You "have to" use different profiles if the tires width are different. Otherwise the center differential gets hurt because the diameter if the tire is different.Why have are you running different profiles front to back and have you experinced these problems?
Fave RS4 Pic
LolJarv wrote:LOL Dave. Thought you'd be happy we pi$$ed off the scousers with a fine 94th minute equaliser. The enemy of my enemy is my friend and all that.dace wrote:You are right Mike it was.
On another note............... Stuffy London Rent Boys!


Dave
I'm running 8.8 front and 9.5 rear, what profiles and tire widths should i have?okkim wrote:You "have to" use different profiles if the tires width are different. Otherwise the center differential gets hurt because the diameter if the tire is different.Why have are you running different profiles front to back and have you experinced these problems?
Just watch your backs on Saturday, with all them rent boys running around and all.dace wrote:LolJarv wrote:LOL Dave. Thought you'd be happy we pi$$ed off the scousers with a fine 94th minute equaliser. The enemy of my enemy is my friend and all that.dace wrote:You are right Mike it was.
On another note............... Stuffy London Rent Boys!
Nice one, I was going to keep my gun powder dry, however could not resist....
Mike
Q7
Q7
- rsmonkey918
- 2nd Gear
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:17 am
- Location: Guildford/Exmouth
The aspect ratio of the tyre ie. 30,35,40,45 etc is the percentage of the width of the tyre, which affects the rolling radius, so for instance off the top of my head a 17" 215/40 would roughly approximate to a 18" 225/35- gone up a width and down an aspect ratio- there are various permutations- some people like a 'square' sidewall profile, I personally like a more rounded look so may go down a width but keep the aspect ratio the same for a slightly 'stretched ' look. Some manufacturers build in some roundness to the shoulder anyway. One thing to bear in mind is that the lower the aspect ratio, the thicker the sidewall cross-section and the more rigid or stiff it is with obvious ride/handling/comfort issues on top of the manufacturers intent for that kind of tyre with regards to compound mixes etc. Also need to check pressures much more regularly as the sidewalls deform to a lesser extent when low on pressure masking deflation problems.
Steve
2000 X RS4 B5 Avus short shift, MTM/full Milltek to 460bhp, 19" Audi split rims/BBS CH's in anthracite, B7 front/rear big brake conversion, H&R ARB's/Bilstein PSS9's/ESP gearbox brace, retrofit RNS-E+Nav, ITG/MRC panel filter
2007 '07 Smart Brabus 101bhp, Bilsteins, Bentley Silverlake
2007 '56 Aprilia RSV Factory for some weekends
2004 '53 Honda Rune NRX1800 for other weekends
2000 X RS4 B5 Avus short shift, MTM/full Milltek to 460bhp, 19" Audi split rims/BBS CH's in anthracite, B7 front/rear big brake conversion, H&R ARB's/Bilstein PSS9's/ESP gearbox brace, retrofit RNS-E+Nav, ITG/MRC panel filter
2007 '07 Smart Brabus 101bhp, Bilsteins, Bentley Silverlake
2007 '56 Aprilia RSV Factory for some weekends
2004 '53 Honda Rune NRX1800 for other weekends
So if I have 255/35 front I should put 265/30 at the rear? I must admit I'm finding it difficult to understand "why" this should be so.rsmonkey918 wrote:The aspect ratio of the tyre ie. 30,35,40,45 etc is the percentage of the width of the tyre, which affects the rolling radius, so for instance off the top of my head a 17" 215/40 would roughly approximate to a 18" 225/35- gone up a width and down an aspect ratio- there are various permutations- some people like a 'square' sidewall profile, I personally like a more rounded look so may go down a width but keep the aspect ratio the same for a slightly 'stretched ' look. Some manufacturers build in some roundness to the shoulder anyway. One thing to bear in mind is that the lower the aspect ratio, the thicker the sidewall cross-section and the more rigid or stiff it is with obvious ride/handling/comfort issues on top of the manufacturers intent for that kind of tyre with regards to compound mixes etc. Also need to check pressures much more regularly as the sidewalls deform to a lesser extent when low on pressure masking deflation problems.
- rsmonkey918
- 2nd Gear
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:17 am
- Location: Guildford/Exmouth
Well you seem to have got the idea ok! If you go for a wider tyre you will need to drop an aspect ratio to maintain the rolling radius. Good idea is to visit a friendly upmarket tyre centre and ask to look at the various sizes/widths/ratio and profiles of various tyres. Stand a 255/35/19" next to a 265/30/19" and see the relative sizes of each. Other considerations are compound- can't be sure but if the ASC is really sensitive given the power of the RS4 it may even detect very small changes in grip between different manufactures/compounds.
Steve
2000 X RS4 B5 Avus short shift, MTM/full Milltek to 460bhp, 19" Audi split rims/BBS CH's in anthracite, B7 front/rear big brake conversion, H&R ARB's/Bilstein PSS9's/ESP gearbox brace, retrofit RNS-E+Nav, ITG/MRC panel filter
2007 '07 Smart Brabus 101bhp, Bilsteins, Bentley Silverlake
2007 '56 Aprilia RSV Factory for some weekends
2004 '53 Honda Rune NRX1800 for other weekends
2000 X RS4 B5 Avus short shift, MTM/full Milltek to 460bhp, 19" Audi split rims/BBS CH's in anthracite, B7 front/rear big brake conversion, H&R ARB's/Bilstein PSS9's/ESP gearbox brace, retrofit RNS-E+Nav, ITG/MRC panel filter
2007 '07 Smart Brabus 101bhp, Bilsteins, Bentley Silverlake
2007 '56 Aprilia RSV Factory for some weekends
2004 '53 Honda Rune NRX1800 for other weekends
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests