I bet 700PS shifts!!!
I actually wanted to come back to this...
I've often wondered about this...harrier wrote:Tadass910, not sure what your fuel enquiry is? If you actually use 700 bhp instead of 560 bhp to shift your 2 tonne car, and it's very seductive, believe me, then basic physics states you will need more energy/fuel. There's no free energy, so nothing for nothing. The tuning companies suggest you might get more efficient combustion with their remapps, so if you cruise at the same speed or accelerate at the same rate, i.e. use the same power, then if they are right you should be using less fuel and so doing more mpg - small margins though, I suspect. You will definitely be able to burn more fuel and therefore accelerate quicker and travel faster, which is the chief objective. Trust me, you have to hold on to the steering wheel tighter, so you don't loose your grasp; its the first time driving all sorts of high performance cars that I'd ever really noticed that!
So an engine typically has a thermal efficiency of something like 25%, and the other 75% is wasted (mainly as heat).
So a turbo takes some of the otherwise wasted energy and feeds it back into the system, to do more work--> making the engine for thermally efficient.
So then, if you increase the turbo's effect (more boost), then do you not increase the efficiency more?
On the other hand, you're feeding more fuel in. So can fuel efficiency go down even as thermal efficiency goes up?
Any mechanical or chemical engineers about? Not fake ones like me...
