Air conditioning
Posted: Tue May 11, 2021 1:37 pm
Last week my air con packed up.
Went to Kwik Fit to get a re-gas with no improvement.
Kwik Fit left the air con gas brimmed.
With the temp turned to Lo, when I press the AC button, there is no change in the revs and the air doesn’t change temperature.
Booked the car in with Audi (as I have an extendee Audi warranty) and they’ve just rang to tell me the front bumper needs to come off etc. for diagnosis. Should the investigation show that say, a stone flipped up from under the car and damaged an air con component then the warranty wouldn’t cover it.
Obviously I understand the logic of this ‘caveat’ and should it transpire that indeed some form of ‘user error’ caused the problem then it is what it is. Nor would I support any spurious logic e.g., the design of the car is to blame for even allowing e.g., a stone to flip up and damage a component.
My question is
How vulnerably positioned are the air conditioning components? The engine bay looks pretty packed to me and sits behind a bumper and over a plastic under tray.
I guess I’m looking to understand how likely (on the balance of logic and common sense) is it for a component failure to have potentially happen in this way.
Obviously the evidence should prove it one way or another but there is a part of me that would hope Audi would honour even a stone flying into the engine bay - unless the component was particularly exposed or vulnerable which they couldn’t or didn’t design around.
If the unthinkable was to happen should I even be entertaining a stone entering the engine bay as my fault? I figure some might argue there’s a design consideration there.
Putting the bumper back on and realigning the electrics is £1050.
Went to Kwik Fit to get a re-gas with no improvement.
Kwik Fit left the air con gas brimmed.
With the temp turned to Lo, when I press the AC button, there is no change in the revs and the air doesn’t change temperature.
Booked the car in with Audi (as I have an extendee Audi warranty) and they’ve just rang to tell me the front bumper needs to come off etc. for diagnosis. Should the investigation show that say, a stone flipped up from under the car and damaged an air con component then the warranty wouldn’t cover it.
Obviously I understand the logic of this ‘caveat’ and should it transpire that indeed some form of ‘user error’ caused the problem then it is what it is. Nor would I support any spurious logic e.g., the design of the car is to blame for even allowing e.g., a stone to flip up and damage a component.
My question is
How vulnerably positioned are the air conditioning components? The engine bay looks pretty packed to me and sits behind a bumper and over a plastic under tray.
I guess I’m looking to understand how likely (on the balance of logic and common sense) is it for a component failure to have potentially happen in this way.
Obviously the evidence should prove it one way or another but there is a part of me that would hope Audi would honour even a stone flying into the engine bay - unless the component was particularly exposed or vulnerable which they couldn’t or didn’t design around.
If the unthinkable was to happen should I even be entertaining a stone entering the engine bay as my fault? I figure some might argue there’s a design consideration there.
Putting the bumper back on and realigning the electrics is £1050.