Fave RS4 Pic

2.7 V6 30v biturbo - 380 bhp
User avatar
okkim
3rd Gear
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 12:44 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by okkim » Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:12 am

Why have are you running different profiles front to back and have you experinced these problems?
You "have to" use different profiles if the tires width are different. Otherwise the center differential gets hurt because the diameter if the tire is different.

dace
5th Gear
Posts: 1292
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 4:28 pm

Post by dace » Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:30 am

Jarv wrote:
dace wrote:You are right Mike it was.

On another note............... Stuffy London Rent Boys!
LOL Dave. Thought you'd be happy we pi$$ed off the scousers with a fine 94th minute equaliser. The enemy of my enemy is my friend and all that.

:)
Lol :wink: Nice one, I was going to keep my gun powder dry, however could not resist.... 8)
Dave

Jhcolling
2nd Gear
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:34 pm

Post by Jhcolling » Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:31 pm

okkim wrote:
Why have are you running different profiles front to back and have you experinced these problems?
You "have to" use different profiles if the tires width are different. Otherwise the center differential gets hurt because the diameter if the tire is different.
I'm running 8.8 front and 9.5 rear, what profiles and tire widths should i have?

User avatar
Jarv
5th Gear
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: North London
Contact:

Post by Jarv » Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:49 pm

dace wrote:
Jarv wrote:
dace wrote:You are right Mike it was.

On another note............... Stuffy London Rent Boys!
LOL Dave. Thought you'd be happy we pi$$ed off the scousers with a fine 94th minute equaliser. The enemy of my enemy is my friend and all that.

:)
Lol :wink: Nice one, I was going to keep my gun powder dry, however could not resist.... 8)
Just watch your backs on Saturday, with all them rent boys running around and all.
Mike

Q7

User avatar
rsmonkey918
2nd Gear
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:17 am
Location: Guildford/Exmouth

Post by rsmonkey918 » Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:39 pm

The aspect ratio of the tyre ie. 30,35,40,45 etc is the percentage of the width of the tyre, which affects the rolling radius, so for instance off the top of my head a 17" 215/40 would roughly approximate to a 18" 225/35- gone up a width and down an aspect ratio- there are various permutations- some people like a 'square' sidewall profile, I personally like a more rounded look so may go down a width but keep the aspect ratio the same for a slightly 'stretched ' look. Some manufacturers build in some roundness to the shoulder anyway. One thing to bear in mind is that the lower the aspect ratio, the thicker the sidewall cross-section and the more rigid or stiff it is with obvious ride/handling/comfort issues on top of the manufacturers intent for that kind of tyre with regards to compound mixes etc. Also need to check pressures much more regularly as the sidewalls deform to a lesser extent when low on pressure masking deflation problems.
Steve

2000 X RS4 B5 Avus short shift, MTM/full Milltek to 460bhp, 19" Audi split rims/BBS CH's in anthracite, B7 front/rear big brake conversion, H&R ARB's/Bilstein PSS9's/ESP gearbox brace, retrofit RNS-E+Nav, ITG/MRC panel filter
2007 '07 Smart Brabus 101bhp, Bilsteins, Bentley Silverlake
2007 '56 Aprilia RSV Factory for some weekends
2004 '53 Honda Rune NRX1800 for other weekends

Jhcolling
2nd Gear
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:34 pm

Post by Jhcolling » Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:00 pm

rsmonkey918 wrote:The aspect ratio of the tyre ie. 30,35,40,45 etc is the percentage of the width of the tyre, which affects the rolling radius, so for instance off the top of my head a 17" 215/40 would roughly approximate to a 18" 225/35- gone up a width and down an aspect ratio- there are various permutations- some people like a 'square' sidewall profile, I personally like a more rounded look so may go down a width but keep the aspect ratio the same for a slightly 'stretched ' look. Some manufacturers build in some roundness to the shoulder anyway. One thing to bear in mind is that the lower the aspect ratio, the thicker the sidewall cross-section and the more rigid or stiff it is with obvious ride/handling/comfort issues on top of the manufacturers intent for that kind of tyre with regards to compound mixes etc. Also need to check pressures much more regularly as the sidewalls deform to a lesser extent when low on pressure masking deflation problems.
So if I have 255/35 front I should put 265/30 at the rear? I must admit I'm finding it difficult to understand "why" this should be so.

User avatar
rsmonkey918
2nd Gear
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:17 am
Location: Guildford/Exmouth

Post by rsmonkey918 » Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:09 am

Well you seem to have got the idea ok! If you go for a wider tyre you will need to drop an aspect ratio to maintain the rolling radius. Good idea is to visit a friendly upmarket tyre centre and ask to look at the various sizes/widths/ratio and profiles of various tyres. Stand a 255/35/19" next to a 265/30/19" and see the relative sizes of each. Other considerations are compound- can't be sure but if the ASC is really sensitive given the power of the RS4 it may even detect very small changes in grip between different manufactures/compounds.
Steve

2000 X RS4 B5 Avus short shift, MTM/full Milltek to 460bhp, 19" Audi split rims/BBS CH's in anthracite, B7 front/rear big brake conversion, H&R ARB's/Bilstein PSS9's/ESP gearbox brace, retrofit RNS-E+Nav, ITG/MRC panel filter
2007 '07 Smart Brabus 101bhp, Bilsteins, Bentley Silverlake
2007 '56 Aprilia RSV Factory for some weekends
2004 '53 Honda Rune NRX1800 for other weekends

Devil
Neutral
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 2:57 pm

Post by Devil » Sun Apr 27, 2008 1:18 pm

my favourit pics of my RS

Image
Image

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B5 Typ 8D) 1999-2001”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests