coming soon!!

[RIV]

This is all looking good, one thing though! You gotta take that spoiler off
Please

[R1RS4]

internals are factory fully forged,its all about the tune and fueling ,the goal is 600 plus awhp

Surely you must be looking for a lot more, the proven TTS will produce 600+ and takes a couple of weeks to fit
With price on the internet

With your fabrication and parts you have to be looking at 18k + even if you get it to a production status?

[PetrolDave]

internals are factory fully forged,its all about the tune and fueling ,the goal is 600 plus awhp

Surely you must be looking for a lot more, the proven TTS will produce 600+ and takes a couple of weeks to fit

And given that people like Heffner are already claiming up to 690 engine bhp (600whp) on 100octane (US rating) fuel without engine mods for their TT on an R8 V8 (which is the same engine) http://heffnersperformance.net/

[JCviggen]

the proven TTS will produce 600+ and takes a couple of weeks to fit

The TTS does 600+ crank not 600 at the wheels. I don't think the TTS cars would break 450 wheel horsepower on a dynojet type dyno - I do believe the MRC dynoes are somewhat optimistic.

[SuprSi]

Hmm, 600awhp, so that should be roughly 720 at the crank assuming ~20% losses.. Nuts!

I do believe the MRC dynoes are somewhat optimistic.

I dissagree about the MRC dyno being optimistic (call me biased if you want), Surrey rolling road measured my car at 515hp or 522ps, and that was without the powerful intercooler blowers MRC use, seems about right to me.

[nij]

Hmm, 600awhp, so that should be roughly 720 at the crank assuming ~20% losses.. Nuts!

I do believe the MRC dynoes are somewhat optimistic.

I dissagree about the MRC dyno being optimistic (call me biased if you want), Surrey rolling road measured my car at 515hp or 522ps, and that was without the powerful intercooler blowers MRC use, seems about right to me.

+1

I had my car on MRC's and Motoscope's (Dastek) dyno on the same day, and it made 31bhp more on Motoscope's.

[Chargedrs4]

[Shinobi675]

Idiot question alert! Is there any problems with putting the intercooler in front of the rad? The rad will be getting warmer air now.

[jaysrs4]

No, the efficiencies of an FMIC allow air to pass straight through. However if the core is too thick then it reduces airflow and that can cause overheating.

So choosing the right core of intercooler is pretty critical I would say.

[JCviggen]

Idiot question alert! Is there any problems with putting the intercooler in front of the rad? The rad will be getting warmer air now.

Not much of a worry unless you'd go to a trackday...in Dubai.

The (water) cooling system of a car is always built for the worst case scenario. 40 deg C with AC on etc...note that the AC condenser also sits in front of the main radiator.

The fan will come on and suck air through the rads just fine when airflow demands are not met from simply driving along.

[Shinobi675]

No worries of that here today! It's cold and the wind is the worst I've felt for years!

Cheers for the replies guys, much appreciated.

[RossDagley]

The endtank on the intercooler there is quite inefficient. Is that something you'll change if you end up selling a kit?

[Chargedrs4]

The endtank on the intercooler there is quite inefficient. Is that something you'll change if you end up selling a kit?

nothing wrong whith end thanks they flow very well actually we tested them
we also let the engine idle for 30 mn and give it some revs the intercooler stayed freezing cold

[Chargedrs4]

[Chargedrs4]