Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

4.2 V8 40v biturbo - 450 bhp
4.2 V8 40v biturbo - 480 bhp (plus)
User avatar
feelou
2nd Gear
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Auckland
Contact:

Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by feelou » Wed Nov 01, 2006 12:55 am

German magazine 'Auto Motor und Sport' unveiled the new RS6 - a turbo version of the 5.2l V10 with 550hp. The looks aren't there yet, but the specs look good.

Details here

User avatar
saf
5th Gear
Posts: 1334
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:39 pm

RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by saf » Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:43 am

Its in german

Anyone translate?

User avatar
Brooner
Cruising
Posts: 3978
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 5:12 am
Location: Scotlandshire

RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by Brooner » Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:22 am

Rough translation


R-S - under this contraction the Top models of the AUDI series - car engine and sport.de firmieren went up-to-date the AUDI RS6 and the AUDI TT R-S with up to 550 HP and turbo-loading into the net.
The hot version of the new AUDI TT is to be beaconed by one approximately 350 HP strong row five-cylinder with 2,5 litres capacity. Supporting a Bi-turbo intervenes. Thus the Ingolstaedter aims to coming Porsche Cayman among other things at the 2008 at the market. For the forwarding of the achievement on all four permanently propelled wheels provides six-course transmission, which with surcharge by a DSG can be replaced. The TT R-S at a more aggressive front apron is optical to recognize R-S Logos by the tail and on the brake calipers as well as special light alloy wheels and outside mirrors in carbon Look. Rather for the "family business" AUDI offers the RS6, which will celebrate its debut on that Geneva cars salon 2007. Propelled of 5,2 litres the large V10 from the S6, but with turbo-support are to bring RS6-Limousine and combination up to 550 HP on the road. Larger air intakes mark arranged exhaust final pipes the Top versions also here in the front as well as other.
2018 B9 RS4 Navarra Blue
2013 B8 RS4 Sepang Blue
2007 B7 RS4 Avant Sprint Blue
2001 B5 RS4 Nogaro Blue
1998 B5 S4 Avant Kingfisher Blue
1993 B4 S2 Avant laser Red

User avatar
Rupert
5th Gear
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:57 pm

RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by Rupert » Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:40 am

Liking it much very I am. :D

peterb
4th Gear
Posts: 847
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 11:13 pm
Location: Davao, Philippines

Re: RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by peterb » Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:43 am

Brooner wrote:Rough translation ....
Which just goes to show how cr*p the automatic translators are!
07 Mitsubishi Pajero(Shogun) 3.2 Di-D
Suzuki Carry 660

User avatar
AntS4
1st Gear
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 1:38 pm

RE: Re: RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by AntS4 » Wed Nov 01, 2006 12:30 pm

Rupert, turned into Yoda, you have!
Was: 2003(03) S4 Avant - Moro Blue
Was: 2004(54) RS6 Avant - Daytona Grey
Was: 2005(55) 911 Carrera S - Arctic Silver
Now: 2008 (08) A5 3.0Tdi Q Sport - Phantom Black

User avatar
Brooner
Cruising
Posts: 3978
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 5:12 am
Location: Scotlandshire

RE: Re: RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by Brooner » Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:01 pm

Brooner wrote:
Rough translation ....

Which just goes to show how cr*p the automatic translators are!
well pardon me for giving a <beep>!!!!!!!
2018 B9 RS4 Navarra Blue
2013 B8 RS4 Sepang Blue
2007 B7 RS4 Avant Sprint Blue
2001 B5 RS4 Nogaro Blue
1998 B5 S4 Avant Kingfisher Blue
1993 B4 S2 Avant laser Red

User avatar
SteveH
Top Gear
Posts: 2359
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: making rapid progress

RE: Re: RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by SteveH » Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:55 pm

Easy tigers! no falling out needed.

Strangely, I will be dissapointed if they go for a 550bhp 5.2L TT'd engine. When you think about it, more and more manufacturers are kicking out engines that are just over the 100bhp per litre capacity. Audi have historically done well squeezing performance out of engines, but 550bhp from a 5.2L block is surely run of the mill nowadays. I would be far more impressed if they only marginally increased the beans to say 500bhp with an equally adequate and impressive torque figure, (which is a shed load of grunt to put a smile on your face everyday) but delivered this from a more efficient block, perhaps a 4.0L V10 that can rev for England!?

Also I wonder if there will be any gearbox options this time? They have more boxes available to them that can take the grunt.

Well done Audi, I would give a score of 4 out of 10 so far, must try harder...
Present:...
Lotus Evora GT410 Sport, Caterham 420R, CCM Spitfire, VW T2 Bay Window 1976

Past:
DB11 AMR, 992, 991.2, Yamaha MT01, 640d Gran Coupe, 635d Coupe, RS6 C5, Audi TT 225 Coupe, Astra with wind up windows, Citroen ZX, Rover 213, yes behold, a Rover 213... Renault 5

User avatar
Rupert
5th Gear
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:57 pm

Re: RE: Re: RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by Rupert » Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:45 am

SteveH wrote: I would be far more impressed if they only marginally increased the beans to say 500bhp with an equally adequate and impressive torque figure, (which is a shed load of grunt to put a smile on your face everyday) but delivered this from a more efficient block, perhaps a 4.0L V10 that can rev for England!?

Also I wonder if there will be any gearbox options this time? They have more boxes available to them that can take the grunt.
The problem is that torque and BHP are related, so it is unusual to have both high-revs and high torque. Anyone know of any high-torque screamers? Whatever the gearbox, I'd like to hear an announcement about its maximum allowable torque figure (for tuning purposes :) ), there's no excuse for the gearbox to be the weak link anymore.

User avatar
Wolverine
3rd Gear
Posts: 467
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:34 pm

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by Wolverine » Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:12 pm

To be honest, the new RS6 isnt likely to be much lighter than the current model. With a noramlly aspirated engine you just wouldnt have enough torque at the bottom end to get thinsg moving .... so Turbo probably seems a good idea. Also, turbo cars are much more tunable .... 550bhp could quite easily be turned to 620 maybe. Also 4l V10 probably not enough, would need to go down the Merc route and plump for a 6.3l V8 mega monster if going normally aspirated route.

The looks so far really dont do it for me though ...... not for a car that is £70k+.

User avatar
SteveH
Top Gear
Posts: 2359
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: making rapid progress

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by SteveH » Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:27 pm

:oops: Apologies, lost in translation.... I meant turbocharged, but failed to type the point.
Present:...
Lotus Evora GT410 Sport, Caterham 420R, CCM Spitfire, VW T2 Bay Window 1976

Past:
DB11 AMR, 992, 991.2, Yamaha MT01, 640d Gran Coupe, 635d Coupe, RS6 C5, Audi TT 225 Coupe, Astra with wind up windows, Citroen ZX, Rover 213, yes behold, a Rover 213... Renault 5

Future_RS6Owner
2nd Gear
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 2:59 pm

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by Future_RS6Owner » Thu Nov 02, 2006 4:18 pm

Well its rumoured that Audi has been testing this new engine at 650bhp+ maybe even 700bhp. I guess they are testing to see how much the engine can take after people start to chip and tune the car. If this is so then bloody hell! :bash: :notworthy:

peterb
4th Gear
Posts: 847
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 11:13 pm
Location: Davao, Philippines

Re: RE: Re: RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by peterb » Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:42 pm

Brooner wrote:
Brooner wrote:
Rough translation ....

Which just goes to show how cr*p the automatic translators are!
well pardon me for giving a <beep>!!!!!!!
Hey. sorry. That wasn't meant to be a dig at you! :beerchug:

You did use an automated translator, didn't you? :oops:
07 Mitsubishi Pajero(Shogun) 3.2 Di-D
Suzuki Carry 660

User avatar
saf
5th Gear
Posts: 1334
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:39 pm

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by saf » Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:19 pm

Danke schön for the translation brooner.

I think the 5.2 V10 will be very tuneable.

Although I think the new S6 is slow for what it is, It has got very good low down torque because of the 5.2 V10. This coulped with twin turbos should be a very good combination.

I think out of that engine, Which already flows quite a bit anyhow, if they manage to make decent manifold we should be seeing over 600 and close to 620 hp on a remap and maybe more depending what turbo specification they will use. Hopefully they will concentrate on taking out as much lag as possible. As it will be competition for the M5, I can see it having a good 0-60, possibly around 4.2 to 4.5 seconds. And after 60 is when it will take off properly. This is obviously guessing what they will do compared to the what theyve done before.

They might just scrap things alltogether and just shuv a 6.0 v12 in there. If which they do, I will be utterly dissapointed. just as I was dissapointed with the RS4.

I do hope they bring it out with a manual gear box. would be nice for a change. Its not a luxury car. Its supposed to be a drivers car. If someone wants an auto bos, then thats what the A8 range is for.

User avatar
bogie
3rd Gear
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:07 am
Location: Essex
Contact:

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Turbocharged 5.2 V10 anyone?

Post by bogie » Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:41 am

600bhp with a remap would be fine...with a <beep> load of torque of course...new S6 is heavier than current RS6 anyway....so the new RS6 probably as heavy still :(

...nice family wagon....but I wont be buying one until they are least 2 years old ;)
cheers
bogie
----------------------------------------------
1998 S4 2.7 (MRC stage 1) gone
2003 RS6 Avant (ebony black, AMD remap) - sadly gone

Post Reply

Return to “RS6 / RS6 plus (C5 Typ 4B) 2002-2004”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: allroadadi, steve2003rs6 and 82 guests