.28 100 21.8
12.78 6320 259.56 100 22.5
13.9 6680 262.44 100 26.3
15.04 7000 272.06 100 24
16.17 6480 9.56 6.7 30.8
17.21 5400 17.53 7.1 16.5
18.25 5160 15.97 7.1 15.8
19.23 4800 15.69 6.7 15
20.21 4480 14.19 6.3 13.5
21.14 4160 13.94 5.9 13.5


272.06/0.8=340BHP


Group B: '032
Adaptation (Idle) Adaptation (Partial) Adaptation (Idle) Adaptation (Partial)
TIME Bank 1 Sensor 1 Bank 1 Sensor 1 Bank 2 Sensor 1 Bank 2 Sensor 1
STAMP % % % %
0.61 0.2 -2.3 1.3 0.8
1.52 0.2 -2.3 1.3 0.8
2.42 0.2 -2.3 1.3 0.8
3.33 0.2 -1.6 1.3 0
4.24 0.2 -0.8 1.3 -0.8
5.15 0.2 -0.8 1.3 -0.8
6.05 0.2 -0.8 1.3 -0.8
6.96 0.2 -0.8 1.3 -0.8
7.89 0.2 -0.8 1.3 -0.8
8.86 0.2 -0.8 1.3 -0.8
9.88 0.2 -0.8 1.3 -0.8
10.92 0.2 -0.8 1.3 -0.8
12.03 0.2 -0.8 1.3 -0.8
13.15 0.2 -0.8 1.3 -0.8
14.29 0.2 -0.8 1.3 -0.8
15.42 0.2 -0.8 1.3 -0.8
16.53 0.2 -2.3 1.3 0.8
17.56 0.2 -2.3 1.3 0.8
18.58 0.2 -2.3 1.3 0.8
19.57 0.2 -2.3 1.3 0.8
20.52 0.2 -2.3 1.3 0.8
21.44 0.2 -2.3 1.3 0.8



Group C: '115
Engine Speed Engine Load Boost Pressure Boost Pressure
TIME (G28) (specified) (actual)
STAMP /min % mbar mbar
0.01 1760 31.6 1010 1030
0.91 1800 31.6 1010 1030
1.82 1840 57.9 1010 1020
2.73 2040 99.2 2000 1210
3.63 2320 127.8 1980 1510
4.54 2720 159.4 1950 1830
5.45 3160 178.2 1990 2010
6.35 3640 178.2 2030 1990
7.26 4120 172.9 2010 2000
8.21 4600 172.2 1960 1970
9.19 5040 166.9 1890 1890
10.22 5440 158.6 1900 1840
11.28 5840 154.9 1860 1850
12.39 6240 142.9 1790 1710
13.53 6560 137.6 1770 1720
14.66 6880 133.8 1790 1740
15.78 7200 112 1010 1440
16.88 5440 10.5 1010 1100
17.91 5240 10.5 1010 1080
18.91 4920 10.5 1010 1070
19.88 4600 10.5 1010 1070
20.84 4280 10.5 1010 1060

[GrahamS4]

Is that on just a remap? No exhaust work?

That is impressive.

Did you log in 3rd to get a FATS time?

[Philws4]

Yes just an (Mihnea)MRC custom re-map,demeshed MAF screen,2 new lambda's (fitted today),standard exhaust and some good old shell V-power.

This was all done in 3rd, what do i have to do to get a FATS time??

I am well pleased.

[GrahamS4]

Enter the figures in the calculator on the MRC website is an easy a way as any:

http://www.mrctuning.com/fatsview.php?carselect=B5%20S4

Jealous of the results from just a custom map, based on your MAF reading you are 20BHP over me (MRC custom map too). Maybe mines not run in yet

[Philws4]

It say's at the end 'please fill out time 1b'

WTF

Do i need to log in/join??

[GrahamS4]

No login, not sure what the problem is. Entering your figures (just to the calculator) comes out with 5.853.

Was the road flat?

[Philws4]

As near as i could find but probably a little bit uphill!

Is that a good time?

[Philws4]

Forgot to add that i had 1 passenger (75Kg) a full tank of fuel and the spare wheel in the boot, and the outside temp was 12 Deg.

[GrahamS4]

Take a look in the link above. Times vary but you get an idea.

[Philws4]

Anyone else got any comments on these logs?

Would like to know that timing,boost figs etc are ok!

Will try and do some more in next few days now the fuel is getting lower!

Also how do you post results in the original format i.e with the correct VAG-COM columns??

TIA

[Nige_RS4]

The figures look great, especially the timing, but the FATs times don't really reflect this? You should be seeing low 5 second FATs. Can you log blocks 020 & 021 to see if you are pulling any timing? Maybe it was just the road? Best bet is normally to do two runs in opposite directions on the same road and get a mean figure.

[GrahamS4]

My personal experience is that FATS times can vary quite vastly, same day, same session, same road.

The main difference I found and was really quite surprised was the difference between doing a run having sat playing with the laptop with a warm engine sat idling just literally prior and doing a fats run having previously been driving for a while.

I have read the term heatsoak before but didn't realise the dramatic affect until doing my runs.

[MarkB]

My personal experience is that FATS times can vary quite vastly, same day, same session, same road.

The main difference I found and was really quite surprised was the difference between doing a run having sat playing with the laptop with a warm engine sat idling just literally prior and doing a fats run having previously been driving for a while.

I have read the term heatsoak before but didn't realise the dramatic affect until doing my runs.

I have to agree with you on this. Just been looking through the figures posted. There is such variation. Yes, you can see a marked jump for the K04 cars but checking out the difference between a mapped only and mapped + exhaust etc car is hard.

Timing and MAF figures are a good way of seeing whats going on though...

[Philws4]

Thanks guy's for your comments.
At the weekend i will do some more logs and log blocks 20 & 21.
Totally agree with the heat soak issue this was done after a couple of mins in layby setting up laptop!
Will also have to find a better bit of road as if i reverse my test i will be approaching a slight corner at 100+, so not the best idea!!

Thanks for the replies.