Brake Thread - OEM Ceramics vs OEM Steel

5.0 V10 50v biturbo - 571 bhp
User avatar
Shinobi675
5th Gear
Posts: 1368
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:04 pm

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by Shinobi675 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:59 am

Found it!!!!

So this is a great article! Well written impartial and factual.

http://api.app.evo.co.uk/editions/uk.co ... b/web.html

Well worth 10 minutes!
996 C4S, B8 RS4, CBR600RR & a little ZXR400

User avatar
IanH755
Top Gear
Posts: 2071
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:50 pm
Location: Stoke and Norfolk

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by IanH755 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:00 am

Shinobi - As you can see people just see a "trigger" word (in this case "ceramics") and go off on a rant as you've seen without actually reading what is posted. Apparently as a non-ceramic owner I'm not allowed to even agree that ceramics are better without being argued with :D

David - We are both agreeing that the performance of ceramics is better yet for an unknown reason you are still trying make it sound like I am saying ceramics are bad and steels are the best thing ever and your deliberate mis-interpretation of my comments is starting to grate.

I getting very fed up of saying this to you but for what feels like the dozenth time - please read my actual posts and not what you "think" I've said. My concern is now and always has been since my very first post about this, their durability and therefore their replacement cost after being used on the track and *NOT* their performance which is the direct opposite of what you are telling me I am saying in your replies.

Anyway, I can not make my point any more simply so if people still want to deliberately mis-interpret my post then I refuse to waste any more of my time discussing it with them.
***OLD*** Daytona C5 RS6 Avant - MRC'd - 500HP & 820NM (PistonHeads Link).

***NEW*** Daytona C6 RS6 Avant - MRC'd - 925HP & 1150NM (PistonHeads Link)

User avatar
Shinobi675
5th Gear
Posts: 1368
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:04 pm

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by Shinobi675 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:04 am

IanH755 wrote:Shinobi - As you can see people just see a "trigger" word (in this case "ceramics") and go off on a rant as you've seen without actually reading what is posted. Apparently as a non-ceramic owner I'm not allowed to even agree that ceramics are better without being argued with :D
Sorry mate! One flippant comment from me and it went proper downhill...

I think your dedication, knowledge and most importantly communication are second to none! You really have done a great job here and both walked us all through what you have done; but more importantly why you decided those things.

You've got great results and your methods are highly efficient! Tom, you're in that category too mate!

So back to the original point of this thread, your awesome car! Top work.
996 C4S, B8 RS4, CBR600RR & a little ZXR400

User avatar
Shinobi675
5th Gear
Posts: 1368
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:04 pm

Re: Brake Thread - OEM Ceramics vs OEM Steel

Post by Shinobi675 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:06 am

Hi guys,

So I think I mentioned this arrival before on this thread but couldn't find it... Here it is!

http://api.app.evo.co.uk/editions/uk.co ... b/web.html

So rather than continuing on Ian's thread... Let's bring the cult back in here...
996 C4S, B8 RS4, CBR600RR & a little ZXR400

User avatar
classba
Top Gear
Posts: 1814
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:11 am

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by classba » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:22 am

Ian, I'm not ranking and I'm too getting really fed up of hearing you stating so many times that steels are better than ceramics on the track because of wear issues ( not proven in reality).

I just leave this here then.

http://www.motorward.com/2009/03/more-on-audi-r8-gt3/

yeah.... your car is awesome :biggrin3:
Last edited by classba on Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Too much power is barely enough.

rtd
Cruising
Posts: 2542
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by rtd » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:25 am

classba wrote:Ian, I'm not ranking and I'm too getting fed up of hearing you stating so many times that steels are better than ceramics on the track because of wear issues ( not proven in reality).

I just leave this here then.

http://www.motorward.com/2009/03/more-on-audi-r8-gt3/
david that link is not even relevant here I bet those ceramics bear almost no relation to the ones used on the C6
Volvo XC90
C7 - RS6
C6 - RS6
B5 - RS4

TomRS
4th Gear
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 1:36 pm
Location: Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by TomRS » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:28 am

Shinobi675 wrote:
IanH755 wrote:Shinobi - As you can see people just see a "trigger" word (in this case "ceramics") and go off on a rant as you've seen without actually reading what is posted. Apparently as a non-ceramic owner I'm not allowed to even agree that ceramics are better without being argued with :D
Sorry mate! One flippant comment from me and it went proper downhill...

I think your dedication, knowledge and most importantly communication are second to none! You really have done a great job here and both walked us all through what you have done; but more importantly why you decided those things.

You've got great results and your methods are highly efficient! Tom, you're in that category too mate!

So back to the original point of this thread, your awesome car! Top work.
Thanks :)

As a final note it really is more about replacement cost then anything else, i mean going down to basics im a poor boy and cant afford expensive things hahaha!


But jokes aside, i would rather replace the steels and not worry about ruining the Ceramics, theres quite a fair bit dotted about the interwebs of melted ceramics due to nurburgring laps etc.
Maybe its the driver who knows, all i know is if i spent 8k on a set of ramics and melted them on a track day i really wouldnt be able to afford to replace them, i dont have a bottomless pit of cash.
Its why i do most of my own work on the car myself, not only that but i do actually enjoy working on the car, i like knowing everything i can rather then paying a garage to do it.... most of the time i'll do a better job anyway. and im not talking about certainly specialiest places i.e Ricky at REP i trust his work but there are few and far between who get my trust.

And if i break something i know i've broke it, i wont bodge it or hide it away, it'll get sorted properly.


As for the steels vs ramics again Dave your not paying attension, as i say above its a cost thing, you might have 8 grand to replace all 4 rotors but i dont, and im sure as hell Ian has better things to spend his money on.
As for that article, the compound used on those is completely different to road ceramics so again a slightly useless article as interesting as it was to read.
Last edited by TomRS on Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Audi RS4 B5 + Audi Q7 4.2TDi
Gone but not forgotten :smile_smoking:
2017 Mercedes E63S W213 1033/1400nm
2013 Mercedes E63S W212 740/1200nm
2010 Nissan GT-R SVM 680R
2010 RS6 C6 Avant Stage 2 730/1088nm

User avatar
classba
Top Gear
Posts: 1814
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:11 am

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by classba » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:29 am

rtd wrote:
classba wrote:Ian, I'm not ranking and I'm too getting fed up of hearing you stating so many times that steels are better than ceramics on the track because of wear issues ( not proven in reality).

I just leave this here then.

http://www.motorward.com/2009/03/more-on-audi-r8-gt3/
david that link is not even relevant here I bet those ceramics bear almost no relation to the ones used on the C6
why not... it is stated here so many times that steels are better than ceramics for track use in general.
Too much power is barely enough.

User avatar
classba
Top Gear
Posts: 1814
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:11 am

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by classba » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:34 am

TomRS wrote:
Shinobi675 wrote:
IanH755 wrote:Shinobi - As you can see people just see a "trigger" word (in this case "ceramics") and go off on a rant as you've seen without actually reading what is posted. Apparently as a non-ceramic owner I'm not allowed to even agree that ceramics are better without being argued with :D
Sorry mate! One flippant comment from me and it went proper downhill...

I think your dedication, knowledge and most importantly communication are second to none! You really have done a great job here and both walked us all through what you have done; but more importantly why you decided those things.

You've got great results and your methods are highly efficient! Tom, you're in that category too mate!

So back to the original point of this thread, your awesome car! Top work.
Thanks :)

As a final note it really is more about replacement cost then anything else, i mean going down to basics im a poor boy and cant afford expensive things hahaha!


But jokes aside, i would rather replace the steels and not worry about ruining the Ceramics, theres quite a fair bit dotted about the interwebs of melted ceramics due to nurburgring laps etc.
Maybe its the driver who knows, all i know is if i spent 8k on a set of ramics and melted them on a track day i really wouldnt be able to afford to replace them, i dont have a bottomless pit of cash.
Its why i do most of my own work on the car myself, not only that but i do actually enjoy working on the car, i like knowing everything i can rather then paying a garage to do it.... most of the time i'll do a better job anyway. and im not talking about certainly specialiest places i.e Ricky at REP i trust his work but there are few and far between who get my trust.

And if i break something i know i've broke it, i wont bodge it or hide it away, it'll get sorted properly.


As for the steels vs ramics again Dave your not paying attension, as i say above its a cost thing, you might have 8 grand to replace all 4 rotors but i dont, and im sure as hell Ian has better things to spend his money on.
As for that article, the compound used on those is completely different to road ceramics so again a slightly useless article as interesting as it was to read.
Tom... thank you for making that clear. so its not the wear issue for you...its the cost.
Too much power is barely enough.

rtd
Cruising
Posts: 2542
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by rtd » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:35 am

david most people have said and TomRS actually wrote a very informative post on the different compound make up of ceramic racing discs over road discs - we all know a track/race focused car will have an entirely different brake setup to a road car.

on the c7 forum someone posted about a c7 having its ceramics replaced after owner did a day at the ring! £12k bill.............
Volvo XC90
C7 - RS6
C6 - RS6
B5 - RS4

User avatar
classba
Top Gear
Posts: 1814
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:11 am

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by classba » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:37 am

rtd wrote:david most people have said and TomRS actually wrote a very informative post on the different compound make up of ceramic racing discs over road discs - we all know a track/race focused car will have an entirely different brake setup to a road car.

on the c7 forum someone posted about a c7 having its ceramics replaced after owner did a day at the ring! £12k bill.............
OK.. and a friend of mine with a c7 with AP steels were totally fecked and warped less than 1k road miles.

Ian... ask BG because they had to skim them... he got an full refund instead of installing them AP's.
Last edited by classba on Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Too much power is barely enough.

User avatar
Shinobi675
5th Gear
Posts: 1368
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:04 pm

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by Shinobi675 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:38 am

rtd wrote:david most people have said and TomRS actually wrote a very informative post on the different compound make up of ceramic racing discs over road discs - we all know a track/race focused car will have an entirely different brake setup to a road car.

on the c7 forum someone posted about a c7 having its ceramics replaced after owner did a day at the ring! £12k bill.............
I think it was twice!

But this is proper off topic, let's take it over to the ceramics vs steels thread...
996 C4S, B8 RS4, CBR600RR & a little ZXR400

User avatar
stevo55
5th Gear
Posts: 1160
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2016 10:17 am
Location: Suffolk

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by stevo55 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:40 am

Image
This thread has started to look like a normal Pistonheads Gassing Station discussion...
Current:
2012 Land Rover Defender XS Utility Full Tweaked Spectre conversion
Former:
2003 C5 RS6- forum car and well sorted.
2016 R8 V10 Plus.
2019 E63s AMG 4Matic Estate.
2015 C7 RS6 Misano Red Performance Plus and unicorn miles
2018 B9 RS5 coupe. Milltek Non-Res Exhaust.
2017 BMW M3 Competition Pack.
2015 A45 AMG.Overrated POS.
2016 C7 RS6 Panther black.
2009 C6 RS6 phantom black saloon. Milltek
2006 BMW Z4M Roadster.
2004 Alpina Roadster.
1994 E34 M5 Saloon

User avatar
Shinobi675
5th Gear
Posts: 1368
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:04 pm

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by Shinobi675 » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:41 am

stevo55 wrote:Image
This thread has started to look like a normal Pistonheads Gassing Station discussion...
Now that statement is surely enough to end this off topic thingy in its tracks ;)
996 C4S, B8 RS4, CBR600RR & a little ZXR400

rtd
Cruising
Posts: 2542
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: My 900+ spec

Post by rtd » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:44 am

classba wrote:
rtd wrote:david most people have said and TomRS actually wrote a very informative post on the different compound make up of ceramic racing discs over road discs - we all know a track/race focused car will have an entirely different brake setup to a road car.

on the c7 forum someone posted about a c7 having its ceramics replaced after owner did a day at the ring! £12k bill.............
OK.. and a friend of mine with a c7 with AP steels were totally fecked and warped less than 1k road miles.
well I've had ceramics on mine for the last 11k and mine had only done 13k when I got them. i've only used them for fast private road use - combination of big long roads plus a and b roads. and all I can say from my limited experience and my car has been setup for fast road use is that I don't think the discs would take a morning or afternoon of hard driving around a track. just my thoughts. for the road ceramics all day long. now lets all have a group hug :biggrin3:
Volvo XC90
C7 - RS6
C6 - RS6
B5 - RS4

Post Reply

Return to “RS6 / RS6 Plus (C6 Typ 4F) 2008-2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 202 guests