If a vehicle changes lane between the cameras, the data is not resolved.
We just need someone to volunteer to try it.

Ah, the system I'm familiar with has two cameras per lane, one at either end of a measured distance. These even more sinister multiple camera set-ups you mention are new to me.Mike159 wrote:But surely if there are more than 2 it will not work. If you switch after the first one, then once you go through the second one you will be measured between that and the 3rd or the 1st and the 3rd!
The easiest option I find is just to set the cruise control - job done, and no crossing of fingers, etc.quattrokid1 wrote:how about just slowing down for a few minutes instead of weaving around trying to evade the cameras?
That certainly was true. Apparently the company rushed the development and certification of the average speed cameras. They had to do a large amount of testing to be able to legally prove the system was accurate. They didnt have time to prove (legally) that it was reliable if the car changed lane.DickyC wrote:More research (I beaver away behind the scenes, you know) reveals one of those quirks of law that make you wonder what law makers do all day.
Apparently, the system is perfectly capable of recognising and tracking cars that change lane, it's just that its ability to do this isn't recognised in law because it hasn't been type tested yet!! One lane, yes. More than one lane, no.
That is so wacky, it has to be true.![]()
The RS2 doesn't have cruise cotrol, btw. Well, mine doesn't.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests