Happening in a FSI engine near you...now!

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
rAudiguy
5th Gear
Posts: 1363
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:05 pm
Location: Berkshire

Post by rAudiguy » Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:21 pm

You'll see on the weekend!!!:wink:
Current car..... hmmmmm????
RS4 B7 Gone
RS6 C5 Gone
M3 E46 smg Gone
S3 Gone

User avatar
sonny
Cruising
Posts: 10278
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Kent

Post by sonny » Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:22 pm

pippyrips wrote:Have no fear silver, all under control :)

Wynns do make an fsi cleaning product, (I've got some in the shed!) however i didn't use it before the manifold was opened up as I wanted to show the true state of the inside. I may well use the wynns product to try and stop buildup from happening again once cleaned along with a.n. other method yet to be confirmed.
So are you going to put the manifold back on and then use the Wynns product and then re-inspect?..would be very useful to see if the product actually works, and or to see how many applications is needed to remove the build up.

How many other FSI engines (Pre B7 RS) have Audi put i there cars, surly that are fully aware of these symptoms.
Money can't buy you love, but it can buy you a well sorted racecar

Marcus-RS4
4th Gear
Posts: 597
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:57 pm

Post by Marcus-RS4 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:22 pm

Is anyone going to Audi with their findings... would love to see an explanation about this...!?

simonhill
1st Gear
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 5:47 pm

Post by simonhill » Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:34 pm

I am absolutely stunned!!! I have rebuilt a few engines over the years and I can honestly say that I have never seen a 100,000 mile engine let alone a 19,000 mile engine in that kind of condition. The valve stem oil seals will need replacing in the very near future looking at those valves. Dread to think what the valve seats look like. Has anyone got a higher mileage car that they are willing to open up to have a look inside? Could this be a reason why so many cars have a large power difference when dyno'd?

User avatar
Winterrunner
Neutral
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:59 am
Location: New England

Post by Winterrunner » Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:45 pm

Link to Whynn's FSI product please?

SR71
5th Gear
Posts: 1376
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:58 am

Post by SR71 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:13 pm

Well we expected as much...

I'm sorry but Wynn's isn't the solution in my opinion, even if that deposit is still "wet".

What did MRC say about the level of contamination Rob?
58 C6 RS6 Stage 2+
58 C6 A6 Allroad 2.7 TDi

Previous:

2000 B5 S4 MRC 550 Saloon
2007 B7 RS4 Saloon
1994 S2 Coupe

Marcus-RS4
4th Gear
Posts: 597
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:57 pm

Post by Marcus-RS4 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:16 pm

simonhill wrote:I am absolutely stunned!!! I have rebuilt a few engines over the years and I can honestly say that I have never seen a 100,000 mile engine let alone a 19,000 mile engine in that kind of condition. The valve stem oil seals will need replacing in the very near future looking at those valves. Dread to think what the valve seats look like. Has anyone got a higher mileage car that they are willing to open up to have a look inside? Could this be a reason why so many cars have a large power difference when dyno'd?
Who bought APM's car?? I wanna see inside that!

scaghead
Top Gear
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:52 pm
Location: essex

Post by scaghead » Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:46 pm

Who bought APM's car?? I wanna see inside that! would be interesting. APM you obviously did not notice any loss of bhp and had you had it on a RR at all in say the last 20k ?

Marcus-RS4
4th Gear
Posts: 597
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:57 pm

Post by Marcus-RS4 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:57 pm

yup, I was there, it did make the lowest bhp, but then again it was running 95 so wasnt a fair comparison!

rAudiguy
5th Gear
Posts: 1363
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:05 pm
Location: Berkshire

Post by rAudiguy » Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:32 pm

Don't for get that APM's car was JonP's and he did massive motor way miles in it everyday which could make a difference??? Still be interested to see what it's like. Black and gunky I would say!!! Mine has done 12k and I will soon be opening it up! but I know for sure if Caldy's car with 3500 miles on it looked not far off Pippyrips then mine will be just as bad!! :cry:

It will be very interesting to see what difference there is between cars on the 18th

Jim
Current car..... hmmmmm????
RS4 B7 Gone
RS6 C5 Gone
M3 E46 smg Gone
S3 Gone

P_G
Cruising
Posts: 8249
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Post by P_G » Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:51 pm

I have a 45K mile car, likely to be 46K by the time I get to the meet but to be honest I'll wait to see the r/r results first before even considering opening up the engine to see what the appreciable difference is between what my car is producing and what some of those that have been 'cleansed' are.

SR71
5th Gear
Posts: 1376
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:58 am

Post by SR71 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:50 pm

Here is a good, but involved, link on the function of the flaps and vanes in a DI engine:

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/605314 ... temming=on

I'll be writing to Audi to see what they suggest I do to my engine in light of the above.
58 C6 RS6 Stage 2+
58 C6 A6 Allroad 2.7 TDi

Previous:

2000 B5 S4 MRC 550 Saloon
2007 B7 RS4 Saloon
1994 S2 Coupe

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

Post by neckarsulm » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:07 pm

I know of a 40k mile 2.0 FSI Golf that had to have an EGR valve due to sludging up like this.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

SR71
5th Gear
Posts: 1376
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:58 am

Post by SR71 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:12 pm

I'm taking the EGR and inlet manifold off my 80K 2.0 TDi next week and we'll see what that looks like...
58 C6 RS6 Stage 2+
58 C6 A6 Allroad 2.7 TDi

Previous:

2000 B5 S4 MRC 550 Saloon
2007 B7 RS4 Saloon
1994 S2 Coupe

P_G
Cruising
Posts: 8249
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Post by P_G » Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:39 am

neckarsulm wrote:I know of a 40k mile 2.0 FSI Golf that had to have an EGR valve due to sludging up like this.
1 in how many 2.0 FSI golfs produced? Not trying to belittle what you have said; just there are a myriad of factors that could cause 'sludging up' from the type of fuel used to the way it is driven to the parts put in the engine. And as yet there are no tangible results to say that what is going on in FSI engines is significantly detrimental to performance beyond the placebo effect?

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 113 guests