Request for gents with a data logger:
Rather bored this evening so I took the car out for some runs..
Standard saloon, 50k
1.5 degree celcius, flat surface, wet surface.
7.8
7.9
7.6
7.7
7.6
First two were nailing it at 2800rpm the next at 2000rpm all measured from 3k to 8k in third.
Edit; half tank v-power, me 80kgs and around 100kgs in the boot.
Dave
Standard saloon, 50k
1.5 degree celcius, flat surface, wet surface.
7.8
7.9
7.6
7.7
7.6
First two were nailing it at 2800rpm the next at 2000rpm all measured from 3k to 8k in third.
Edit; half tank v-power, me 80kgs and around 100kgs in the boot.
Dave
07 Avus silver saloon
09 TTS
09 TTS
I'm counting the 100kg in the trunk as a passenger, lolhogster wrote:Rather bored this evening so I took the car out for some runs..
Standard saloon, 50k
1.5 degree celcius, flat surface, wet surface.
7.8
7.9
7.6
7.7
7.6
First two were nailing it at 2800rpm the next at 2000rpm all measured from 3k to 8k in third.
Edit; half tank v-power, me 80kgs and around 100kgs in the boot.
Dave
those are good times
were the valves cleaned?
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe...Albert Einstein
The mrs
I will get her out tomorrow and do some more runs, car has had a new inlet manifold about 10k ago not sure if that would make a difference?
Car was missing its 'kick' at 5500rpm last year and only made 330 on a dyno, turned out to be a leak in the vacuum. have not had it on a dyno since as I am happy with it.

Car was missing its 'kick' at 5500rpm last year and only made 330 on a dyno, turned out to be a leak in the vacuum. have not had it on a dyno since as I am happy with it.
07 Avus silver saloon
09 TTS
09 TTS
here's some interesting ones, just done by a guy on another forum
US sedan 33k miles, valves just cleaned(before & after pics were posted, they were cruddy), less than 100 miles ago
60f, fuel load?, 95 oct (mixed race gas), only mod ECS H pipe
8.74
8.59
8.65
8.44
avg 8.6
I've asked for the 'before' numbers if he has them
US sedan 33k miles, valves just cleaned(before & after pics were posted, they were cruddy), less than 100 miles ago
60f, fuel load?, 95 oct (mixed race gas), only mod ECS H pipe
8.74
8.59
8.65
8.44
avg 8.6
I've asked for the 'before' numbers if he has them
Someone do us a favour and run some of the individual car data through http://www.cartestsoftware.com/index.php
I used to muck around with this software when it was free back in the 90's...
You can alter almost everything you could possibly want to along with sensitivity analyses etc etc
I used to muck around with this software when it was free back in the 90's...
You can alter almost everything you could possibly want to along with sensitivity analyses etc etc
58 C6 RS6 Stage 2+
58 C6 A6 Allroad 2.7 TDi
Previous:
2000 B5 S4 MRC 550 Saloon
2007 B7 RS4 Saloon
1994 S2 Coupe
58 C6 A6 Allroad 2.7 TDi
Previous:
2000 B5 S4 MRC 550 Saloon
2007 B7 RS4 Saloon
1994 S2 Coupe
Why? because I have a "vested interest"?P_G wrote:Don't start that one again please.S2tuner wrote:What I do seem to notice, is that some of the cars producing "bogus" numbers on those cr@p RRs that ArthurPE has been pissing on for the last few weeks do in fact run faster times than cars that were uncleaned and unmodded. Funny or what?
P_G, there is no "that one again".. you should know that Arthur keeps banging on about this all the time as the holy grail.S2tuner wrote:Why? because I have a "vested interest"?P_G wrote:Don't start that one again please.S2tuner wrote:What I do seem to notice, is that some of the cars producing "bogus" numbers on those cr@p RRs that ArthurPE has been pissing on for the last few weeks do in fact run faster times than cars that were uncleaned and unmodded. Funny or what?
Some are upfront and declare their interest, others do not. I am a layman with a long term interest in the B7 RS4.
The car is still relatively young and yet there has beeen so much "smoke" about this car, and far more than probably all the other Audis put together. So I very much welcome credible information on this subject.

CorrectP_G wrote:... it's an inaccurate measurement of car power output
Not even that, unless the circumstances are exactly the sameP_G wrote: ... and only good as a baseline and comparsion for modifications on a car by car basis.
Last edited by Sims on Mon May 10, 2010 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 99 guests