WorkingRIV wrote:that's a good handing car that is !!!
Gutted couldn't make it![]()
What happened to you?

WorkingRIV wrote:that's a good handing car that is !!!
Gutted couldn't make it![]()
What happened to you?
Gutted!!Working found out I was on call last week ! Chiswick , then Victoria
May well be but the other b8 did over 420 with winter tyres on (more drag it's said). The other thing, his dyno don't do wind down so are these figures whp? Still Doug, mine left you with 430 bhp and 330 lb/ft and after at least 17k miles since last carbon clean it's looking ok and all dyno's read slightly different of courseDoug_S2 wrote:you need the gearbox hot - I bet the more runs you do the power comes up - but then you have to be careful you don't heatsoak the engine and it makes less (proper pita for the turbo cars stopping heatsoak with multiple runs) the b8s usually do 420-440ps on our dyno
I thought it was less 413?May well be but the other b8 did over 420 with winter tyres
measuring rundown is just one more step to remove something that changes - the drivetrain losses with temps etc. someone should have logged every car and then you can justify the power and torque numbers each car does on the dyno.esp_mm-270 wrote:May well be but the other b8 did over 420 with winter tyres on (more drag it's said). The other thing, his dyno don't do wind down so are these figures whp? Still Doug, mine left you with 430 bhp and 330 lb/ft and after at least 17k miles since last carbon clean it's looking ok and all dyno's read slightly different of course
Just looking at ur figures and it's close to 5% different. Conditions? Dyno differences? Any who, add 5% to my result and I'm back to 430kent_andy wrote:Doug, graphs below. It's only done 250 miles since you tweaked it and it's still the same brute, just having to adjust driving style to this weather as it struggles to lay it down.
Makes sense, tyDoug_S2 wrote:measuring rundown is just one more step to remove something that changes - the drivetrain losses with temps etc. someone should have logged every car and then you can justify the power and torque numbers each car does on the dyno.esp_mm-270 wrote:May well be but the other b8 did over 420 with winter tyres on (more drag it's said). The other thing, his dyno don't do wind down so are these figures whp? Still Doug, mine left you with 430 bhp and 330 lb/ft and after at least 17k miles since last carbon clean it's looking ok and all dyno's read slightly different of course
Plate straight, camera angel?is it just my dodgy camera work, or is the plate slightly wonky
Roughly how long since it was driven before that?RIV wrote:Car was just ticking over for 5 mins before run
Around 1 hourRIV wrote:
Car was just ticking over for 5 mins before run
Roughly how long since it was driven before that?
Posted the wrong pic for a few seconds, then corrected it!RIV wrote:Plate straight, camera angel?is it just my dodgy camera work, or is the plate slightly wonky
Few!! Thought I had lost the plotPosted the wrong pic for a few seconds, then corrected it!
Yeah, still on fresh Momentum99, although had some VPower through the system previously (should have been long gone by the run, though, as emptied the tank right down then filled it with momentum and drove it for 150-odd miles a couple days prior to the run).Doug_S2 wrote:charge coolers need to be super cool to start with or big power differences - still on same fuel? Charlie gets similar numbers to our on the b8s so something not right - and you didn't rev to 7200 limiter.TechNick wrote:445HP vs. 490PS for me, but clearly not running at its best, judging by the air coming out of the back during the run.kent_andy wrote:Dyno comparison wise i was 2% down compared to my Mrc run just before Xmas.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests