

Yes I agree it would have made the car quicker.SimonH wrote:Was having a spirited drive last night through some cracking B roads, and couldnt help thinking that this car would suit the DSG gearbox.Its probably a little lazy i know, but on a couple of occasions, i wished i could just pull a paddle to change down, and would have made faster progress coming in and out of a couple of corners.After the M5, i thought that the SMG actually added to the acceleration of that car quite a lot, with no drop in power through the shifts, and i think that the RS4 would benefit with this as well.Horses for courses i know, but i think i would have gone DSG if it were available.Only done 759 miles so far, and enjoying the car.Regards, SIMON.![]()
Personally, I now usually hate any form of auto/semi-auto box from any manufacturer. In my M3 (E46), the SMG-II was rubbish even at the most aggressive setting...jerky and not particularly fast on upchanges/downchanges/blipping.mrdeli wrote:I agree too. This was one of the reasons that I dropped out of my place on the new M3 - the DSG (ZMT) version of the M3 is not going to be released until 6 months after the September launch. Still the V8 torque makes the RS4 'almost' an auto around townAt least with it being the only option it made speccing the car less of a dilemma. I nearly drove myself mad choosing seats - gearbox choice might have finally pushed me over the edge! The DSG version of the R32 golf got a right slating from Evo this month - so who knows maybe we are better with the manual (it's one of their long termers).
Users browsing this forum: iainrs6 and 90 guests