Sims wrote:
And you did not even ask my question on which your allegation was founded. I could answer all the detail, but it served no purpose for the threads covered all the points.
Less than half my posts are related to the carbon issue, would you venture a guess at what percentage of posts by Arthur are on that subject, and of ones outside the RS4 B7 section. Everyone here can check all the posts, and come to a conclusion on the breadth of topics.
Arthur is not correct about his allegation against me as you have alluded, but yet he repeats it on the same page. That should worry.
I am correct in my 'allegations'
but perhaps you should 'worry' a bit more about your actions than those of others...you shouldn't give a damn what others think, for several reasons: you can't influence them, it does you no good, only causes anxiety, it doesn't matter, steer your own course
what should 'worry' about is that almost 1/2 of you >700 posts in 10 weeks have been about carbon/power rating or generally antagonistic in nature...
I just went thru the 49 pages!!! of your posts...in 10 weeks, and it seems like 90% are in the RS4 forum...which is not suprising since we own RS4's...
you joined Jan 31, 2 weeks later you made the 'power claims' post
you have over around 60 posts in it alone....
as I said before, let each review your posts (if they give a darn) and draw their own conclusions...
still hanging:
50% power/wt difference, same speed...how???