Drivers who exceed the speed limit

Off topic chat
Post Reply
amanda1
Top Gear
Posts: 2476
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:42 pm

Drivers who exceed the speed limit

Post by amanda1 » Sat Apr 02, 2011 9:53 pm

Now this is very very sneaky :roll:

Drivers who speed by more than 10mph will escape fines and points on their licences under new proposals which could see many speed cameras brought back into service.
Motorists who qualify will be able to choose to take a speed awareness course, with the money raised from higher fees going to funding for the cameras.

Under the guidelines, motorists can escape prosecution and choose to take a course if they are caught driving at 10 per cent above the speed limit, plus 9mph.
Cameras: Many cameras were decommissioned as a result of funding changes
It means a driver in a 30mph zone could take the course if caught at up to 42mph, while someone on a motorway could take the option if clocked at 86mph, if police agree.

The new threshold is 3mph higher than than previously, and course fees have been raised to up to £100 to finance the network, The Times said.

More...Troops currently fighting in Afghanistan could be out of work by end of the summer

The Times said the guidelines had been agreed by 37 of the 43 police forces, including Manchester, Lincolnshire and Thames Valley, with Oxfordshire becoming the first county to use the scheme to switch 'decommissioned' cameras back on yesterday.

Funding changes and spending cuts forced many police areas to turn off the devices and the Daily Mail revealed in February how more than 40 per cent were switched off.
Oxfordshire saw funding for road safety from the county council cut by £600,000 and so cameras were taken out of service in August, The Times said.

Yesterday, the 72 fixed and 89 mobile sites were turned back on using funds from course fees, Thames Valley Police told the paper.

SPEEDING: THE NEW GUIDELINES
Speed limit Potential speed
30 42
40 53
50 63
60 75
70 86

The force said since the cameras were turned off, fatal accidents had risen by 50 per cent, with 83 people injured in 62 accidents in the six months after they were turned off.

There were 68 injuries in 60 accidents in the same period of the previous year.

Superintendent Rob Povey, head of roads policing for Thames Valley, told the paper:

'We know that speed enforcement does work as a deterrent to motorists.'

And Andrew Howard, head of road safety at the AA, welcomed the scheme, and said they thought other police forces would use money from courses to fund cameras: 'We believe that cameras have to be kept running.

'This is one way of doing it.'

Drivers will be allowed to take only one course every three years, with regular offenders and those who speed beyond the limit facing automatic penalties.
Road safety minister Mike Penning told the Guardian: 'The coalition government is committed to further improving road safety but it is right that local councils decide how best to tackle specific problems in their areas.

'We ended central government funding for new fixed speed cameras because we don't believe we should dictate to councils that they use them as the default solution in reducing accidents.'

In February, the Daily Mail revealed how road deaths dropped 14 per cent in three months while speed cameras were being axed or switched off.

The country has a network of more than 6,000 speed cameras, but During the last year to September, fatalities fell below 2,000 for the first time since records began.

There were 1,900, compared with 2,402 in the year to September 2009.

Total road casualties were down 3 per cent while the number killed or seriously injured is down 8 per cent over the same time.

The figures were seized on by road safety campaigners who believe that the boom in cameras over the past decade has had little to do with life-saving and more to do with fund-raising.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1IOsLzyaB
950 nm torque!

Ohh running bridgestones because they are the best ;)

User avatar
sonny
Cruising
Posts: 10278
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Kent

Re: Drivers who exceed the speed limit

Post by sonny » Sun Apr 03, 2011 1:25 pm

We should all drink and drive, only 25% of accidents are caused by drivers under the influence of alcohol, the reminder 75% was sober.
Money can't buy you love, but it can buy you a well sorted racecar

User avatar
PetrolDave
Cruising
Posts: 7599
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:28 am
Location: Southampton, Hampshire UK

Re: Drivers who exceed the speed limit

Post by PetrolDave » Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:06 am

amanda1 wrote:The force said since the cameras were turned off, fatal accidents had risen by 50 per cent, with 83 people injured in 62 accidents in the six months after they were turned off.

There were 68 injuries in 60 accidents in the same period of the previous year.
Selective use of statistics by Thames Valley Police...

When questioned by the BBC (when I complained about their biased reporting of this issue), TVP said that deaths and serious injuries AT CAMERA SITES were UNCHANGED after speed cameras were turned off.

Cameras on: deaths 0, serious injuries 13
Cameras off: deaths 0, serious injuries 13

So the increase was NOT at speed camera sites, but at other locations in the counties covered by TVP. So how will turning speed cameras back on affect the deaths and serious injuries at other locations???
Gone: 2006 B7 RS4 Avant (Phantom Black)

Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests