Dyno Bullshit!!

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:34 am

13.3/104 is pretty good actually...

the average I've seen for sedans, by professional testers, under controlled conditions is ~13/108 (avg of 3 tests)
so for your car being heavier, not on a prep'ed strip, etc., Id say you did damn well...


what were the weather conditions?
humidity
temp
atm press
altitude? at sea level?

User avatar
Gazzer68
3rd Gear
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 11:15 pm

Post by Gazzer68 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 8:16 am

Weather good
Temp 63deg cel
press 990mbar
reasonably flat road, not runway quality though !
07/07 RS4 Avant Mugello Blue

SR71
5th Gear
Posts: 1376
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:58 am

Post by SR71 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:52 am

Guys/Gals,

Whatever the numbers I just can't understand why owners are not writing to Audi about the fact that every single B7 RS4 that has been opened up, regardless of driving style, oil in service, CEL's, mis-fires etc etc shows "excessive" deposition in the inlet! The jury is NOT out on this.

Quote the demonstrated difference cleaning the inlet makes to performance as measured by MRC and/or AntoRS4 and/or SilverRS4.

Whether cleaning takes you to 380, 414 or 430hp isn't the point! The point is, the engine is slowly gumming itself up!

I have just fired off a 4 page letter to corporate Audi about it saying what I want done about it in my case.

It doesn't make sense IMHO moaning about the DRC and not this problem. Which problem has the potential to be more serious?

We'll see whether they stone-wall me like they did RI_RS4, but the point is, it was only when significant numbers of people started writing about the DRC issue that it got addressed.

The same will surely apply in this case.

What have you got to lose for the sake of another letter?

Unless I'm gagged, I'll be posting the results of my letter if I get a reply.
58 C6 RS6 Stage 2+
58 C6 A6 Allroad 2.7 TDi

Previous:

2000 B5 S4 MRC 550 Saloon
2007 B7 RS4 Saloon
1994 S2 Coupe

Dom81
Top Gear
Posts: 2124
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:00 am
Location: London

Post by Dom81 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 10:06 am

SR71 wrote:Unless I'm gagged, I'll be posting the results of my letter if I get a reply.
And if you are gagged, we'll all expect a PM instead :wink:
2007 Daytona RS4 Avant

User avatar
klauster
Top Gear
Posts: 2252
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:57 am
Location: Yorkshire

Post by klauster » Wed Apr 29, 2009 10:10 am

Dependant on Audi York's findings tomorrow, I will be writing a letter
RS3 8P 2013 Phantom Black with Ally Pack and Black Optics Grille | LED Interior and number plate lights - GONE :(
RS4 B7 2006 Phantom Black with Titan alloys and mirrors - GONE :(

User avatar
PetrolDave
Cruising
Posts: 7599
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:28 am
Location: Southampton, Hampshire UK

Post by PetrolDave » Wed Apr 29, 2009 1:10 pm

The opposite point is that every IC engine always has, and probably always will, "gum itself up - and that WILL result in a loss of performance. The only issue as I see it is whether the RS4 does this to a greater extent than other cars? And given that links to owners of other FSI engines shows they have a similar problem then it's not "peculiar" to the RS4. It MAY be an effect of the poor oil separator design on a FSI engine - but if it is then we need ALL FSI owners to get together not just RS4 owners.

DRC affected a large percentage of cars here, but there seems to be a MUCH lower percentage complaining of power loss (ignoring dyno figures which have no real world value as absolute numbers).

I've had my RS4 nearly 3 years doing a mixture of urban, rural and motorway driving for just under 30,000 miles and it still has significantly more performance than my previous S4s had - so I'm not complaining of being down on power.
Gone: 2006 B7 RS4 Avant (Phantom Black)

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: highrise and 132 guests