Sounds like you've got a good one budaudijohn wrote:Alex, I have covered just 2000 miles now using full power now, burns NO Oil and is much quicker than the demo I tried with 5K on the clock.

Sounds like you've got a good one budaudijohn wrote:Alex, I have covered just 2000 miles now using full power now, burns NO Oil and is much quicker than the demo I tried with 5K on the clock.
Don't think it is out yet but there has been talk on pistonheads from people who know the Evo reviewers who apparently have swayed towards the M3. Something about finding themselves wanting to get in the M3 (rather than RS4) for the journey back from the continent. Probably to do with the reviewers being too fat to fit in the bucket seats for long periods of timejackwood wrote:When was EVO out?W8PMC wrote:The EVO article sways the other way & puts the new M3 ahead.
not sure about Autocar but Evo did this comparison (with a C53 AMG Merc)and the CS won by the narrowest of margins. It was the usual high quality piece of journalism that beared no comparison to driving patterns of 90% of drivers and certainly me. They said the RS4 looked better, sounded better, went better, had a better interior but that at 10/10ths on a deserted Welsh hill road the CS was slightly the sweeter handling.marin wrote:haha! you guys love the review. Yes is a good review but it doesnt make sense logically. I think you forget that they wrote previously that the e46 M3 CS was better than the RS4... Have BMW gone a step back with the E92 M3? I think not. Another dodgy review. Dont you think so?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 97 guests