AMD vs MRC

4.0 V8 40v biturbo TFSI - 553 bhp
4.0 V8 40v biturbo TFSI - 597 bhp (Performance)
User avatar
Iain
4th Gear
Posts: 813
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 5:13 pm
Location: Cardiff

AMD vs MRC

Post by Iain » Sun Jul 17, 2016 8:40 am

Guys

I'm sure its been discussed before; anyone with direct experience of both - its time for a remap me thinks....

Also reference exhaust - I have the sports one fitted - is it worth taking out the cats, leaving the pre cats in, which I assume will release some extra bhp, or just ditch it for a Miltek?

Loving the car.....
Attachments
FullSizeRender.jpg
IMG_6073.JPG
IMG_6074.JPG
2018 Brabus G63 Widestar
2017 RS6 PE -Nardo, Air, HUD, Pan.....Millie Non Res
2015 RS6 - with Added Milltek
2015 RRS - utter sh1te
2010 X5 4.0D M Sport Every conceivable extra
2010 X5 4.0D M Sport
2009 R8 V10 Manual
2004 Lambo Gallarado Manual
3 x 997 C4S / C2s
2003 Fezza 360 Spider - Airfix kit build quality
2007 M3 - car number 2 in the UK
2006 RS4 Avant
2000 RS4 MTM Stage 3 - R55 BYE
2001 RS4 - R500 FOR
1990 Dimma Cosworth H20 COS
2003 996 DMS Turbo
multiple 205's Dimmas

marc1
Cruising
Posts: 3289
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:46 pm

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by marc1 » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:38 am

Had both maps (not C7). Have had several MRC maps and hands down much better. It's not even the power output that is important, it's the driveability.

Leo-RS
3rd Gear
Posts: 352
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:48 pm
Location: Dundee / Aberdeen

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by Leo-RS » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:51 am

No experience with AMD but have known a few that have went down that path (on other VAG cars) with no complaints. Not aware of anyone with the AMD tune on the RS6 though, MRC pretty much has the market for the RS cars.

Reference exhausts, my advice would be the full Milltek, you can't gut the standard downpipes without cutting and welding them so you're best off with an aftermarket decat solution. The cats in the downpipes need to go if you're after the power, they release around 50hp with the Stage 2 tune. Milltek have designed their system so that you can't just buy their downpipes and mate it to the rest of the standard exhaust system so you either have to buy their catback section to mate with their downpipes or visit an exhaust Shop that can bodge the 2 together. I would go down the full system though to allow the extra flow. The standard system is fairly restrictive at 2 x 2.25, the Milltek opens this up to 2 x 2.75 all the way through. This allows for better flow and better heat management. Of course you'll also open up the sound of the exhaust too. You can get a resonated or a non resonated centre section. The non resonated is loud, let's say 100% noise, the resonated is still loud but at around 85%. I chose the resonated section and no complaints, it's loud, deep and purposeful and loud enough for my ears.

There's two options for the downpipes, a 3 inch cerakote coated and a 2.76 inch uncoated. The 3 inch downpipes are about twice the price of the 2.76 inch downpipes. £1400 vs £700 ish. Arguably the 3 inch downpipes will be better but unless going for big power applications, Stage 3 hybrid or big turbo then I think they are overkill. They have to be brought down to 2 x 2.76" anyway to mate with the rest of Milltek's system. No need for the fancy coating unless you're boosting big numbers either. I chose the 2.76 inch downpipes and have been running them fine no probs. You can get the catback section for around £15-1750 I think depending on which version.

Stage 1, software only around 680-700hp
Stage 2, software and full exhaust around 740-750hp

Think that's about it.
MY16 Audi RS6

User avatar
Iain
4th Gear
Posts: 813
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 5:13 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by Iain » Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:14 am

Thanks for the replies and a very comprehensive answer on the exhaust - will opt for a stage 1 and a miltek me thinks.... :bigwave:
2018 Brabus G63 Widestar
2017 RS6 PE -Nardo, Air, HUD, Pan.....Millie Non Res
2015 RS6 - with Added Milltek
2015 RRS - utter sh1te
2010 X5 4.0D M Sport Every conceivable extra
2010 X5 4.0D M Sport
2009 R8 V10 Manual
2004 Lambo Gallarado Manual
3 x 997 C4S / C2s
2003 Fezza 360 Spider - Airfix kit build quality
2007 M3 - car number 2 in the UK
2006 RS4 Avant
2000 RS4 MTM Stage 3 - R55 BYE
2001 RS4 - R500 FOR
1990 Dimma Cosworth H20 COS
2003 996 DMS Turbo
multiple 205's Dimmas

RIV
Cruising
Posts: 5122
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:27 pm

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by RIV » Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:15 am

I wouldn't take any of my cars to AMD
too many bad stories from the b7 days, I'm not going to say anymore. MRC all the way

User avatar
pule333
5th Gear
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by pule333 » Sun Jul 17, 2016 12:50 pm

Had both MRC and AMD on my A4 2.0t. Preferred AMD over all. Had my A1 mapped at AMD. No complains! Had my RS4 b7 mapped at AMD, no complains! But would like to try MRC tune for comparison..
ilya, photographer http://www.ikrylov.com

RS4 B7 aka Vinnie
AMD stage2|De-coked|GruppeM|CAF|Eibach arbs|BilsteinB14|Goodridge hoses|DS3000|phaeton brake ducts|Led tail lights|Trups DTRL|LED interior|JcWeldFab|034 motorsport endlinks, mounts and bushings|ECS Differential Mount|JHM short shift|JHM intake spacers|8/10mm H&R|R2D2 10" sub and AMP|Corbeau seats|4point harness

Leo-RS
3rd Gear
Posts: 352
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:48 pm
Location: Dundee / Aberdeen

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by Leo-RS » Sun Jul 17, 2016 1:08 pm

Iain, if you go for the full Milltek, it will be a Stage 2 tune. If you go for just the catback Milltek (so no power gain, only noise) it will be a Stage 1.

Both are the same price anyway as far as I know, it's just dependent on the exhaust setup :thumbs:
MY16 Audi RS6

User avatar
Iain
4th Gear
Posts: 813
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 5:13 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by Iain » Sun Jul 17, 2016 3:56 pm

Cheers Leo - Didn't know that reference Stage 2 - was just going to go catback.
2018 Brabus G63 Widestar
2017 RS6 PE -Nardo, Air, HUD, Pan.....Millie Non Res
2015 RS6 - with Added Milltek
2015 RRS - utter sh1te
2010 X5 4.0D M Sport Every conceivable extra
2010 X5 4.0D M Sport
2009 R8 V10 Manual
2004 Lambo Gallarado Manual
3 x 997 C4S / C2s
2003 Fezza 360 Spider - Airfix kit build quality
2007 M3 - car number 2 in the UK
2006 RS4 Avant
2000 RS4 MTM Stage 3 - R55 BYE
2001 RS4 - R500 FOR
1990 Dimma Cosworth H20 COS
2003 996 DMS Turbo
multiple 205's Dimmas

User avatar
MikeFish
Cruising
Posts: 15588
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: The Middle of Somewhere

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by MikeFish » Sun Jul 17, 2016 8:26 pm

Pule333 wrote:Had both MRC and AMD on my A4 2.0t. Preferred AMD over all. Had my A1 mapped at AMD. No complains! Had my RS4 b7 mapped at AMD, no complains! But would like to try MRC tune for comparison..
The MRC and AMD maps are like night and day difference on the B7, you are missing out on so much with that AMD map.

There's only one place I'd take my C7 for a remap, and that's MRC.

User avatar
pule333
5th Gear
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by pule333 » Sun Jul 17, 2016 8:28 pm

MikeFish wrote:
Pule333 wrote:Had both MRC and AMD on my A4 2.0t. Preferred AMD over all. Had my A1 mapped at AMD. No complains! Had my RS4 b7 mapped at AMD, no complains! But would like to try MRC tune for comparison..
The MRC and AMD maps are like night and day difference on the B7, you are missing out on so much with that AMD map.

There's only one place I'd take my C7 for a remap, and that's MRC.
I need to test it somehow :)
ilya, photographer http://www.ikrylov.com

RS4 B7 aka Vinnie
AMD stage2|De-coked|GruppeM|CAF|Eibach arbs|BilsteinB14|Goodridge hoses|DS3000|phaeton brake ducts|Led tail lights|Trups DTRL|LED interior|JcWeldFab|034 motorsport endlinks, mounts and bushings|ECS Differential Mount|JHM short shift|JHM intake spacers|8/10mm H&R|R2D2 10" sub and AMP|Corbeau seats|4point harness

User avatar
MikeFish
Cruising
Posts: 15588
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: The Middle of Somewhere

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by MikeFish » Sun Jul 17, 2016 8:37 pm

Just read the previous threads discussing this where people have had the amd map then gone to mrc and really pleased with how much better the mrc map was.

User avatar
pule333
5th Gear
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by pule333 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:17 am

MikeFish wrote:Just read the previous threads discussing this where people have had the amd map then gone to mrc and really pleased with how much better the mrc map was.
Reading is one thing, feeling it is another...
I mean I am very happy with my AMD stage2 file. But don't fancy spending £600+ just to test MRC.
If anyone with MRC st2 keen to put this to the test, I am all ears :)
ilya, photographer http://www.ikrylov.com

RS4 B7 aka Vinnie
AMD stage2|De-coked|GruppeM|CAF|Eibach arbs|BilsteinB14|Goodridge hoses|DS3000|phaeton brake ducts|Led tail lights|Trups DTRL|LED interior|JcWeldFab|034 motorsport endlinks, mounts and bushings|ECS Differential Mount|JHM short shift|JHM intake spacers|8/10mm H&R|R2D2 10" sub and AMP|Corbeau seats|4point harness

User avatar
MikeFish
Cruising
Posts: 15588
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: The Middle of Somewhere

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by MikeFish » Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:29 am

Pule333 wrote:
MikeFish wrote:Just read the previous threads discussing this where people have had the amd map then gone to mrc and really pleased with how much better the mrc map was.
Reading is one thing, feeling it is another...
I mean I am very happy with my AMD stage2 file. But don't fancy spending £600+ just to test MRC.
If anyone with MRC st2 keen to put this to the test, I am all ears :)
Or you could ignore the recommendations and spend the rest of your RS4 ownership missing out on the best driving mod.

User avatar
pule333
5th Gear
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by pule333 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:30 am

MikeFish wrote:
Pule333 wrote:
MikeFish wrote:Just read the previous threads discussing this where people have had the amd map then gone to mrc and really pleased with how much better the mrc map was.
Reading is one thing, feeling it is another...
I mean I am very happy with my AMD stage2 file. But don't fancy spending £600+ just to test MRC.
If anyone with MRC st2 keen to put this to the test, I am all ears :)
Or you could ignore the recommendations and spend the rest of your RS4 ownership missing out on the best driving mod.
Have you driven a car with AMD tune yourself Mike?
ilya, photographer http://www.ikrylov.com

RS4 B7 aka Vinnie
AMD stage2|De-coked|GruppeM|CAF|Eibach arbs|BilsteinB14|Goodridge hoses|DS3000|phaeton brake ducts|Led tail lights|Trups DTRL|LED interior|JcWeldFab|034 motorsport endlinks, mounts and bushings|ECS Differential Mount|JHM short shift|JHM intake spacers|8/10mm H&R|R2D2 10" sub and AMP|Corbeau seats|4point harness

User avatar
MikeFish
Cruising
Posts: 15588
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: The Middle of Somewhere

Re: AMD vs MRC

Post by MikeFish » Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:34 am

No, but ive read enough to know that the amd tine doesnt have the same Sport mode that the MRC one does. Listen to people that have driven both. Happy to let you drive mine if it was still around. 10 seconds in sport mode is all you need.

Post Reply

Return to “RS6 (C7 Typ 4G) 2013-2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests