Request for gents with a data logger:

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
Post Reply
User avatar
Billy
3rd Gear
Posts: 287
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 3:38 pm

Post by Billy » Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:59 pm

Yes the valves were cleaned again.

As far as I'm aware there are no mods to the crankcase breather system.

User avatar
hogster
1st Gear
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Surrey

Post by hogster » Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:24 am

Rather bored this evening so I took the car out for some runs..

Standard saloon, 50k
1.5 degree celcius, flat surface, wet surface.

7.8
7.9
7.6
7.7
7.6

First two were nailing it at 2800rpm the next at 2000rpm all measured from 3k to 8k in third.

Edit; half tank v-power, me 80kgs and around 100kgs in the boot.

Dave
07 Avus silver saloon
09 TTS

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:26 am

hogster wrote:Rather bored this evening so I took the car out for some runs..

Standard saloon, 50k
1.5 degree celcius, flat surface, wet surface.

7.8
7.9
7.6
7.7
7.6

First two were nailing it at 2800rpm the next at 2000rpm all measured from 3k to 8k in third.

Edit; half tank v-power, me 80kgs and around 100kgs in the boot.

Dave
I'm counting the 100kg in the trunk as a passenger, lol

those are good times
were the valves cleaned?
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe...Albert Einstein

User avatar
hogster
1st Gear
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Surrey

Post by hogster » Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:44 am

The mrs :lol: I will get her out tomorrow and do some more runs, car has had a new inlet manifold about 10k ago not sure if that would make a difference?

Car was missing its 'kick' at 5500rpm last year and only made 330 on a dyno, turned out to be a leak in the vacuum. have not had it on a dyno since as I am happy with it.
07 Avus silver saloon
09 TTS

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:05 am

here's some interesting ones, just done by a guy on another forum
US sedan 33k miles, valves just cleaned(before & after pics were posted, they were cruddy), less than 100 miles ago
60f, fuel load?, 95 oct (mixed race gas), only mod ECS H pipe

8.74
8.59
8.65
8.44
avg 8.6

I've asked for the 'before' numbers if he has them

SR71
5th Gear
Posts: 1376
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:58 am

Post by SR71 » Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:26 am

One too many sodas I reckon....

;-)
58 C6 RS6 Stage 2+
58 C6 A6 Allroad 2.7 TDi

Previous:

2000 B5 S4 MRC 550 Saloon
2007 B7 RS4 Saloon
1994 S2 Coupe

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Mon May 10, 2010 10:43 am

Ok, just had a look at this.

I remain unconvinced about the accuracy, the completeness, the relevance of this.

But then I am not so easily convinced, or I don't understand? :lol:

User avatar
S2tuner
Trader (Expired)
Posts: 1559
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Post by S2tuner » Mon May 10, 2010 10:54 am

What I do seem to notice, is that some of the cars producing "bogus" numbers on those cr@p RRs that ArthurPE has been pissing on for the last few weeks do in fact run faster times than cars that were uncleaned and unmodded. Funny or what?

SR71
5th Gear
Posts: 1376
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:58 am

Post by SR71 » Mon May 10, 2010 11:07 am

Someone do us a favour and run some of the individual car data through http://www.cartestsoftware.com/index.php

I used to muck around with this software when it was free back in the 90's...

You can alter almost everything you could possibly want to along with sensitivity analyses etc etc
58 C6 RS6 Stage 2+
58 C6 A6 Allroad 2.7 TDi

Previous:

2000 B5 S4 MRC 550 Saloon
2007 B7 RS4 Saloon
1994 S2 Coupe

P_G
Cruising
Posts: 8249
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Post by P_G » Mon May 10, 2010 11:35 am

S2tuner wrote:What I do seem to notice, is that some of the cars producing "bogus" numbers on those cr@p RRs that ArthurPE has been pissing on for the last few weeks do in fact run faster times than cars that were uncleaned and unmodded. Funny or what?
Don't start that one again please.

User avatar
S2tuner
Trader (Expired)
Posts: 1559
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Post by S2tuner » Mon May 10, 2010 12:05 pm

P_G wrote:
S2tuner wrote:What I do seem to notice, is that some of the cars producing "bogus" numbers on those cr@p RRs that ArthurPE has been pissing on for the last few weeks do in fact run faster times than cars that were uncleaned and unmodded. Funny or what?
Don't start that one again please.
Why? because I have a "vested interest"?

P_G
Cruising
Posts: 8249
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Post by P_G » Mon May 10, 2010 12:11 pm

Because it has been covered so many times before; it's an inaccurate measurement of car power output and only good as a baseline and comparsion for modifications on a car by car basis.

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Mon May 10, 2010 12:24 pm

S2tuner wrote:
P_G wrote:
S2tuner wrote:What I do seem to notice, is that some of the cars producing "bogus" numbers on those cr@p RRs that ArthurPE has been pissing on for the last few weeks do in fact run faster times than cars that were uncleaned and unmodded. Funny or what?
Don't start that one again please.
Why? because I have a "vested interest"?
P_G, there is no "that one again".. you should know that Arthur keeps banging on about this all the time as the holy grail.

Some are upfront and declare their interest, others do not. I am a layman with a long term interest in the B7 RS4.

The car is still relatively young and yet there has beeen so much "smoke" about this car, and far more than probably all the other Audis put together. So I very much welcome credible information on this subject.
:)

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Mon May 10, 2010 12:28 pm

P_G wrote:... it's an inaccurate measurement of car power output
Correct
P_G wrote: ... and only good as a baseline and comparsion for modifications on a car by car basis.
Not even that, unless the circumstances are exactly the same
Last edited by Sims on Mon May 10, 2010 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mac4RS
4th Gear
Posts: 848
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:22 am
Location: Colchester

Post by mac4RS » Mon May 10, 2010 12:38 pm

The car is still relatively young and yet there has beeen so much "smoke" about this car
And most of the 'smoke' comes from you... :wink:

Hey Sims, you a mate of russianM3dude? :twisted:

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 99 guests