bam_bam wrote:8.66 second is impressive, mine does it in 9.0 dead. 0-60 in 4.0 dead with a 1500 launch. Rule VBOX'd.
its the 4 sec dead 0-60 the prob for me , did u use esp .. i assume not ?
bam_bam wrote:8.66 second is impressive, mine does it in 9.0 dead. 0-60 in 4.0 dead with a 1500 launch. Rule VBOX'd.
Why is it a problem for you?robwight wrote:bam_bam wrote:8.66 second is impressive, mine does it in 9.0 dead. 0-60 in 4.0 dead with a 1500 launch. Rule VBOX'd.
its the 4 sec dead 0-60 the prob for me , did u use esp .. i assume not ?
Why do you need to compare to others? Do you have to own the fastest rs6 or something?robwight wrote:ant1 wrote:Did I see that right, 3rd gear before 60mph?
yeah ur right..spun to much 1st & 2nd ..was generally a <beep> 0-60 tbh ,1st attempt.
would like to see some comparible statistics of guys on here ?
could we have a sticky of real world genuine attempts of various 0-100 1/4 mile etc ( no guesses & nonesense )
just a post with relatively accurate proof and times with no debating on tyres / manhood / radio staions etc
would be great general reading & genuinely interesting , and a put up or shut up lol
always good for a banter within the laws of physics on sub threads
robbo
Turn ESP off.robwight wrote:bam_bam wrote:8.66 second is impressive, mine does it in 9.0 dead. 0-60 in 4.0 dead with a 1500 launch. Rule VBOX'd.
its the 4 sec dead 0-60 the prob for me , did u use esp .. i assume not ?
Come and make me, keyboard warrior. My neck isn't out at all. I was asking questions, you in the other hand are just a tool. How come you are still posting on here anyway?bakustax wrote:Wind your neck in Chunk...unless you want the forum to be exclusive to yourself chemo boy and the moronic Aussie...
Ha ha...I'm no keyboard warrior...I'm only pointing out that the forum is for everyone...and all should be made welcome...you and your "buddy's" are becoming extremely tiresome with your higher than mighty attitude...ps if you are serious with your "come and make me" comment...no problem...name the time and placechunky79 wrote:Come and make me, keyboard warrior. My neck isn't out at all. I was asking questions, you in the other hand are just a tool. How come you are still posting on here anyway?bakustax wrote:Wind your neck in Chunk...unless you want the forum to be exclusive to yourself chemo boy and the moronic Aussie...
Unfortunately video isn't proof, Vbox is king. You'd be very surprised at what the Vbox says versus a video, especially a camera phone.robwight wrote:Amar wrote:Sorry, but the time can’t really be regarded as anywhere near accurate, it could be 2-3 seconds out (not to mention the speedo over reads), and that doesn’t sound like much, right? But 2-3 seconds is the difference between an RS 6 and a hot hatch in a 0-60 run. Say another 3 seconds in the 0-100 time.
If you really want to know your 0-60, 0-100 times, buy/borrow/beg/steal a VBox, mate.
3 seconds ? really.. c,mon mate lol thats silly .. its there in HD
i know it isnt accurate as in tenths of seconds,i have said that already.
even taking the speedo is a massive exaggerated 10 % out.. ratio of 60-100 is there ( 54-90 ) IF speedo is 10% out like everyone elses..
ive nothing to prove and a humble guy,hence i videod proof rather than talk <beep> like some people do..
in your opinion it could be 3 seconds out,in your opinion it could even be 5,6 or even 10 seconds out whatever you say mate,but its not.
0-100 8.6 is there , black n white ( well colour actually ) ,60-100mph in 4 seconds is there in colour too ,and would be easily bettered with less people in the car and a better driver
i was chuffed with 8.6 , but i know for a fact its quicker than that..
If you are getting tired of my posts, block me as most have done with you.bakustax wrote:Ha ha...I'm no keyboard warrior...I'm only pointing out that the forum is for everyone...and all should be made welcome...you and your "buddy's" are becoming extremely tiresome with your higher than mighty attitude...ps if you are serious with your "come and make me" comment...no problem...name the time and placechunky79 wrote:Come and make me, keyboard warrior. My neck isn't out at all. I was asking questions, you in the other hand are just a tool. How come you are still posting on here anyway?bakustax wrote:Wind your neck in Chunk...unless you want the forum to be exclusive to yourself chemo boy and the moronic Aussie...
Ha ha...vague and non committal...what a surprise.chunky79 wrote:Time and place. Next week, Birmingham.
Child.bakustax wrote:Ha ha...vague and non committal...what a surprise.chunky79 wrote:Time and place. Next week, Birmingham.
Brilliantchunky79 wrote:Child.bakustax wrote:Ha ha...vague and non committal...what a surprise.chunky79 wrote:Time and place. Next week, Birmingham.
Someone is fighting cancer with chemotherapy and you call him a chemo boy?bakustax wrote:Wind your neck in Chunk...unless you want the forum to be exclusive to yourself chemo boy and the moronic Aussie...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests