RS4 Issues - Anyone got a view?

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
User avatar
silverRS4
2nd Gear
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:59 pm
Location: S mode, USA

Post by silverRS4 » Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:54 pm

SR71 wrote: 2) Disconnect the CCV line back to the manifold - I doubt Audi will do that.
Wish it was that simple. You'd also then have to disconnect where the crankcase is drawing "in" air that's already passed through the mass air sensor. Then the crank case is free to ventilate is a fashion that's completely separate from the intake. However, the crankcase will then start to see positive pressure, relative to atmosphere, since the vacuum from the intake is now gone. This can affect gaskets (valve cover, oil pan, etc) in a bad way. In other words, this route can create more problems than it solves and the old saying "don't try this at home unless you know what you are doing" does apply..

Housemaster
1st Gear
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2007 1:40 pm

Post by Housemaster » Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:11 am

neckarsulm wrote:
have done several resets and a couple of engine management updates including a new 'lastest' update today I am told...
I wouldn't put it past Audi to tone down the sensitivity of the diagnostics to prevent the EML coming on (e.g. by increasing the operating parameters of what ever is to blame so it has greater tolerance) rather than actually fix the problem
I was already told that Audi might suggest this by my dealer. I told them to think again.

Housemaster
1st Gear
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2007 1:40 pm

Post by Housemaster » Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:12 am

pippyrips wrote:
Housemaster wrote:They have done several resets and a couple of engine management updates including a new 'lastest' update today I am told...
Other than installing new software and a new manifold, what else have they replaced?
I will dig out the details, but last time it was in it was 2 rear back boxes and an induction flap (sorry, don't have/know the exact element).

SR71
5th Gear
Posts: 1376
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:58 am

Post by SR71 » Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:37 pm

Silver,
Wish it was that simple. You'd also then have to disconnect where the crankcase is drawing "in" air that's already passed through the mass air sensor. Then the crank case is free to ventilate is a fashion that's completely separate from the intake. However, the crankcase will then start to see positive pressure, relative to atmosphere, since the vacuum from the intake is now gone.
I've been thinking about this. AntoRS4 measured a positive pressure delta over ambient in the inlet at WOT (see http://www.rs246.com/index.php?name=PNp ... e&start=15) so is it really a problem? i.e., there must be cases even in the stock configuration where the crankcase sees positive pressure anyway?

I freely admit I'm finding it hard to understand the relative pressures in the various components of CCV system especially as it looks like (on the basis there is a NRV in the line) they need to prevent reversal of the flow in some cases...

In principle I agree that "isolating" the system from the inlet is desirable.
58 C6 RS6 Stage 2+
58 C6 A6 Allroad 2.7 TDi

Previous:

2000 B5 S4 MRC 550 Saloon
2007 B7 RS4 Saloon
1994 S2 Coupe

RS04COM
1st Gear
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:36 pm

Post by RS04COM » Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:13 pm

Whatever the reasons are, I've had enough of driving around in a diesel-like petrol. I sent an email to Audi UK this morning at 09:49 and received a call at 09:55 from Audi UK Customer Services. Someone is going to call me tomorrow, ill update you guys with whatever happens.

rsowneraudi
Neutral
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:02 pm

Post by rsowneraudi » Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:49 pm

if the fault codes being posted are for 'low flow secondary air' then there is a chance it could be the intake manifold causing this issue if it is coked up with oil

User avatar
reevesroadster
3rd Gear
Posts: 382
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 1:02 am
Location: UK

Post by reevesroadster » Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:17 pm

FWIW, when the audi tech came out to me last week he identified a low flow secondary air, but confirmed the pump was still working. (You can check this by listening for a hoover type sound near the bulkhead when the ignition is on but the engine is not running).
The tech cleared the fault by resetting via the Audi diagnostics which involved some test where the car is allowed to idle for some time and the cats get really hot (600C+, and much hotter than they can get when driven normally). Ive checked for fault codes with VAG-COM since, and the fault has not reappered.
Sorry I dont have further techy info on the reset, I'll be happy to discuss with the dealer if required as the car is going in next week for the DRC.
Everyone is unique, just like you and me.

rs4jonesey
Neutral
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:50 pm

Post by rs4jonesey » Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:31 pm

hi guys myn is now playing up again.... wy did i buy this car. my fault codes are p2415 and the o2 sensor are reading fine on bank one sensor 1 and are reading on tick over lamba 1.007 but on lamba bank one sensor 2 it is reading 1.999 lean as hell.... also a nother fault code of p2679... unown what this one is? can anyone help???

AND WARRANTY RUNS OUT IN 2 DAYS great funnnnn!!!

User avatar
Contigo
Top Gear
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:32 pm

Post by Contigo » Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:00 am

Get the car in to dealers before the warranty runs out as it will still be classed as in warranty when the fault occured. Good luck!

I must admit, the pleasure of owning an Audi is really starting to niggle what with this problem, the cams and DRC issues on the other RS models :(
2001 Avus Silver RS4 B5 60k on clock, MRC Custom Remap, Sunroof, Bluetooth prep

2006 Daytona Grey RS4 B7, RNS-E - SOLD

2006 BMW M6 - GONE

simonhill
1st Gear
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 5:47 pm

Post by simonhill » Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:05 am

The problem of coking valves is beginnng to seriously worry me now - are all the FSI engines "timebombs" waiting to go wrong as the mileage creeps up?

User avatar
sonny
Cruising
Posts: 10278
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Kent

Post by sonny » Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:18 am

reevesroadster wrote:FWIW, when the audi tech came out to me last week he identified a low flow secondary air, but confirmed the pump was still working. (You can check this by listening for a hoover type sound near the bulkhead when the ignition is on but the engine is not running).
The tech cleared the fault by resetting via the Audi diagnostics which involved some test where the car is allowed to idle for some time and the cats get really hot (600C+, and much hotter than they can get when driven normally). Ive checked for fault codes with VAG-COM since, and the fault has not reappered.
Sorry I dont have further techy info on the reset, I'll be happy to discuss with the dealer if required as the car is going in next week for the DRC.
Extend your warranty, obviously don't tell Audi nothing is wrong. I hear what you are saying, the problems with these cars is starting to put me off a little now!
Money can't buy you love, but it can buy you a well sorted racecar

User avatar
PetrolDave
Cruising
Posts: 7599
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:28 am
Location: Southampton, Hampshire UK

Post by PetrolDave » Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:55 am

simonhill wrote:The problem of coking valves is beginnng to seriously worry me now - are all the FSI engines "timebombs" waiting to go wrong as the mileage creeps up?
IMHO it's not just a problem that will affect VAG FSI engines but will affect ALL direct injection engines from every manufacturer. The lack of fuel vapour in the inlet means that there is nothing to "wash off" deposits on the valves.

P_G
Cruising
Posts: 8249
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Post by P_G » Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:03 pm

The question still remains though, how many cars has that particular problem affected to the point that the car developed a serious issue resulting in it not working and needing garage repair?

I haven't read the other forums regarding the 2.0 FSI engines however from what people have said it sounds like a handful? If that? Against how many FSI engines made?

User avatar
UNI555
2nd Gear
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:18 pm
Location: Somerset

Post by UNI555 » Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:19 pm

Before I bought an RS4 (recently) I read every road test I could find, as you do, and I read somehwere (think in an online Evo magazine test, where they ran one as a long-term car) that Audi designed the 4.2 FSI to do 155,000 miles without major work. Surely they would have bench tested, if not road tested the engine to high mileages before selling it? I mean, this is Audi, not TVR...or am I being naive?

P_G
Cruising
Posts: 8249
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Post by P_G » Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:47 pm

Exactly, and how many people do over 155,000 miles in their cars nowadays, particularly in a performance model. APM's car is the highest mileage so far and most of that was JonP. Even at the mileage I do it is going to be another 6-7 years before I get anywhere near that mileage and if I still have my RS4 then it won't be my primary runner by then.

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 191 guests