S4 Heads vs RS4 heads

2.7 V6 30v biturbo - 251bhp
2.7 V6 30v biturbo - 261bhp
User avatar
saf
5th Gear
Posts: 1334
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:39 pm

S4 Heads vs RS4 heads

Post by saf » Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:15 pm

What are the differences between RS4 hears and S4 heads?

Ive had this explained before but still un clear.

When upgrading an S4 to stage3 K04 turbos with all RS4 bits IC's clutch flywheel injectors etc, and also heads are changed to RS4 heards, does that make car mechanically identical to an RS4 or are there other differences?

What are advantages and disadvantages between using S4 heads and RS4 heads on the S4.

Ive been told RS4's , turbos kick in at 3000 rpm and S4's at 2000 rpm because of the size of holes on the heads. This give you more low end grunt. Meaning?


Also more low down torque on an S4 because of smaller holes on the heads. Does this mean its better to have S4 heads if youre not going on track. If youre not going up to the high end of the speedo, is it better to stick to S4 heads?

Im thinking of doing an upgrade soon and want to know what heads to look out for.

Any advice would be much appreciated.

Many thanks

s4woody
Cruising
Posts: 3764
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 4:45 pm
Location: surrey.
Contact:

RE: S4 Heads vs RS4 heads

Post by s4woody » Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:54 pm

2.4 heads from an A6 would do you fine..with some RS4 valves cos there filled with gas and stay cooler..just to confuse you even more... :shock:
GARTH ROAD MOT CENTRE LTD
Unit 2 1-7 Amenity Way Garth rd Morden Surrey SM4 4AX
Exhausts,Clutches,Diagnostics,Tyres,Servicing and Air Conditioning
Opening soon is our new motorcycle Mot bay
020 83353032

User avatar
searider
2nd Gear
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 8:36 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: RE: S4 Heads vs RS4 heads

Post by searider » Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:38 pm

s4woody wrote:2.4 heads from an A6 would do you fine..with some RS4 valves cos there filled with gas and stay cooler..just to confuse you even more... :shock:
Gas?

How does that work?

I've heard of sodium filled valves - same thing?

User avatar
KayGee
5th Gear
Posts: 1420
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 7:33 pm
Location: UK

RE: S4 Heads vs RS4 heads

Post by KayGee » Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:42 pm

S4 and RS4 valves are the same. Exhaust cams are diff, Intake cams and valves are the same, only dfif. is exhaust cams and springs. From ettka.

S4 and RS4 are boh sodium fillled.

Rgds

Kaygee
99 Ming Saloon, Tanoga S/S, De-cat APR D/Ps, Miltek catback, Forge DVs, RS4 suspension, K04s, I/Cs, MAF, Clutch, injectors, oil cooler, airbox, Y pipe, spark plugs, front brakes, Vast EFK, Walbro fuel pump, MRC custom tune, 18" B7 RS4 reps, Kumho tyres

User avatar
Paulm
Top Gear
Posts: 1661
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Post by Paulm » Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:01 am

I would say this is all far to complicated. Cosworth (tuned the RS4) worked out the best compromise between Velosity and Volume.

Very Very basic.

Small ports S4. High velosity quick spool up = high low down torque

Larger ports RS4. High volume slower spool up = less low down torque but much more flow top end.

Cosworth prob spent thousands and thousands working out the best compromise.

If it were me I would go for the RS4 head and cam set up.
BMW 540i
2018 GTR
F90 M5
X3MC
RS3 Saloon
RS7 FL best car I've owned. No faith in turbo oil screen (turbos failing) or sticking oil scraper ring causing missfires.
F10 M5 LCI still no rear grip lol
S7 black Edition Too big and heavy
S3 8V FL DSG 310ps, road noise is a joke
RS3 8P Rubbish
C7 RS6 Fantastic car but missed playing
GTR R35 800bhp, too extreme, crazy fast though
911 Turbo Remapped. Hated it
F10 M5, awesome but no rear grip
RS6 V10 700BHP crazy
Porsche Cayenne Turbo S 600bhp

s4woody
Cruising
Posts: 3764
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 4:45 pm
Location: surrey.
Contact:

Post by s4woody » Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:09 am

you sure about them both being sodium filled..i thought only the ex valves on the RS4 were sodium filled..anyway sodium filled on a 2.4 head with RS4 cams must be the way to go..
GARTH ROAD MOT CENTRE LTD
Unit 2 1-7 Amenity Way Garth rd Morden Surrey SM4 4AX
Exhausts,Clutches,Diagnostics,Tyres,Servicing and Air Conditioning
Opening soon is our new motorcycle Mot bay
020 83353032

User avatar
saf
5th Gear
Posts: 1334
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:39 pm

Confused still

Post by saf » Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:31 am

When changing to RS4 heads with all other bits, likeIC's fuel pumps etc, Does that mean the car is basically an RS4. If not what differences are there?

Also When you get higher flow top end, you talking about quicker and smoother accelleration higher up rev range right?

What would be better for road use?

Also another thing im trying to get my head around, is when the S4 has higher low down torque, why does it have a slower 0-60 time than the RS4?

My answer to this is probably because the RS4 has uprated injectors, K04;s and better cooled.

So what happens if we leave the S4 heads on, and then add K04's and all other RS4 bits, like IC's clutch, flywheel, injectors fuel pumps etc with remap.

Will the S4 have a better 0-60 time simply because it has smaller heads?

What are differences between S4 and RS4 apart from aux parts IC's clutch turbos etc. What are the main engine block differences.

Thanks for answering the many questions so far.
Last edited by saf on Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
KayGee
5th Gear
Posts: 1420
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 7:33 pm
Location: UK

Post by KayGee » Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:42 am

Yes, both S4 and RS4 are using the same valves. However heads and exhaust cams are different.

Personally I'd go with 2.4. 2.6 or 2.8 NA heads (port matched to the RS IM and RS4 TB)

Good for very close to 600Bhp depending on turbo of choice

Much cheaper than MTM price for 605 BHp.
99 Ming Saloon, Tanoga S/S, De-cat APR D/Ps, Miltek catback, Forge DVs, RS4 suspension, K04s, I/Cs, MAF, Clutch, injectors, oil cooler, airbox, Y pipe, spark plugs, front brakes, Vast EFK, Walbro fuel pump, MRC custom tune, 18" B7 RS4 reps, Kumho tyres

User avatar
saf
5th Gear
Posts: 1334
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:39 pm

Post by saf » Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:48 am

Thanks Kevin,

Still confused on the head size and advantages and disadvantages of them.

The smaller heads. 2.4 2.6 and 2.8, what will be difference with these heads. Also What does NA mean and RS IM and RS$ TB.

Cheers mate

User avatar
Renarl
Neutral
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:22 pm

Post by Renarl » Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:10 am

saf wrote:Thanks Kevin,

Still confused on the head size and advantages and disadvantages of them.

The smaller heads. 2.4 2.6 and 2.8, what will be difference with these heads. Also What does NA mean and RS IM and RS$ TB.

Cheers mate
NA=naturally aspirated
TB= throttle body
IM= intake mani

Since i am upgrading my ride, reading Kaygees comment, it seems i should cancel my RS4 heads order and get a 2.8 head instead?
The replacement for displacement

User avatar
SimonS4MTM
Top Gear
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 2:40 pm
Location: Norfolk
Contact:

Post by SimonS4MTM » Fri Jun 16, 2006 9:08 am

Bottom end is different on RS4!
| RS4 - B7 | Phantom Black | Seit 2017 |
| S4 - B5 | Ebony Black | Seit 2002 |

User avatar
dummi
4th Gear
Posts: 951
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: birmingham

Post by dummi » Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:57 am

SimonS4MTM wrote:Bottom end is different on RS4!
i thought we cleared this up :lol:

User avatar
Paulm
Top Gear
Posts: 1661
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Post by Paulm » Fri Jun 16, 2006 11:24 am

KayGee wrote:Yes, both S4 and RS4 are using the same valves. However heads and exhaust cams are different.

Personally I'd go with 2.4. 2.6 or 2.8 NA heads (port matched to the RS IM and RS4 TB)
Dont take this the wrong way I am not having a go.

But when Cosworth were tasked with mods for the RS4 if the N/A heads are much better than S4 ones why did they not just slap them on and save a heap of cash? Or maybe they did ;-)

I know there is far more work that goes into N/A heads to make a good overall power delivery. Optimising flow, atomisation, tumble etc. Where as you could chuck just about any head onto a turbo engine and it would make good power (Very loosely speaking)
BMW 540i
2018 GTR
F90 M5
X3MC
RS3 Saloon
RS7 FL best car I've owned. No faith in turbo oil screen (turbos failing) or sticking oil scraper ring causing missfires.
F10 M5 LCI still no rear grip lol
S7 black Edition Too big and heavy
S3 8V FL DSG 310ps, road noise is a joke
RS3 8P Rubbish
C7 RS6 Fantastic car but missed playing
GTR R35 800bhp, too extreme, crazy fast though
911 Turbo Remapped. Hated it
F10 M5, awesome but no rear grip
RS6 V10 700BHP crazy
Porsche Cayenne Turbo S 600bhp

User avatar
saf
5th Gear
Posts: 1334
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:39 pm

Post by saf » Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:19 pm

SimonS4MTM wrote:Bottom end is different on RS4!

in what way?

User avatar
SimonS4MTM
Top Gear
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 2:40 pm
Location: Norfolk
Contact:

Post by SimonS4MTM » Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:25 pm

| RS4 - B7 | Phantom Black | Seit 2017 |
| S4 - B5 | Ebony Black | Seit 2002 |

Post Reply

Return to “S4 (B5 Typ 8D) 1997-2002”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests