Jezzer wrote:pippyrips wrote:here we go again
nice work
How many members are we going to lose on this one. I say ... three.
None I would hope, and no Alex that won't happen

Just moved here as it's more appropriate.
I think we can safely say that the previous thread was a combination of two guys with a 'little' history, and a really grey area when it comes to protecting the trade status contributors. I don't think the registered users are seeing any contunuity or indeed consistency in recent actions by the Crew, and that's wrong and on our part needs to be sorted before any other users or Crew end up on their arses again.
Here's the crack - no spin (honest). It's been a grey area for some time as to what is constituted as advertising and how best it is dealt with considering we do have guys paying for the privelege. Suffice to say that the previous thread, rightly or wrongly, was treated as a threat to the trade status, no doubt fuelled by the two personalities involved.
My friend and co Crew, Simon, is a businessman, and a very successful one at that. As any of you who run a business know, it's not easy, and sometimes you have to go with your instinct. Taking the situation between S4TAN and Simon out of it, I think it was the wrong call. But hey, wrong calls are made all the time, let's get over it
In fact I made few wrong decisions when I was Admin on here back in '04, indeed even chucked my toys out big style at one point. We learn from it.
Nevertheless, it shouldn't IMHO have happened
After much discussion in our 'back office' so to speak, we have stepped back a bit to take a more realistic view on how to run a fun/informative site, but still maintain a business head when it comes to generating revenue to contribute to running costs.
My personal view is that any thread that refers to works that have been done are fine, even with links (obviously unless we know something dodgy that you guys don't, in which case we the Crew should be slightly more informative in our approach) - I mean you can't show how your car has being fantastically detailed (or whatever) without posting who did it can you? And if you did, the next poster would ask who did it anyhow. But when the poster is the guy doing the work, making money from those works, but not registered with Trade Status, then that's when we would need to have a polite word (ok well maybe not so polite from Simon

I probs wouldn't be too polite myself come to think of it).
I don't think it was right that S4TAN felt he had to leave, but that was his choice. I for one hope he comes back, and you'll have my name on the petition as soon as I've finished this. It would be good to have him as a sparring partner on here

Mind you if he fecks with me he'll end up with an arse the size of a clown's pocket
Hope we can use this as a way forward for all of us, coz ultimately we all want the same thing ie. RS246 to be a cool site to use.
Cheers,
Andiroo.