Request for gents with a data logger:

Post by **ArthurPE** » Mon May 10, 2010 3:12 pm

I'm not denying you are incorrect and your posts contain no information
be happy, don't be sad...

[/quote]

Sims wrote:
ArthurPE wrote:yes, I agree, your content is BS, was then, is now

You are in denial on everything. That is sad.

Post by **philipwalker** » Mon May 10, 2010 3:50 pm

Get the hint mate....

Post by **P_G** » Mon May 10, 2010 4:18 pm

Hint about what?

The data logger thread appears to have descended again where is was fine just before because of people misquoting. I was one of the people being misquoted.

Post by **ArthurPE** » Mon May 10, 2010 4:28 pm

sims, I'm serious, if you ran the test with a passenger/stopwatch and not hitting the throttle until 3000, try it again
start at 2000, gradually apply throttle until 100% ~2500
use the OBC
bare in mind: temp/fuel load/an avant weighs a bit more

don't even post the results, I don't care, do it for your own edification...

Post by **Sims** » Mon May 10, 2010 4:41 pm

P_G wrote: .... I was one of the people being misquoted.

Have I misquoted you?

Post by **ArthurPE** » Mon May 10, 2010 4:48 pm

Sims wrote: Have I misquoted you?

imo yes, and it was misrepresented out of context...

no, I won't 'prove' it, or 'show' you, that's been done, and is up to the reader to research and come to a conclusion if he so desires...which honestly, he probably doesn't, this is getting boring, personal and tiresome and so far off topic it's pathetic...

Post by **Sims** » Mon May 10, 2010 4:52 pm

P_G wrote:... it's an inaccurate measurement of car power output and only good as a baseline and comparsion for modifications on a car by car basis.

This quote?

Post by **Sims** » Mon May 10, 2010 4:53 pm

Sims wrote:
Come fella, you can do better than that Let's really home in on this data so we can all decide whether it's worth partaking in, or that it has no universal value (perhaps, a big perhaps, limited value on an individual basis as P-G suggested).

& this one

Post by **ArthurPE** » Mon May 10, 2010 4:56 pm

Sims wrote:
This quote?

isn't he talking about dynos? not the test

Post by **Sims** » Mon May 10, 2010 4:59 pm

ArthurPE wrote:
isn't he talking about dynos? not the test

It would help if he can state what it is.

Post by **ArthurPE** » Mon May 10, 2010 4:59 pm

Sims wrote:
Sims wrote:
Come fella, you can do better than that Let's really home in on this data so we can all decide whether it's worth partaking in, or that it has no universal value (perhaps, a big perhaps, limited value on an individual basis as P-G suggested).
& this one

he never said that in reference to the test, maybe not even in ref to the dyno?

Post by **ArthurPE** » Mon May 10, 2010 5:01 pm

Sims wrote:
ArthurPE wrote:
isn't he talking about dynos? not the test

It would help if he can state what it is.

he already has...

Post by **ArthurPE** » Mon May 10, 2010 5:05 pm

sims? sims? is there any one in there?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNfQS9fLO5M

Post by **ArthurPE** » Mon May 10, 2010 5:05 pm

sims? sims? is there any one in there?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNfQS9fLO5M

Post by **Sims** » Mon May 10, 2010 5:22 pm

ArthurPE wrote: I must be crazy for trying to participate in this self-serving, self-pity, negativism...
I get paid >$125/hr by clients paying a lot more for my consult...I should be more selective with my time... got a 2+ year back log, actually wrote microprocessor based code (same processor as the RS4 ECU utilizes), was told I was one of the best, on any machine...the code is easy, grasp of process optimization, not so...

RS246.com Forum :: The World's #1 Audi R, S and RS Enthusiast Community

Request for gents with a data logger:

Who is online