Page 1 of 2
MRC 722ps
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 1:43 pm
by Ungjaevel
Gents,
Behold.
I, for one, approve of the numbers... 722 ps, 1025 Nm.... Yummy.
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set ... 647&type=1
Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 1:50 pm
by SuprSi
Really, really want that. If I come across a large sum that'll be the first thing I buy! In sepang, with 'ramics.
I wander how that little 4L V8 is able to make so much more power than the old 4.2L. Very impressive.
Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 11:52 pm
by M1R XE
Great stuff im sure theyll have some more soon developing etc. I can remember first was lik 660 then high 6's. Thats perfect but 750 just to round it off

Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:23 am
by VARSITY
Maybe some new downpipes?
Mix in a bigger cooler?
Some hybrid turbos?
Hmmmmm.... Santa Mihnea??
Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 5:32 pm
by seb de la run
without downpipes is difficult to have 722hp.
Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 6:53 pm
by doodlebug
Filters and map gives 722, no downpipes.
Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 7:21 pm
by seb de la run
remap + air filtes : 670-680cv ...! to have 730cv is necessary to have downpipes.
stock : 577cv
remap + air filter 663cv
remap + air filter + exhaust : 680cv.
you can see my rs6 :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqwQxumplVY
all the tuner i know, can products 680cv with remap...is amazing to have 40cv better than another tuner just with remap + air filter.
for example mtm need DP and catalysit to have 722 :
http://www.mtm-online.de/en/Audi/RS6-C7 ... =RS6C7412q
if you used 104 octane, you can have 722cv just with remap.
Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:44 pm
by SuprSi
There's a reason MRC have won Audi tuner of the year every year since they started the business!

Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 12:43 am
by M1R XE
Yeah see mate your probably right 670-680 is what you would get. But this is MRC and they're as everyone knows fantastic and know they're stuff hence why they've got 722. Don't worry it's no fake Dyno etc here bud most if not all the C6s have been there for tune along with the rest of the Audi's.
Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 11:21 am
by adsgreen
SuprSi wrote:Really, really want that. If I come across a large sum that'll be the first thing I buy! In sepang, with 'ramics.
I wander how that little 4L V8 is able to make so much more power than the old 4.2L. Very impressive.
May be due to the 4.2 has seen so many variations and I wonder if it wasn't the best design for turbo charging. The new 4.0 was built from scratch to be turbocharged and it makes a difference. Also I wonder if the revised turbo location within the 'v' makes it more efficient.
Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:08 pm
by Shinobi675
Everything I've read on it says it's an amazing engine! Hugely efficient compared to the power ratings it can achieve! It appears that designing for efficiency really pays off for performance!
Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:52 pm
by W8PMC
Not that difficult to get a headline figure from a dyno, we all know how it works:)
From personal experience i'd be shitting myself putting that level of torque through an Audi slush box, but call me a cynic who's had a couple go bang (albeit not C7's).
MRC are an awesome outfit & i bet that car's a total monster.
Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:55 pm
by doodlebug
It's ZF 8 speed, found all over. Only the C5 that had a choco box.
Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:59 pm
by W8PMC
doodlebug wrote:It's ZF 8 speed, found all over. Only the C5 that had a choco box.
Still a regular slush box & the C6 had a soft box too. Agree however that the new ZF is an improvement over the previous incarnations, but then it couldn't have been worse:)
Re: MRC 722ps
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 10:00 pm
by doodlebug
How's the C6 had a soft box? Don't recall any failing.