This is Embarrassing - with a capital E...

All things related to Audi and other manufacturers
tartan_rob
Cruising
Posts: 2990
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:45 pm
Location: Swindon, Wilts

This is Embarrassing - with a capital E...

Post by tartan_rob » Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:58 pm

My mate who is a stonch BMW fan but was really tempted with a B7 RS4, until he saw this....

http://www.myvideo.de/watch/874157

I need to be honest, I am rather shocked by the gap that the BMW pulled so quickly.

I know it pretty much comes down to power to weight but why oh why can't Audi make a lightweight version...

Weight(kg) Power/weight (bhp/ton)
E46 M3 1577 220
E46 M3 CSL 1385 260
B5 RS4 1700 224
B7 RS4 1720 (Cabrio 1845..!!) 244
2017 Kawasaki Z1000
2014 RS6
2014 S1

david7m
Top Gear
Posts: 2117
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 5:52 pm
Location: West Midlands, UK

RE: This is Embarrassing - with a capital E...

Post by david7m » Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:04 pm

Do you think its a wind up, or is there really that much difference?

Dave
APR 270bhp S3, Mixer K6 750

Cheap performance tip - lie the rear seats flat Image

User avatar
ZeroK66
Top Gear
Posts: 2249
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:13 pm
Location: Devon, UK

RE: This is Embarrassing - with a capital E...

Post by ZeroK66 » Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:04 pm

That cant be right surely? I thought the RS4 was comfortably quicker?

The CSL is crazy fast in comparison... sure it is not modded? There must be 1/4 times available online somewhere... mind you I suppose that favours the 4wd...
Facelift Imola S4 | Cust K04's, Tubular Manifolds, 3" DPs->2.75" Catback | FMIC | PSS9 Coilovers + ARB's | Brembo 8-Pots | SS + DTS | 5??HP/475lbs/ft | 3.06S FATS on S4 Box

Sold: A4 (B5) 2.8 Quattro | Ivory Pearl
Melted: Corrado - IHI 1.8t: 343BHP

tartan_rob
Cruising
Posts: 2990
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:45 pm
Location: Swindon, Wilts

RE: This is Embarrassing - with a capital E...

Post by tartan_rob » Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:08 pm

The power to weight difference is 16bhp/ton. Which is not a lot and the RS4 may have been new and I think the engine needs to loosen up but my mate seems to think it is a std CSL and having driven his std M3, it felt quite a bit quicker than my S4.

We have to assume that as someone has gone to the hassle of recording several runs, it is probably correct.

PS Like the signature...
2017 Kawasaki Z1000
2014 RS6
2014 S1

tartan_rob
Cruising
Posts: 2990
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:45 pm
Location: Swindon, Wilts

RE: This is Embarrassing - with a capital E...

Post by tartan_rob » Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:12 pm

Online figures:

RS4
0-60 = 4.51
0-100 = 10.91
60-100 = 6.4
1/4 mile = 13.1@109mph

M3 CSL
0-60 = 4.49
0-100 = 10.24
60-100 = 5.75
1/4 mile = 12.74@111mph
2017 Kawasaki Z1000
2014 RS6
2014 S1

tartan_rob
Cruising
Posts: 2990
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:45 pm
Location: Swindon, Wilts

RE: This is Embarrassing - with a capital E...

Post by tartan_rob » Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:13 pm

2017 Kawasaki Z1000
2014 RS6
2014 S1

DavidT
Cruising
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 4:46 pm
Location: Cheshire

RE: This is Embarrassing - with a capital E...

Post by DavidT » Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:28 pm

I would expect the CSL to be slightly quicker because it has a slightly better power to weight ratio and is 2wd.

User avatar
RS4_B7
1st Gear
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 1:51 am
Location: KUWAIT

Post by RS4_B7 » Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:23 pm

around 2 month ago i've raced my frind's M3 CSL with exhaust system , headers , air filter , re-maped ecu on my re-maped RS4 rooling from 70 km/h , on 260 km/h he was behind me aroun 3 to 4 cars and im still going
06' Sprint blue RS4

User avatar
dummi
4th Gear
Posts: 951
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: birmingham

Post by dummi » Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:54 pm

its an ultra light CSL vs. an avant i'd expect the csl to have an advantage with weight, suprised it won at the top end despite though.

User avatar
alex_123_fra
4th Gear
Posts: 649
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:57 pm

Post by alex_123_fra » Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:00 pm

That is not right at all. When I had a modified Evo VIII MR with 380 lb ft and 400 bhp, it just about kept up with a B7 RS4 in a straight line to 100 and then the RS4 pulled away. This is despite the Evo weighing 250kg less (1400kg).

There is no way that CSL is completely standard. In addition, the RS4 doesn't even seem to be trying...you can't hear any noise at all from it !!
Current: C7 RS6 - Black, VW Passat CC R36 - Black, Freelander 2 - Black
Sold: 911 C4S (991) - Black, Panamera Turbo ('11) - Carrera White, Nissan GT-R - DMG, B8 S4 - Phantom Black, B7 RS4 - Daytona grey saloon, Noble M400, Golf R32, Evo VIII MR, M3, Cooper S, Civic Type-R, BMW 120D (black), Mazda 6 MPS

User avatar
john1975
Neutral
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:24 pm

Post by john1975 » Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:14 am

The avant could be under powered like mine! Had my car remapped last week, my avant has the milltek exhaust and hi flow cats on and it was only putting out 364bhp!!!! After the re map it was putting out 392bhp!

User avatar
DaveP
Top Gear
Posts: 1533
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 11:29 pm
Location: North West England

Post by DaveP » Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:29 pm

Hahahahahaaaa....... CSL Wins !
DaveP...
Audi Allroad - Daily slogger
S1 Exige - Track beast

tartan_rob
Cruising
Posts: 2990
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:45 pm
Location: Swindon, Wilts

Post by tartan_rob » Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:33 pm

John1975 - why was your B7 so far under the power figures Audi quote...?
2017 Kawasaki Z1000
2014 RS6
2014 S1

User avatar
john1975
Neutral
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:24 pm

Post by john1975 » Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:51 pm

Tartan_Rob wrote:John1975 - why was your B7 so far under the power figures Audi quote...?

I havent got a clue even the tuner hadnt, he said it was the lowest one he had ever done!!!
In my own mind i was expecting around the 400 mark with the exhaust and hi flow cats, but not 364 it is shocking!! I feel like taking the car back to Audi and saying what are you playing at!!! :audibash:
It seems to go well and it went well on the trackand feels a lot faster than my b6 S4 but even so i am shocked.
He had another avant in which he took me out for a spin in to compare both cars and it felt like there was more urgency in the other car.

Any suggestions?

User avatar
ZeroK66
Top Gear
Posts: 2249
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:13 pm
Location: Devon, UK

Post by ZeroK66 » Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:39 pm

Oh dear, not good john, bit of a problem to take back to Audi now though given the mods.
Facelift Imola S4 | Cust K04's, Tubular Manifolds, 3" DPs->2.75" Catback | FMIC | PSS9 Coilovers + ARB's | Brembo 8-Pots | SS + DTS | 5??HP/475lbs/ft | 3.06S FATS on S4 Box

Sold: A4 (B5) 2.8 Quattro | Ivory Pearl
Melted: Corrado - IHI 1.8t: 343BHP

Post Reply

Return to “General Car Chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests