DRC action against audi, please contribute!

4.2 V8 40v biturbo - 450 bhp
4.2 V8 40v biturbo - 480 bhp (plus)
deanobeano
3rd Gear
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:12 pm

Post by deanobeano » Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:19 pm

Well Said Rilla!
08 Prius (saving money)
RS6+ (spending money)

User avatar
Rupert
5th Gear
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:57 pm

Post by Rupert » Fri Apr 10, 2009 6:13 pm

Rilla wrote:I will be taking advantage of this 'new & improved' fix though, 10 mins before I go to grizz and have coilovers fitted. Just to cost Audi something basically.
I've had exactly the same thought! I have parts warranty, extended warranty, and now this new offer available to me... I could have my two leaking shocks replaced at a cost of £1500 to Audi, the Audi garage won't care as it's income for them... Then rip it all off the next day while I fork out £1500 myself for proper suspension. Then send Richard Starkey a central valve suppository. :D

User avatar
GardinerG
Top Gear
Posts: 2285
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:58 pm
Location: Fleet, Hampshire

Post by GardinerG » Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:00 pm

I would be tempted to order in a new shock to strip it down and compare it to an old one to see if this "fix" does anything worthwhile.

I'm surprised that their press release doesn't have a get out clause for drivers who actually drive the RS6 as it was designed to be driven (as advertised by the Renn Sport tag)!

User avatar
MalcolmSu
4th Gear
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:26 pm
Location: Falkirk, Scotland
Contact:

Post by MalcolmSu » Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:50 pm

Reading the threads over on rs6.com and audiworld.com I think i've concluded that all Audi UK are offering is the current shock absorber parts but with the protective boot which as some have already experienced does nothing to prevent further failures. Comparing the part numbers quoted by those in the US forums who've already had their 'recall' repair they compare exactly with the replacements I had on my car in Dec last year and again in Feb this year. :evil: :evil:

It's sickening also to read there of those owners that have already been reimbursed in cash for previous repairs by AoA.

Rilla
3rd Gear
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:56 pm

Post by Rilla » Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:19 pm

I will be phoning Audi of America first thing tuesday as I have been looking on on rs6.com and audiworld.com and see that AoA have started to replace peoples DRC already.
I will try to find out exactly what parts they are changing, and get 100% confirmation of part numbers. Once i have this info I will be contacting Richard Starkey AGAIN to find out how their fix differs to the one offered to UK owners.
And yes Malcolm, double sickener that American owners are getting refunded expenses. Maybe Audi UK should give every owner a tube of vaseline to aid the insertion of the big <beep> they seem to enjoy f**king us with over the DRC system.
I had to stop reading the american forums, it was making me sick/angry/pissed off to hear them saying they have got their cars repaired and got refunded money.

THIS IS NOT ON AUDI!!!!

I will let you know the outcome of my conversation with Richard Starkey. Though dont hold your breaths for anything useful.

marmite
4th Gear
Posts: 740
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:02 am
Location: Barnet

Post by marmite » Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:22 am

All very dissapointing

I got told and confimred in the letter sent by CS that the shocks have been modified and I believe BAZZA was told the same thing by Audi.......all crap

Where next? to elite and specialised for WD...rubbish...I suppose if we drove £3000 cars this what not be an issue...really gets me made when you hear things like this...inc RS4 there is over 100 people with a serious issue a safety related issue!! but if they can't help they can't help

Audi are laughing behind there red tape and Press releases...waste of effort I would feel much better if they just said "there is not any issue with DRC but we don't give a F##K if there is or we think there is, even if there is we wouldn't tell anyone we sell cars and parts so you handfull of pissed off Rs6 and RS4 owners don't really matter to us so go and pester someone else"


What about forwarding this all over to AG? and putting formal complaints in about staff in CS?? wouldn't have thought this would make the slight of difference
03 RS6 Saloon Daytona Grey | Milltek | RS6+ Wheels | RS6 Mats | Tesco Club Card Points

User avatar
Ironside-69
1st Gear
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: North Lincolnshire

Post by Ironside-69 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:33 am

Hi everyone

I don't know what response I will get from Richard Starkey following my request last Thursday morning for a replacement of a failed system currently and a credit note or recompense for a shock and valve replaced last summer. I will let you know.

I do have a barrister friend who may be willing to advise on a way forward legally. I don't know how we would go about sorting out contributions to the cost, but from what I've read if I was him I would be rubbing my hands together. How can this not be an open and shut case? The suspension as fitted is clearly not fit for purpose, the "fix" seems to be marginally better, and the admission in the US would make me nervous if the responsibility for this mess rested with me.

This is one of two or three flagship models in the Audi range and is a monster of a vehicle. Mine feels like a boat at the moment, tacking round bends and having little or no enjoyment from the whole driving experience. The ride is unbelievably noisy and uncomfortable. The rear suspension has begun to creak and moan at slow speeds, has anyone else experienced anything similar?

What's the feeling, do you want me to contact my man and ask him to have a look?

Martin

bazza
2nd Gear
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 3:39 pm
Location: Herts

Post by bazza » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:54 am

I would be willing to contribute to the fund........as long as it doesn’t get in to silly money which i don’t think it will.

AOA have really shafted AUDI UK with that recall letter so i think they will have no choice but to offer the same as the US if it went down the leagal route

This is now one of the most view threads on the RS6 board so its getting the attention it deserves...we just need to take it to the next level......Maybe some one should pay Mr Starky a personal visit as his getting a name for being a bit of an A Hole............

Baz
Past: Noggy 2000 B5 S4
Azure Blue 2000 Oettinger B5 S4
Mugello RS6 *STOLEN* RN52 UXB
Avus Oettinger A3 2.0T
Misano Oettinger C5 RS6
Phantom Oettinger C6 A6 Sline Avant
Present: RS7 Panther Black
Porsche Cayenne
C7 Avus silver avant 2.0 tdi ultra

User avatar
RichRS6
3rd Gear
Posts: 437
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:49 am
Location: Penzance

Post by RichRS6 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:42 am

Hi Ironside,

Find out how much Your Legal Eagle will charge us to write a formal letter of intent to Audi of our intention to pursue this matter through the courts if we cannot get satisfaction form them.

I would want Audi U.K. to offer us exactly the same package that AOA are for the U.S. owners

I'm willing to put some money towards this fund and if we can get a price for writing one letter then we can get up a fighting fund.
03 Mugello Blue Avant, Silver Leather, Carbon Fibre, Alcantara Headlining, MFSW, Electric folding Mirrors. H&R Coilovers, Hotchkis ARB's, Res Miltek, APR R1's, ITG Filters, RNS-E, OEM Bluetooth, Digital Freeview and Headrest Monitors, Aero Wipers, Rear Aero Wiper and R/H parking Mod, Rear Fog mod, Valentine 1.

Rilla
3rd Gear
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:56 pm

Post by Rilla » Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:46 am

Hi Fellas,
Ironside, go for it mate, see what we are looking at by way of costs, and defo ask about a letter as per Rich's comment. I cant see a letter costing the earth, and I would be happy to contribute towards costs if we can get enough people involved.

User avatar
Ironside-69
1st Gear
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: North Lincolnshire

Post by Ironside-69 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:58 am

Hi guys

We need to be clear what it is that we are asking Richard Starkey to offer us. His job is one of those where everyone assumes it is him that is being obstructive, I would imagine his hands are tied from way above his head, maybe a letter of intent is what will be needed to spur the big wigs into action and allow him to do his job and allow us all some of his customer service.

It is my feeling that the suspension system is fatally flawed and any and all historical costs that can be proven should be reimbursed. In addition I believe Audi should be giving us the choice of ongoing warranted repairs/replacements relating to the DRC components OR paying for the installation of an after-market solution. Once the latter is paid for you couldn't imagine it reasonable for Audi to continue to cover other suppliers parts.

I think we need to agree what it is that we want, in principle before setting up any legal action, does the above summary sound ok?

I will make contact with Andrew and let you all know what the costs might be.

Martin

Rilla
3rd Gear
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:56 pm

Post by Rilla » Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:28 pm

sounds perfect to me mate, that was what i was pushing for from day 1 tbh. Refunds of ANY costs incurred, whether it be replacing like for like of ripping out and fitting aftermarket.

User avatar
Daveperc
Cruising
Posts: 2596
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:48 am
Location: Sandhurst, Berks

Post by Daveperc » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:09 pm

Also needs to go back to the first models (?2002), not some arbitrary cut off date/mileage. If it was unsafe from ASpril 2003, then it was unsafe before, no matter how many miles you have driven

Dave

User avatar
MalcolmSu
4th Gear
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:26 pm
Location: Falkirk, Scotland
Contact:

Post by MalcolmSu » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:41 pm

Rilla wrote:After a lengthy discussion via email and phone with Sarah at Watchdog, they feel that this issues doesn't affect enough of the general public to be something they can investigate for us. Her words were: 'he RS6 was a fairly exclusive car to begin with, and it doesn't affect enough people for it to be something we would be looking to investigate.
I'm not a regular Watchdog viewer but tuned in tonight to see two or three articles that I can see did effect a significant number of viewers but also one article that affected a couple of celebrities and involved insignificant amounts of money! In fact one could argue that their publicity will have a negative impact! No one will use the promoter featured meaning the celebs stand less of chance of getting their back pay!

I struggle to see why this piece got air time and not our RS6s. :shock:

User avatar
Shoppinit
Cruising
Posts: 20285
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:24 pm

Post by Shoppinit » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:55 pm

MalcolmSu wrote:I struggle to see why this piece got air time and not our RS6s. :shock:
I had exactly the same thoughts. Must be the standard fob-off excuse.
Daytona RS6 C5 Avant. Viper'd, Billies, Waggers, MTM box brain, C6 stoppers, xcarlink, R8 coolant cap (woohoo)
///M3 E46 | XC90 (V8, natch) | Passat GTE | RR Classic V8 flapper
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair."

Post Reply

Return to “RS6 / RS6 plus (C5 Typ 4B) 2002-2004”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: asgor, bilko1, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 130 guests