Carbon clean

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
RIV
Cruising
Posts: 5122
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:27 pm

Re: Carbon clean

Post by RIV » Sun Feb 23, 2014 10:34 pm

I just took it out the garage today for a fiddle and put it back in when it started to rain, I can guarantee it'll be a bit smoky when I start it again. I usually make an excuse to take it out if I start it, not running it up to temperature must contribute to carbon build up.
Mine always did this from nearly new, if you just start it up to move a few feet then stop, when you start again you get a puff of smoke, I would say that's just normal for a b7. Nothing to worry about

jaysrs4
5th Gear
Posts: 1116
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:23 pm

Re: Carbon clean

Post by jaysrs4 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:01 am

Silas wrote:
I just took it out the garage today for a fiddle and put it back in when it started to rain, I can guarantee it'll be a bit smoky when I start it again. I usually make an excuse to take it out if I start it, not running it up to temperature must contribute to carbon build up.
Mine always did this from nearly new, if you just start it up to move a few feet then stop, when you start again you get a puff of smoke, I would say that's just normal for a b7. Nothing to worry about
I'm inclined to agree. I've had valve stem oil seal issues on cars before and they also smoked on the overrun too. CVH motors being the worst!
Image

User avatar
sakimano
5th Gear
Posts: 1365
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada

Re: Carbon clean

Post by sakimano » Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:26 am

adsgreen wrote: Based on the research and reading of the problem over the years, it's very common for a "significant" amount of coke to return within 1k miles.
.
1k miles is a bit of a stretch, no? For example in the US two guys installing an APR supercharger on a car that was cleaned 5k miles ago said there was 'barely any' when they took the manifold off. They have seen dozens of cars photos and in person so they have a good idea what the various levels of carbon look like.

A slight coating, sure. But significant? As in causing a significant loss in power or causing a significant amount of blockage? I have seen nothing to support that

adsgreen
Cruising
Posts: 5571
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:54 am

Re: Carbon clean

Post by adsgreen » Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:03 am

Just basing in what I've read in the past - I'm sure different cars used differently will coke at different rates. Maybe some had other underlying issues such as an undiagnosed oil separator fault? Who knows.
The key point is not the exact number when coking returns but that it does relatively quickly and the problem isn't terminal. It'll just plateau at a certain point.

sckrs4
2nd Gear
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:42 pm

Re: Carbon clean

Post by sckrs4 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:33 am

adsgreen wrote:
sync24 wrote:
sachi wrote:What will happen if you don't do the carbon cleanup? Would the engine pack up around 100k miles?

The pictures look a real mess! Is this the entire Audi fsi range?

Shouldn't Audi spend a bit more on R&D to come up with a fix?

Has anyone approached Audi UK directly on this issue?

~
The engine won't pack up - the engine will just gradually go down on power/efficiency to a point that it will go into limp mode.
If your car has 100K on the clock and has never had a carbon clean I would strongly recommend that you get it done - the difference it makes is like night versus day - The usual suspects, MRC, AMD, Unit 20 & Revolution all offer a service to get it done in a day - around £500 - I consider it to be an annual service task

There is no fix for it - it's a design flaw with the FSI engines as there is no actual fuel flowing over the valves - It just seems to be that the 4.2 V8 suffers more from it
Not sure I agree with this. Based on the research and reading of the problem over the years, it's very common for a "significant" amount of coke to return within 1k miles.
Based on that if the problem wasn't self limiting then all engines would be dead within 20-30k miles but that's simply not the case.
I was says the crud builds up to a point then it isn't strong enough to cope with the airflow into the engine and small bits break up and are burnt off. it also explains why being a little hard on the engine with occasional full power runs does in fact reduce the problem if not eliminate it.
You can see this if you dyno a car that's been city driving a lot as you actually see sparks coming out of the exhaust as the revs build.
--

Yes this makes sense. So in a nutshell, de-coke the engine at 70K would be good to have done, but not mandatory.

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 344 guests