Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Post by **Jules** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:00 am

Looking really nice mate.love these in black when there clean

Post by **ArthurPE** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:55 pm

looking good
maintenance and upkeep is the key, should be looking just as good at 150k

Post by **j1sgo** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:27 pm

Looks Mint, not usually a fan of aftermarket rear lights but yours really suit well

, think its the fact you cant see the black outline against the body colour.

Post by **PJC** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:28 pm

Looking good, black does look fantastic after a good clean.

Post by **TimDogg** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:53 pm

Sorry Klauster - didn't see the milltek - my bad (iphone screen too small!)

(Sprint Blue is the fastest colour - everyone knows that, but black looks more 'Ronin')

Post by **ArthurPE** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:06 pm

TimDogg wrote:Sorry Klauster - didn't see the milltek - my bad (iphone screen too small!)

(Sprint Blue is the fastest colour - everyone knows that, but black looks more 'Ronin')

Albert Einstein said yellow was the fastest colour

and although they recently tried to prove him wrong, ie, relativity and speed of light (CERN neutrino speed measurments) they forgot one thing...relativity, the thing they were trying to disprove!
when the measurements are adjusted for the relative speeds of the earth positions and the satellite positions, the 60 nano-sec difference is adjusted by 64 nano-sec, making the speed less than the c (speed of light)

Post by **wellzieRS4** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:18 pm

<beep> me arthur you are wasted on this forum

Post by **Rick_RS4** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:02 pm

ArthurPE wrote:
TimDogg wrote:Sorry Klauster - didn't see the milltek - my bad (iphone screen too small!)

(Sprint Blue is the fastest colour - everyone knows that, but black looks more 'Ronin')
Albert Einstein said yellow was the fastest colour

and although they recently tried to prove him wrong, ie, relativity and speed of light (CERN neutrino speed measurments) they forgot one thing...relativity, the thing they were trying to disprove!
when the measurements are adjusted for the relative speeds of the earth positions and the satellite positions, the 60 nano-sec difference is adjusted by 64 nano-sec, making the speed less than the c (speed of light)

my dads stronger than yours

Post by **P_G** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:05 pm

Are ye callin me pint ugly like?

Post by **DazN** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 8:09 am

Are you looking at my bra?

Post by **ArthurPE** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:51 pm

wellzieRS4 wrote:f*ck me arthur you are wasted on this forum

I'm just plain wasted (on occasion)

Post by **klauster** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:30 pm

sigh....

Pick the car up after service, only to discover nothing has been done regarding the bumper, such a simple instruction, explained and illustrated the issue using another RS4 parked in the car park, plus photos on my phone, service guy completely agreed with me and said it would be sorted...

yet it wasn't, Service Manager involved... now need to book it in again... do Audi Dealerships not understand that booking into a dealership is an inconvenience?

Post by **PetrolDave** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 6:48 pm

klauster wrote:do Audi Dealerships not understand that booking into a dealership is an inconvenience?

Sadly most of them don't seem to understand that

Post by **ArthurPE** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:23 pm

Rick_RS4 wrote:
ArthurPE wrote: my dads stronger than yours

hope so, mine's dead (20 years on)

Post by **ArthurPE** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:25 pm

klauster wrote:... do Audi Dealerships not understand that booking into a dealership is an inconvenience?

it's a matter of perspective
it's not an inconvenience for them, it's normal business, they get paid by you or Audi (if warranty)

it is inconvenient for you, but that appears lost on them

RS246.com Forum :: The World's #1 Audi R, S and RS Enthusiast Community

Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Re: Not bad for 5+ years old and 76k on the clock

Who is online