Nearly failed MOT on emissions?!?!

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
User avatar
paulo
1st Gear
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Surrey

Nearly failed MOT on emissions?!?!

Post by paulo » Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:49 pm

Today I had to take my car for its first MOT. Everything was going well (as expected) until the emissions test.

The Lambda was reading high (by quite a bit).

The guy ended up leaving it, doing so other things, and then retesting it. Luckily, everything was ok the second time around.

Now, should the emissions still be acceptable when running in sports mode? The reason I ask, was that before the test, the guys where playing with the sports mode, and revving it a bit. Could this have thrown the readings, even after putting back to normal mode before the test?

Anybody else had problems with emissions?


Paul

User avatar
PetrolDave
Cruising
Posts: 7599
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:28 am
Location: Southampton, Hampshire UK

RE: Nearly failed MOT on emissions?!?!

Post by PetrolDave » Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:51 am

I had my first MOT last week and sailed through the emissions tests no problem.

Revving it should, if anything, be a good thing since it will clear out any soft build-ups in the engine/exhaust (remember that the MOT test for a diesel REQUIRES the engine to be run to the limiter before the emissions tests are made to clear out smoke particles etc.).
Gone: 2006 B7 RS4 Avant (Phantom Black)

User avatar
S2tuner
Trader (Expired)
Posts: 1559
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 am
Location: Oxfordshire

RE: Nearly failed MOT on emissions?!?!

Post by S2tuner » Sat Jul 25, 2009 6:51 pm

Cats were probably cold, which explains why the car failed on the first test.

scaghead
Top Gear
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:52 pm
Location: essex

RE: Nearly failed MOT on emissions?!?!

Post by scaghead » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:38 am

my motor has just failed the emissions test on lambda.....pass is min of 0.970 to max 1.030..my reading was 1.9 to 2.04 slightly high :roll: ..... co reading was 0.02 and HC was 31 ppm these two readings were fine... any ideas fellas
R8 gen1 v10 plus white. Larini clubsport valved zorst.carbon side flicks,and fixed carbon spoiler.
Previous..RS4 Sprint blue loon..milltek non-res valved.revolution carbon air intake kit.cold air feed.carbon clean.MRC stage 2 remap..led interior lights.dectane led rear lights.led drls.Argon carbon oil splitter,race style front splitter,B and C door pillars and engine bottle cover..KW lowering springs.HEL brake lines all round.

pad125
4th Gear
Posts: 564
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:11 pm
Location: Shepperton

RE: Nearly failed MOT on emissions?!?!

Post by pad125 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:20 pm

Scaghead, Is it in with the dealer for the MOT? They'll probably point to the Mass Air Meter first and want to change that, after that.................it could be a world of hurt!! :(

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

RE: Nearly failed MOT on emissions?!?!

Post by neckarsulm » Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:26 pm

scaghead, I'm surprised that it's running so lean and yet spot on with CO and HC
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

karl
4th Gear
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:36 pm

Re: RE: Nearly failed MOT on emissions?!?!

Post by karl » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:41 pm

S2tuner wrote:Cats were probably cold, which explains why the car failed on the first test.
Cats? What Cats?! :D

scaghead
Top Gear
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:52 pm
Location: essex

Re: RE: Nearly failed MOT on emissions?!?!

Post by scaghead » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:00 pm

neckarsulm wrote:scaghead, I'm surprised that it's running so lean and yet spot on with CO and HC
yes that is the thing that is a bit confusing.. at low rpm it was at its worst 2.04 as it was reved up to 4000 rpm it feel a little to 1.94.. am i right in thinking if it was the lamda sensor it would mess with the co reading??

scaghead
Top Gear
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:52 pm
Location: essex

Re: RE: Nearly failed MOT on emissions?!?!

Post by scaghead » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:07 pm

pad125 wrote:Scaghead, Is it in with the dealer for the MOT? They'll probably point to the Mass Air Meter first and want to change that, after that.................it could be a world of hurt!! :(
patrick i got the mot done at a friends garage.. the world of hurt dont sound to nice :) i have had it re-mapped but that was nearly two years ago so i have ruled that one out as it was ok last year..

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

RE: Re: RE: Nearly failed MOT on emissions?!?!

Post by neckarsulm » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:10 pm

Standard or Milltek? I'd say possibly post cat air leak in exhaust but could be other things
Do you have Co2 and O2 readings as well?
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

scaghead
Top Gear
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:52 pm
Location: essex

RE: Re: RE: Nearly failed MOT on emissions?!?!

Post by scaghead » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:23 pm

standard exhaust system fella.. would it be a case of i dont really use it that often and it needs me to give it a bit of a tanking to clear it out a little :D the op had the same issue but it self cured while he was there :? ...i will take it back monday and give it another go... if not a trip to the good old dealers for me..
the only readings i have are those above fella...

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

Post by neckarsulm » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:53 pm

It's quite normal for a car to take a couple of goes to get through the emissions test especially if it's been around town a lot.
I'd appreciate Minhea's (S2tuner) view on this but I always thought cold cats (but engine fully up to operating temp) would increase the CO as well as mess up the lambda.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

Dom81
Top Gear
Posts: 2124
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:00 am
Location: London

Post by Dom81 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:29 am

neckarsulm wrote:It's quite normal for a car to take a couple of goes to get through the emissions test especially if it's been around town a lot.
Interesting. I worried reading these posts, so dug out my latest (and so far, only) emission results from an MOT test in March. At fast idle they were -

CO 0.01% (limit =< 0.20%)
HC 8ppm (limit =< 200ppm)
Lamda 1.002 (tolerance 0.97 - 1.03)

No comfort to Scaghead or the OP, but since the car is low mileage and crucially does nothing around town, I guess it might be that the stop / start and cold runs contribute?
2007 Daytona RS4 Avant

scaghead
Top Gear
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:52 pm
Location: essex

Post by scaghead » Sun Oct 10, 2010 3:59 am

Dom81 wrote:
neckarsulm wrote:It's quite normal for a car to take a couple of goes to get through the emissions test especially if it's been around town a lot.
Interesting. I worried reading these posts, so dug out my latest (and so far, only) emission results from an MOT test in March. At fast idle they were -

CO 0.01% (limit =< 0.20%)
HC 8ppm (limit =< 200ppm)
Lamda 1.002 (tolerance 0.97 - 1.03)

No comfort to Scaghead or the OP, but since the car is low mileage and crucially does nothing around town, I guess it might be that the stop / start and cold runs contribute?
you could be right there fella. i will see what happens on monday 8)

User avatar
sonny
Cruising
Posts: 10278
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Kent

Post by sonny » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:22 am

Was it a dealer or Indy you had the MOT done?
Money can't buy you love, but it can buy you a well sorted racecar

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests