Facelift differences

4.0 V8 40v biturbo TFSI - 553 bhp
4.0 V8 40v biturbo TFSI - 597 bhp (Performance)
User avatar
MikeFish
Cruising
Posts: 15588
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: The Middle of Somewhere

Re: Facelift differences

Post by MikeFish » Tue Feb 21, 2017 9:57 pm

Ah Ok. There was talk about other differences not just a map, but I don't think I've seen anything official that has stated what the actual engine differences are. Clearly the normal engine / cooling / exhaust is easily capable of reliably producing 605ps and 750NM.

User avatar
skirs6
5th Gear
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:31 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: Facelift differences

Post by skirs6 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 8:42 pm

I would have thought the extra bhp would have come from a map tweak ??

User avatar
MikeFish
Cruising
Posts: 15588
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: The Middle of Somewhere

Re: Facelift differences

Post by MikeFish » Wed Feb 22, 2017 8:46 pm

skirs6 wrote:
Wed Feb 22, 2017 8:42 pm
I would have thought the extra bhp would have come from a map tweak ??
That's the most popular thought (and most likely); a slight increase in boost for the extra bhp and an overboost facility to give an extra 50NM shen needed. Others have talked about different compression ratios and different engine parts and I think better cooling. But I don't think Audi have ever said exactly what the differences are.

wildbore
4th Gear
Posts: 659
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:29 pm
Location: Surrey

Re: Facelift differences

Post by wildbore » Wed Feb 22, 2017 11:46 pm

MikeFish wrote:
Wed Feb 22, 2017 8:46 pm
skirs6 wrote:
Wed Feb 22, 2017 8:42 pm
I would have thought the extra bhp would have come from a map tweak ??
That's the most popular thought (and most likely); a slight increase in boost for the extra bhp and an overboost facility to give an extra 50NM shen needed. Others have talked about different compression ratios and different engine parts and I think better cooling. But I don't think Audi have ever said exactly what the differences are.
Logic says that, if there were mechanical differences, Audi would make something out of that in the press releases and - certainly - the technical briefings that accompanied the PE launch. Which manufacturer wouldn't jump on an "increased bore", "longer stroke" or "bigger turbo" line? Instead, the technical briefing merely stated an overboost.

The proof, though, is in the specifications - both cars emit the same CO2 and have the same fuel economy. If there was even a marginal change in the physical spec of the engine, it would show there.

mfurse
Neutral
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:19 am

Facelift differences

Post by mfurse » Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:21 am

.

User avatar
longman h
4th Gear
Posts: 797
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 7:07 pm
Location: Northern Kent

Re: Facelift differences

Post by longman h » Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:07 am

mfurse wrote:.
Hmm... Good point.
Daytona Grey C6 RS6 Avant
Ebony Black C5 RS6 Plus - Gone

User avatar
Bit_evl
3rd Gear
Posts: 286
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 4:20 pm

Re: Facelift differences

Post by Bit_evl » Thu Feb 23, 2017 2:14 pm

Is the confusion here because someone is mixing up FaceLift (FL) with the Performance Model (only available on FL cars) ?
PreFL were 560bhp as was the PostFL normal models.
PostFL you could also order the Performance Edition which had a 600bhp tweak plus interior and exterior trim changes.

I believe the engine spec (part code) is the same with a mild map change at the high end.
This allows the fairly useless govmnt MPG and Co2 figures to remain the same as these don't stretch the revs etc.

Post Reply

Return to “RS6 (C7 Typ 4G) 2013-2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests