Is the RS4 (B7) truly the best “all roundâ€
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:21 pm
Wanted to create a thread to openly and honestly discuss this as I am struggling to see what can compare with it. Not only this but some on here are struggling for an option to move to and this may draw out some good alternatives.
The RS4 seems to rank highly in most situations, if not top!
So where do we start then:
Performance:
Now most on here will know the usual stats:
0 – 62 in 4.8s
0 – 100 in 10.7s
These numbers are matched by a few cars out there or, in the case of the C63, bettered but there is not a whole lot in it, on a dry day! Bring on some rain or even a damp surface and things immediately turn in favour of the RS4…..big time!
Autocar do tests on a dry circuit and on a wet circuit (two different tracks by the way).
Here are some examples of lap times from them:
Car Dry lap Wet lap
RS4 (B7) 1.16.9 (track greasy) 1.06.4
M5 1.16.15 1.08.35
Lambo LP640 1.14.7 1.16.5
Porsche GT3 1.12.5 1.19.1
Some other times are missing from this I know, most importantly the M3 and the C63. On the C63 it lapped 1s faster on the dry track but 5s slower on the wet track (I don’t have the exact times, to tenths, though).
The M5 is very impressive in both conditions and this demonstrates it’s top-notch chassis set up and near perfect weight distribution on it’s axles. Thing is the RS4 is only three quarters of a second off it in the dry (with 100hp less) but 2s faster in the wet.
Top Gear tested the M3, RS4 and C63 in Spain and whilst the M3 was the fastest round the track they used (the RS4 and the C63 were matched) they could not separate any of the cars for sheer brilliance.
Verdict: For super car performance in any weather the RS4 has to take the honours.
Practicality:
Looking at space there are a few cars that are pretty good but most likely the C63 takes it, having a bit more space (M5 is a class size up). That said the RS4 and M3 both have sufficient space for family use or 4 adults and luggage. Lexus IS-F is probably pretty useful also.
Verdict: C63
Looks:
RS4 – “Phatâ€
The RS4 seems to rank highly in most situations, if not top!
So where do we start then:
Performance:
Now most on here will know the usual stats:
0 – 62 in 4.8s
0 – 100 in 10.7s
These numbers are matched by a few cars out there or, in the case of the C63, bettered but there is not a whole lot in it, on a dry day! Bring on some rain or even a damp surface and things immediately turn in favour of the RS4…..big time!
Autocar do tests on a dry circuit and on a wet circuit (two different tracks by the way).
Here are some examples of lap times from them:
Car Dry lap Wet lap
RS4 (B7) 1.16.9 (track greasy) 1.06.4
M5 1.16.15 1.08.35
Lambo LP640 1.14.7 1.16.5
Porsche GT3 1.12.5 1.19.1
Some other times are missing from this I know, most importantly the M3 and the C63. On the C63 it lapped 1s faster on the dry track but 5s slower on the wet track (I don’t have the exact times, to tenths, though).
The M5 is very impressive in both conditions and this demonstrates it’s top-notch chassis set up and near perfect weight distribution on it’s axles. Thing is the RS4 is only three quarters of a second off it in the dry (with 100hp less) but 2s faster in the wet.
Top Gear tested the M3, RS4 and C63 in Spain and whilst the M3 was the fastest round the track they used (the RS4 and the C63 were matched) they could not separate any of the cars for sheer brilliance.
Verdict: For super car performance in any weather the RS4 has to take the honours.
Practicality:
Looking at space there are a few cars that are pretty good but most likely the C63 takes it, having a bit more space (M5 is a class size up). That said the RS4 and M3 both have sufficient space for family use or 4 adults and luggage. Lexus IS-F is probably pretty useful also.
Verdict: C63
Looks:
RS4 – “Phatâ€