How many unmodified B5 RS4...?

2.7 V6 30v biturbo - 380 bhp
User avatar
Contigo
Top Gear
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:32 pm

Post by Contigo » Sat Nov 14, 2009 10:11 am

MRC custom neckarsulm, definitely.
2001 Avus Silver RS4 B5 60k on clock, MRC Custom Remap, Sunroof, Bluetooth prep

2006 Daytona Grey RS4 B7, RNS-E - SOLD

2006 BMW M6 - GONE

ronan
1st Gear
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:30 pm

Post by ronan » Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:01 pm

mine is standard apart from B7 front brakes

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

Post by neckarsulm » Sat Nov 14, 2009 3:38 pm

MRC custom neckarsulm, definitely.
Come on then Doug, do us a good deal, think I'll get it half price if I only want 400 bhp? :D

On the subject of durability;
The C5 RS6 only came with Tip as no manual box could handle the torque (some say no auto can either...)
The factory RS6 figure is 560nm, a populare remap takes the RS4 from 440nm to 550nm which is mightily close to what was deemed too much torque for a manual 'box by quattro GmbH.
From experience transmissions are the weakest link in VAG cars and when linked to cars that don't wheelspin easily (i.e.quattro) and produce loads of torque (2.7TT) you can see why the factory limit torque output to save them.
Having said that, if you don't drive hard all the time and have a degree of mechanical sympathy then it's unlikely to cause that much trouble.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

User avatar
quattrokid1
Top Gear
Posts: 1667
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: East Ayrshire

Post by quattrokid1 » Sat Nov 14, 2009 5:33 pm

OURS IS STANDARD except for the diverter valves and the front splitter fitted:)

living in the U.K.....is it really worth it? perfpromance is well outside whats concidered adiquate and with this current IN YOUR FACE environmental treehugger issues ( bollocks to that) and cost of fuel and BIG BROTHER watching every move you make, I dont see the point in making it go faster when all the police are interested in is catching motorists having a bit of fun... FUN in a car ( driving it I mean) has long gone,or speed cameras sprouting up all over the dam road network.

making a car faster is just tempting fate and in this current climate,its not a good idea loosing ones licence either as your job etc!!
Misano red B5 RS4 710 D/V's SERVICED BY EL GRIZZMO:).... Wife's !!
Tornado red WR quattro :):)
UrS4 saloon auto:) resurected by Unit20
Audi S3 8L Imola yellow

Audi B6 S4 Cabrio SOLD :( :(
Audi 100 2.2E SOLD
Audi 80 cabrio 2.6 V6 (SOLD)
Audi 90 quattro SOLD

hakkis
Neutral
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:12 pm

Post by hakkis » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:36 pm

will I retain more value this way?
Any thoughts on this one.

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

Post by neckarsulm » Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:36 pm

Quote:
will I retain more value this way?
Any thoughts on this one.
I have had a good think about this and I don't think a remap or standard is a massive factor in the value of an RS4.
However as they get older it may be more of an issue.

While the tuners insist remaps don't cause cam wear it's accepted that remaps can accelerate engine and transmission wear.
But then so can abusive driving and poor servicing.

suppose a standard car is worth more and assuming you can't believe everything a seller says, can you really tell a standard car from a remapped one on a test drive? I probably can having had both but when I bought my remapped RS4 it had a duff MAF so was down on power and felt stock.

So IMHO no.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

ess4avant
1st Gear
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 2:58 pm
Location: Kent

Post by ess4avant » Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:14 pm

Mine is still standard apart from rs6 callipers , long term reliability is no.1 priority

:yellowrs4:

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

Post by neckarsulm » Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:23 pm

Mine is still standard apart from rs6 callipers , long term reliability is no.1 priority
So is it now widely accepted that remaps affect long term reliability?
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

User avatar
TopBear
4th Gear
Posts: 924
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:41 am
Location: Glasgow

Post by TopBear » Thu Feb 04, 2010 9:21 pm

neckarsulm wrote:
Mine is still standard apart from rs6 callipers , long term reliability is no.1 priority
So is it now widely accepted that remaps affect long term reliability?
Why, because 2 people who havent remapped their car say so?

In my view, there are so many more variables involved in the 'long term reliability' of a car, than just whether it has been remapped.

Also what is the definition of 'long term' ?
:blackrs4: B5 RS4, MRC Remap, Milltek, RS6\B7 Brakes, Black\Carbon

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

Post by neckarsulm » Thu Feb 04, 2010 9:40 pm

Topbear, obviously there are variables BUT all other things being equal, would an engine with a remap be more worn after say 100k miles than a standard one?

Engine wear occurs over a long period hence the reference to long term, whether it's a remap or lack of servicing or abusive driving, the effects of this are not immediate and can only be assessed over the "long term"

Seeing as most RS4s are close to 100k miles, its at this "long term" mileage where the effects of the above are more likely to manifest themselves.

My personal view which you may not agree with is that if you go for a remap you are going to drive the car harder, why else would you do it?!
And doing this will, yes, increase engine wear particularly on this engine with so much torque when on WOT boost.

I should say that I have owned both, have standard now and I am considering a remap so I am not biased, just trying to get to the facts.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

ess4avant
1st Gear
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 2:58 pm
Location: Kent

Post by ess4avant » Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:34 pm

TopBear wrote:
neckarsulm wrote:
Mine is still standard apart from rs6 callipers , long term reliability is no.1 priority
So is it now widely accepted that remaps affect long term reliability?
Why, because 2 people who havent remapped their car say so?

In my view, there are so many more variables involved in the 'long term reliability' of a car, than just whether it has been remapped.

Also what is the definition of 'long term' ?
My RS4 is 9 years old with 130k on the clock apart from cambelt services and
one front wheel bearing it is still on original clutch, gearbox,drivetrain,exhaust
camshafts etc. and dont use any oil from one service to the next !
thats my definition of ' long term reliability '

User avatar
tdiquattro
3rd Gear
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 4:55 pm
Location: Bucks

Post by tdiquattro » Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:12 pm

Why are you only considering the power?

There are quite a number of changes that make the car much better, surely handling, braking, gearchange, cooling, intercooling, ride height, audio, engine - gearbox - diff mounting sturdiness, reliability, tracking setup, etc

mods arent all about power and can improve and enhance a performance car.
Nige'

2000 silver S4 Saloon

drjones1
1st Gear
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:24 pm

Post by drjones1 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:04 am

I to have had both and indeed both of which were eventualy re mapped. In 2002 i had a Revo map and loved it.

My second one in 2009 had an MRC stage 1 map and also love it.

I have to say that from memory the MRC map is better the Revo map appeared (from the sound of the exhust) to produce its power from boost.

The MRC map would appear to produce its power from predominatly timing... but it has 7 years of knowledge on its side..

Having a standard car remapped in my opionion is a no brainer, it is simply a different car.

But!!!! of course it will wear out sooner it is working harder full stop...
A8 3.0TDI quattro sport (every day)
B5 RS4 (the second one)
UR quattro (450bhp)
AC Cobra (replica)
Ford GT40 (replica)
A3 (Wife)
Sit on lawn mower (12hp....)

User avatar
bustermb
1st Gear
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:15 pm

std

Post by bustermb » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:37 pm

mine is 100% std out the box...... just the way i wanted it when i wanted one and sure the there are a few people wanting a std one when they are looking to buy
plus im fed up of modding
its also nice for people to mod the way they want too :nogarors4:

eyeball
2nd Gear
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 11:47 pm

RE: std

Post by eyeball » Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:25 pm

Mines unmodded aswel, I keep thinking of having an mrc remap but I dont really need it. I have done many modded cars, mainly for rallying but sometimes is nice to see a bog standard motor driving about. I used to have a escort cosworth whichwas in imperial blue and standard and to me that looked better than modded and I reaaly like the RS that that way. Everyone to their own.....but id love to go out in a mrc mapped car to see the difference??...Contigo...lol

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B5 Typ 8D) 1999-2001”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests