Page 1 of 2
whats the score with bhp.
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:46 am
by COT51E
this is taken from the stickey at the top of page.
why the difference in bhp. is it the difference from early models to late or 4 door to avant.
please tell.
Bhp @ rpm: 254/265 @ 5800
RE: whats the score with bhp.
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 6:56 am
by MarkB
US vs UK
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 3:30 pm
by s4-99
254 are the US BHP Figures and 265 are the UK BHP Figures. I dont know why they have less, but i'm sure us Brits aren't complaining

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 3:50 pm
by CliveH
Must be something to do with whatever has to be done to comply with their more stringent emissions regulations?
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 5:39 pm
by shineydave
or more likely to save 'em from tying it in knots at the first corner, lol
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:32 pm
by COT51E
cheers, thats cleared that up for me!
stringent emissions, the yanks ha ha! can't see a 5.7 v8 being emission friendly but then were talking a european car so of course they will have to be tight on imports!!!!!
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 8:03 pm
by KayGee
5.7 v8 producing 195 Bhp can be friendly
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 8:19 pm
by NeilMc
The US 5.7 V8's usually produce 275bhp and up (275 for the LT1 camaro, 345 for the LS1 corvette, 405 for the later C5 corvette Z06 and a few inbetween) depending on the application. It's really only California that has crazy emissions tests, so usually the yanks make a different exhaust system for vehicles sold in CA, but Audi just made the one for the whole of the US that would meet all standards.
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 9:52 pm
by CliveH
So that's what reduces the bhp on the US S4 then, Neil? A stiffling exhaust?
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:09 pm
by NeilMc
Hmmm, thinking about it that's probably not the reason for the difference in power, the exhaust may have been meeting standards as it was. I imagine the actual difference in power was due to it being tuned to run on a slightly lower octane fuel, which is all you can legally sell in California (again, due to their ridiculous emissions regulations).
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:24 pm
by CliveH
NeilMc wrote: due to it being tuned to run on a slightly lower octane fuel
hmmm...mine was tuned like that...but that's another story...!

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:28 pm
by harry
it states on said sticky that the us version s4 was detuned. Does that not account for the difference?
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:34 pm
by CliveH
harry wrote:it states on said sticky that the us version s4 was detuned. Does that not account for the difference?
Far too obvious - it's a known fact that most of us never read the instructions...or at least not until we start to get into problems...
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:35 pm
by harry
lol its usually the instructions that get me into trouble TBH
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 12:35 am
by KayGee
Cadilac produced a 5.7 V8 with 100K service intervals and 185bhp. Supposed to be more environmentally friendly due to less use of oil and other chemicals used in maintaining cars. However I thought using old oil was bad news environmentally speaking, due to the breakdown of the chemicals....but what do I know.