I would echo Chris' comments - too small, in fact it nearly got thrown out with the junkmail!, and read most of it elsewhere (including the quarter of the mag dedicated to the new TT) but this may be due to the time it's taken to get this issue out - if it had been more timely, it might have been "news".ChrisG wrote:OK, but I am very disappointed and would like you to read this as constructive criticism!
it is on glossy paper and colour but the presentation seems lacking ...... cannot say what....maybe it's the page size?
how do I know that the size does not reflect the future size, and with little advertising there must be little revenue = few pages - and they are small pages.
the size is too small, most of the contents I have already read elsewhere, and several months ago.
I've missed the cut off of three mags and if not happy a refund but I would have been seeking that and
had this been my first issue it would be my last .
Sorry.
Like Woody I'd prefer to donate to the site running costs, fewer pictures but the technical info is better !!
Very disappointed
Also intended as constructive criticism.