munched engine...ouch! not for the faint of heart

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:40 pm

Sims wrote:
:lol: You claim "not according to Audi" but yet again don't really know do you. Audi does not need you to defend them, in fact you are harming them - they will step up to the plate when they have to as they have done before.
that was several months ago, I had just heard the rumor, in fact via you, iirc
or that other stuff you posted you said was from Audi re: deposits, that wasn't...and the production changes to the RS4 engine

I sent it to them...I told you I was going to...
they said it was all not true, including the oil temp variation and the purported RS4 changes during it's production run...

remember the post?
stating the RS5 engine was different internally? and had 'fixed' the deposit issue?
from someone you said represents Audi
they beg to differ
Last edited by ArthurPE on Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:41 pm

ArthurPE wrote:
Sims wrote:
ArthurPE wrote:
I have more faith in Audi's answers anyways, thanks
Where are Audi's answers?
I suggest you ask them ;)
you wouldn't believe me anyways, so go to the 'well'
I don't need to, but challenge your another one of baseless assertions.

the coking is a consequence of the scoring, not vice versa...
many borescopes have been performed by Audi on RS4's (at least in the US) and coking is not an issue..

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:43 pm

ArthurPE wrote:
Sims wrote:
:lol: You claim "not according to Audi" but yet again don't really know do you. Audi does not need you to defend them, in fact you are harming them - they will step up to the plate when they have to as they have done before.
that was several months ago, I had just heard the rumor, in fact via you, iirc
or that other stuff you posted you said was from Audi re: deposits, that wasn't...and the production changes to the RS4 engine

I sent it to them...I told you I was going to...
they said it was all not true, including the oil temp variation and the purported RS4 changes during it's production run...

remember the post?
stating the RS5 engine was different internally? and had 'fixed' the deposit issue?
from someone you said represents Audi
they beg to differ
OK, so how do they differ?

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:44 pm

Sims wrote: I don't need to, but challenge your another one of baseless assertions.

the coking is a consequence of the scoring, not vice versa...
many borescopes have been performed by Audi on RS4's (at least in the US) and coking is not an issue..
it's true
many engines (RS4) HAVE been borescoped, in the US
and piston crown cokin is not an issue (any more than any other car)
I've talked to people who had it done
I've talked to a tech who DID it...
and confirmed by other sources

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:45 pm

Sims wrote: OK, so how do they differ?
they don't internally...

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:52 pm

dinner time
some jazz, maybe Art Farmer
and read about my next car
R8 or RS5
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe...Albert Einstein

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:45 am

I see one possible change internally for the RS5
(might be a typo)
but if not, I think I know why they did it...
displacement is identical
bore & stroke identical
V angle identical
cylinder spacing and centerline identical

User avatar
S2tuner
Trader (Expired)
Posts: 1559
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Post by S2tuner » Tue Aug 03, 2010 4:15 am

ArthurPE wrote:
S2tuner wrote: I think instead of posting as many swear words you should have spent a bit longer to check your sources and double check the fact that Porsche do NOT use DI on any GT engine, be it GT2, GT3, GT3RS, or GT2RS. Only the 997TT and the Carreras get it, as well as the Caymans/Boxsters and Cayennes, but NO GT2/3 engine has DI as of yet.
really?

2008
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/30/no-s ... ect-injec/

now
check out their wesite
Since when has a 2008 article on Autoblog been a reliable source of information? Check out www.6speedonline.com where people have already taken brand new 3.8l GT3s and 997 GT2s apart, they both use the legendary GT1 engine still, not the japanese 9A1 DFI engine. The turbo and turbo S however do use DFI indeed. You can go on and call me a fool, but check your information more accurately, heck, you don't have any friends at Porsche NA? :lol:

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:19 am

ArthurPE wrote:I see one possible change internally for the RS5
(might be a typo)
but if not, I think I know why they did it...
displacement is identical
bore & stroke identical
V angle identical
cylinder spacing and centerline identical
So your final answer is that it is the exact same engine? :lol:

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:30 am

ArthurPE wrote:
it's true
many engines (RS4) HAVE been borescoped, in the US
and piston crown cokin is not an issue (any more than any other car)
I've talked to people who had it done
I've talked to a tech who DID it...
and confirmed by other sources
At the outset you said you wanted to keep this thread "technical". How do all the above statements fit into that? Serious question. Let's have more information please.

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:18 am

S2tuner wrote:
ArthurPE wrote:
S2tuner wrote: I think instead of posting as many swear words you should have spent a bit longer to check your sources and double check the fact that Porsche do NOT use DI on any GT engine, be it GT2, GT3, GT3RS, or GT2RS. Only the 997TT and the Carreras get it, as well as the Caymans/Boxsters and Cayennes, but NO GT2/3 engine has DI as of yet.
really?

2008
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/30/no-s ... ect-injec/

now
check out their wesite
Since when has a 2008 article on Autoblog been a reliable source of information? Check out www.6speedonline.com where people have already taken brand new 3.8l GT3s and 997 GT2s apart, they both use the legendary GT1 engine still, not the japanese 9A1 DFI engine. The turbo and turbo S however do use DFI indeed. You can go on and call me a fool, but check your information more accurately, heck, you don't have any friends at Porsche NA? :lol:
AFAIK the Gen 2 997 GT3's have DFI, and most likely the 997 GT2 RS will also have it for that's the way it's going..

All prior GT2/GT3's did not.

User avatar
S2tuner
Trader (Expired)
Posts: 1559
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Post by S2tuner » Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:31 am

Sims wrote:
S2tuner wrote:
ArthurPE wrote: really?

2008
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/30/no-s ... ect-injec/

now
check out their wesite
Since when has a 2008 article on Autoblog been a reliable source of information? Check out www.6speedonline.com where people have already taken brand new 3.8l GT3s and 997 GT2s apart, they both use the legendary GT1 engine still, not the japanese 9A1 DFI engine. The turbo and turbo S however do use DFI indeed. You can go on and call me a fool, but check your information more accurately, heck, you don't have any friends at Porsche NA? :lol:
AFAIK the Gen 2 997 GT3's have DFI, and most likely the 997 GT2 RS will also have it for that's the way it's going..

All prior GT2/GT3's did not.
It's not because gen2 997 GT3s are 3.8 that they also have DFI. Their engine management system is still a Bosch Motronic ME7.8.x, same as the GT2 and GT2RS, whereas all DFI cars run Siemens SDI3/4.x systems for Porsches ;) Hence my saying that no GT has DFI yet. Furthermore, the GT2RS has a 3.6 liter engine, whereas the gen2 997TT has the 3.8l 9A1 engine, which only confirms that the GT2RS's engine can only be the GT1 based "metzger" engine with no DFI.

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:50 am

S2tuner wrote:
It's not because gen2 997 GT3s are 3.8 that they also have DFI. Their engine management system is still a Bosch Motronic ME7.8.x, same as the GT2 and GT2RS, whereas all DFI cars run Siemens SDI3/4.x systems for Porsches ;) Hence my saying that no GT has DFI yet. Furthermore, the GT2RS has a 3.6 liter engine, whereas the gen2 997TT has the 3.8l 9A1 engine, which only confirms that the GT2RS's engine can only be the GT1 based "metzger" engine with no DFI.
Fair enough. Your comments about the 3.6 & Bosch noted .
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/4512 ... T2-RS.html

As I mentioned, I was not sure about the 997 GT2RS, but I am surprised the 7GT3 Gen 2 are not DFI - I thought they were.

User avatar
S2tuner
Trader (Expired)
Posts: 1559
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Post by S2tuner » Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:02 am

Sims wrote:
S2tuner wrote:
It's not because gen2 997 GT3s are 3.8 that they also have DFI. Their engine management system is still a Bosch Motronic ME7.8.x, same as the GT2 and GT2RS, whereas all DFI cars run Siemens SDI3/4.x systems for Porsches ;) Hence my saying that no GT has DFI yet. Furthermore, the GT2RS has a 3.6 liter engine, whereas the gen2 997TT has the 3.8l 9A1 engine, which only confirms that the GT2RS's engine can only be the GT1 based "metzger" engine with no DFI.
Fair enough. Your comments about the 3.6 & Bosch noted .
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/4512 ... T2-RS.html

As I mentioned, I was not sure about the 997 GT2RS, but I am surprised the 7GT3 Gen 2 are not DFI - I thought they were.
The DFI engines haven't been regarded as "bulletproof" by Porsche yet for their GT cars, which keep their warranty even if something wrong was to happen on track...that tells a lot about the good ole Metzger GT1 engine :lol:

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:27 pm

S2tuner wrote:
Sims wrote:
S2tuner wrote:
It's not because gen2 997 GT3s are 3.8 that they also have DFI. Their engine management system is still a Bosch Motronic ME7.8.x, same as the GT2 and GT2RS, whereas all DFI cars run Siemens SDI3/4.x systems for Porsches ;) Hence my saying that no GT has DFI yet. Furthermore, the GT2RS has a 3.6 liter engine, whereas the gen2 997TT has the 3.8l 9A1 engine, which only confirms that the GT2RS's engine can only be the GT1 based "metzger" engine with no DFI.
Fair enough. Your comments about the 3.6 & Bosch noted .
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/4512 ... T2-RS.html

As I mentioned, I was not sure about the 997 GT2RS, but I am surprised the 7GT3 Gen 2 are not DFI - I thought they were.
The DFI engines haven't been regarded as "bulletproof" by Porsche yet for their GT cars, which keep their warranty even if something wrong was to happen on track...that tells a lot about the good ole Metzger GT1 engine :lol:
Thanks for that. :thumbs:

So it is safe to buy a 997GT3 Gen 2 :lol:

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 195 guests