rs6 vs cls63..chris harris

4.0 V8 40v biturbo TFSI - 553 bhp
4.0 V8 40v biturbo TFSI - 597 bhp (Performance)
Post Reply
User avatar
gangstarrrrr
2nd Gear
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:40 pm

Re: rs6 vs cls63..chris harris

Post by gangstarrrrr » Fri Aug 09, 2013 7:45 pm

doodlebug wrote:Basic car steel, ceramics 8.6k or part of dynamic pack plus at 10.7k.
8.6k is simply extortionate, surprised people pay that.
Top
doodlebug
Cruising
Posts: 5833
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:56 am
Location: Somewhere. Maybe.

Re: rs6 vs cls63..chris harris

Post by doodlebug » Fri Aug 09, 2013 7:52 pm

gangstarrrrr wrote:
doodlebug wrote:Basic car steel, ceramics 8.6k or part of dynamic pack plus at 10.7k.
8.6k is simply extortionate, surprised people pay that.
That is all four on the 6.
Top
cfcdoc
4th Gear
Posts: 739
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:55 am

Re: rs6 vs cls63..chris harris

Post by cfcdoc » Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:49 pm

doodlebug wrote:Basic car steel, ceramics 8.6k or part of dynamic pack plus at 10.7k.

I was being facetious given most german marques and what you get for basic RRP
She may be big and heavy but its whats on the inside that counts.....
Top
User avatar
gdavison
5th Gear
Posts: 1233
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:49 pm
Location: Hampshire / Berkshire

Re: rs6 vs cls63..chris harris

Post by gdavison » Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:02 pm

I cant spec a C7 at below 97 K ... and I am trying to go cheap
Ex RS6 C6 Driver, gone but not forgotten.. The best car I have ever owned
Top
doodlebug
Cruising
Posts: 5833
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:56 am
Location: Somewhere. Maybe.

Re: rs6 vs cls63..chris harris

Post by doodlebug » Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:06 pm

gdavison wrote:I cant spec a C7 at below 97 K ... and I am trying to go cheap
Yep, that's the problem. If you can get one for Broadspeed numbers it's better, but still fairly obscene.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “RS6 (C7 Typ 4G) 2013-2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests