1.8T vs 3.2

All things related to Audi and other manufacturers
Post Reply
User avatar
Riz_RS4
Cruising
Posts: 2927
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: South Yorkshire
Contact:

1.8T vs 3.2

Post by Riz_RS4 » Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:57 pm

Another "what are your views" question.

3.2 V6 or 1.8T

Which would you prefer and why?

3.2 V6 develops 250bhp with 320nm
1.8T develops 210/225bhp with 270/280nm

Both have similar performace but the 1.8T block does sound rather dull in my opnion.

Riz [img]images/graemlins/s3addict.gif[/img]
Image I`m just a hardcore petrol head :)

samtheman
2nd Gear
Posts: 187
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 7:24 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by samtheman » Tue Oct 28, 2003 12:38 am

i'd choose the 225 bhp 1.8t because i just love it when the turbo (s) come whistlin in!! mmmmmm mmmmmmm! [img]images/graemlins/burnout.gif[/img] [img]images/graemlins/biggrin3.gif[/img]

4corta
Neutral
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 9:15 am
Location: Italy

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by 4corta » Wed Oct 29, 2003 4:58 pm

1.8T anyway and anytime ! And more again considering the new 2.0T FSI saw at IIAA on Golf GTI concept : hope to have this on new S3 ( but whith 280/300 HP [img]images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img].
Read on www.fast-zi-nation.de : Audi is developping , for next A4 , a new engine super&turbocharged at same time [img]images/graemlins/jawdrop.gif[/img]
4corta

User avatar
DuncS3
Top Gear
Posts: 2093
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 9:50 pm
Location: Surrey
Contact:

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by DuncS3 » Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:24 pm

tough one - 3.2 sounds great, but no turbo kick

Dunc

User avatar
sitas3
5th Gear
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 4:58 pm
Location: Surrey, UK

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by sitas3 » Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:29 pm

3.2 sounds good to me - reliability wise, would the 3.2 be able to handle better power increases?
M3 CSL - Silver Grey, a few options.

User avatar
Riz_RS4
Cruising
Posts: 2927
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: South Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by Riz_RS4 » Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:57 pm

Yes i think the 3.2 V6 block has good potential..... remember that tuned R32 with B-turbo configuration [img]images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] over 500bhp if i recall correctly... and the sound of a bigger engine is way better than the weezy 1.8T blocks.....

Im still hoping for a special RS car around late 2005 / early 2006

Riz [img]images/graemlins/29428-red4.gif[/img]
Image I`m just a hardcore petrol head :)

User avatar
Paul-RS
4th Gear
Posts: 664
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 1:31 am
Location: UK

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by Paul-RS » Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:00 pm

1.8T for me.

Love the V6 but id want a factory turbo'd motor than a bolt on kit....

i will have a v6 bi turbo one day in some shape or form, but it would have originally started off as one from factory not a conversion...

User avatar
Riz_RS4
Cruising
Posts: 2927
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: South Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by Riz_RS4 » Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:17 pm

Yep lets hope the RS3 gets the green light with a 3.2 V6 block [img]images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Riz [img]images/graemlins/s3addict.gif[/img]
Image I`m just a hardcore petrol head :)

User avatar
s8n
3rd Gear
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 12:13 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by s8n » Sat Nov 01, 2003 6:38 am

The note of the 1.8T is definately not very inspiring... But I love the kick of the turbo...

Best of both worlds? a turbo'd 3.2 [img]images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Bring on the RS3 Audi
Audi S3

User avatar
Scotty
5th Gear
Posts: 1290
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 2:20 pm
Location: Essex, UK

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by Scotty » Sat Nov 01, 2003 12:40 pm

I like it when the turbo kicks in but having the instant power of a V6 is making me wonder what to do in the future.
B8 A4 Avant quattro
Honda CBR1100XX Super Blackbird
Suzuki GSXR1000 (Track bike)
B6 S4 (AMD Stage 3) - GONE
8N TT (APR/AMD/MTM) - GONE

BURTON
Neutral
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 6:54 pm
Location: Ipswich

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by BURTON » Fri Nov 07, 2003 8:13 pm

The sound of any V6 is nice! But a VAG one is even nicer!!
I would have to say the 3.2! Just for the noise! when i get bored of the power! a chip get bored of that Turbo city!!

ChrisG
3rd Gear
Posts: 480
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 5:47 pm
Location: Berkshire

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by ChrisG » Fri Nov 07, 2003 8:51 pm

The V6 sounds so smooooooth but I love the turbo engines. Been driving one since 1996 and love the power delivery; over about 2000rpm almost any gear will do......I expect the V6 is really flexible but surely does not have the same sort of kick. Back to back test needed.
ChrisG

User avatar
wazza
Top Gear
Posts: 2464
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 1:07 am
Location: Near the Magic Roundabout
Contact:

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by wazza » Fri Nov 07, 2003 9:20 pm

Just get a V6 with a turbo [img]images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] or two [img]images/graemlins/thumbs.gif[/img]
Paul

User avatar
PhilT
RS246.com
Posts: 8715
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 2:03 pm
Location: South Yorkshire

Re: 1.8T vs 3.2

Post by PhilT » Sat Nov 08, 2003 1:48 pm

Or supercharger..... [img]images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
RS246 Shop - RS246 Window Stickers and RS6 Keyrings

Current : 2016 Audi SQ7 & Radical SR3 Supersport

Ex : 2010 Nissan GT-R Premium Edition, 2014 Audi S3 Sportback, 2007 Audi Q7 4.2 TDI, Clio 172 Cup, B5 RS4, C5 RS6+ (249/999), S2 Coupe, Ex-Police Senator 3.0 24v, Ford Escort 1.3

Post Reply

Return to “General Car Chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests