differences between PE and non-PE

4.0 V8 40v biturbo TFSI - 553 bhp
4.0 V8 40v biturbo TFSI - 597 bhp (Performance)
Post Reply
rtd
Cruising
Posts: 2542
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:02 pm

differences between PE and non-PE

Post by rtd » Tue Mar 15, 2016 9:47 am

Does anyone know if there are any mechanical differences between the PE and non-PE cars, has any strengthening of the engine be done etc?
Volvo XC90
C7 - RS6
C6 - RS6
B5 - RS4

robf
3rd Gear
Posts: 288
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 10:31 pm

Re: differences between PE and non-PE

Post by robf » Tue Mar 15, 2016 12:31 pm

Guess you'd have to get someone to do a parts no. check. I haven't seen any details (and i've done a lot of Googling!) so assuming it is just a map.

Of course, the question is how much power the map brings. Fascinated to see someone get a PE on the rolling road to see what numbers it makes, given the standard car makes over quoted figures.
Current Fleet:
2016 Audi RS6 Performance
2015 Porsche 991 GT3
2015 Porsche 991 Carrera 4 Cab
2012 Porsche Cayenne Diesel
2010 Land Rover Defender 5.0 V8

TomRS
4th Gear
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 1:36 pm
Location: Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: differences between PE and non-PE

Post by TomRS » Tue Mar 15, 2016 1:36 pm

robf wrote:Guess you'd have to get someone to do a parts no. check. I haven't seen any details (and i've done a lot of Googling!) so assuming it is just a map.

Of course, the question is how much power the map brings. Fascinated to see someone get a PE on the rolling road to see what numbers it makes, given the standard car makes over quoted figures.
I assume its just a map as the same engine is in the new S8 and that was quoted 605Ps out the box all they have done is match the new S8 with the PE edition.
It may also have different Cat's to cope with the extra emissions, has anyone checked c02 output between the two "engines" thats a good indicator.
It might just be a map but it'll certainly be a well engineered one to make it conform to the Euro emissions trash!
Audi RS4 B5 + Audi Q7 4.2TDi
Gone but not forgotten :smile_smoking:
2017 Mercedes E63S W213 1033/1400nm
2013 Mercedes E63S W212 740/1200nm
2010 Nissan GT-R SVM 680R
2010 RS6 C6 Avant Stage 2 730/1088nm

wildbore
4th Gear
Posts: 659
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:29 pm
Location: Surrey

Re: differences between PE and non-PE

Post by wildbore » Tue Mar 15, 2016 1:39 pm

Quoted CO2 and fuel consumption are identical between PE and Non-PE.

TomRS
4th Gear
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 1:36 pm
Location: Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: differences between PE and non-PE

Post by TomRS » Tue Mar 15, 2016 1:42 pm

wildbore wrote:Quoted CO2 and fuel consumption are identical between PE and Non-PE.
I wonder how they've done it then? there's no way it would stay the same, saying that... in the C02 tests the new map might not affect that, leaving the figures identical.
But usually a mapped car will have a higher c02 output, unless im talking out my ass someone can correct me, but i guess it depends on how the tests are done.
Audi/VW are good at beating emissions tests ;) hahaha!
Audi RS4 B5 + Audi Q7 4.2TDi
Gone but not forgotten :smile_smoking:
2017 Mercedes E63S W213 1033/1400nm
2013 Mercedes E63S W212 740/1200nm
2010 Nissan GT-R SVM 680R
2010 RS6 C6 Avant Stage 2 730/1088nm

wildbore
4th Gear
Posts: 659
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:29 pm
Location: Surrey

Re: differences between PE and non-PE

Post by wildbore » Tue Mar 15, 2016 1:50 pm

The emissions and fuel consumption tests run at specific speeds and engine loads. The PE map only kicks in at the very high end of the rev range and thus the official CO2 and fuel consumption tests just don't see the change to the map impinging on the test process.

This is quite common and I have seen it elsewhere - albeit also in the VW group. Compare the Bentley Continental GT and GT Speed variants and you will see the exact same thing. I haven't bothered checking the Bentley V8 and V8S figures (which use the same basic engine as the RS6) but I would imagine it's the same: different engine outputs but identical CO2 and fuel consumption figures.

User avatar
MikeFish
Cruising
Posts: 15588
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: The Middle of Somewhere

Re: differences between PE and non-PE

Post by MikeFish » Tue Mar 15, 2016 2:41 pm

Not anyone related but mechanical still; when Luke from Plush was working on my car he noted some lower arm and ARB Mount differences between my car and his non PE facelift car. I'm nit sure if his car is MY15 or 16 though, as that might explain the difference rather than it being PE related.

User avatar
MikeFish
Cruising
Posts: 15588
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: The Middle of Somewhere

Re: differences between PE and non-PE

Post by MikeFish » Tue Mar 15, 2016 2:43 pm

From memory the difference in power was down to a higher boost and i have a feeling i read possibly slightly higher rev limit.

Post Reply

Return to “RS6 (C7 Typ 4G) 2013-2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 85 guests