When to replace MAFs?

4.2 V8 40v biturbo - 450 bhp
4.2 V8 40v biturbo - 480 bhp (plus)
User avatar
Shoppinit
Cruising
Posts: 20308
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:24 pm

Post by Shoppinit » Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:04 pm

I see what you mean about the 364.08 max value. That is just weird. I don't know why it would be limited, but 364.08 / 0.8 = 455 :shock:
Daytona RS6 C5 Avant. Viper'd, Billies, Waggers, MTM box brain, C6 stoppers, xcarlink, R8 coolant cap (woohoo)
///M3 E46 | XC90 (V8, natch) | Passat GTE | RR Classic V8 flapper
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair."

User avatar
Shoppinit
Cruising
Posts: 20308
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:24 pm

Post by Shoppinit » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:36 am

I'm just looking at some logs from a friend's S4 B5 and his lambda correction doesn't go to zero under WOT. Quite the opposite, it goes to full enrich... What could that mean?

On lift off, his lambda correction goes to zero.

Image
Attachments
LOG-01-001-002-115.xls
S4 B5 logs
(58 KiB) Downloaded 53 times
Daytona RS6 C5 Avant. Viper'd, Billies, Waggers, MTM box brain, C6 stoppers, xcarlink, R8 coolant cap (woohoo)
///M3 E46 | XC90 (V8, natch) | Passat GTE | RR Classic V8 flapper
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair."

paul_23
3rd Gear
Posts: 287
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:10 am
Location: Dubai

Post by paul_23 » Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:20 pm

I bit the bullet and have just had my MAFs replaced and the seals changed - I thought they were just o rings but the lower seal to the mafs is actually a mount so cost me about 25 quid each! It feels a bit swifter but will do some logs soon for a back to back comparison - old vs new!! I also had the vacuum hosing replaced while the air box was off.

RS6-4dr911
1st Gear
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:34 am
Location: Houston, TX, USA

Post by RS6-4dr911 » Tue Feb 02, 2010 7:32 pm

paul_23 wrote:I bit the bullet and have just had my MAFs replaced and the seals changed - I thought they were just o rings but the lower seal to the mafs is actually a mount so cost me about 25 quid each! It feels a bit swifter but will do some logs soon for a back to back comparison - old vs new!! I also had the vacuum hosing replaced while the air box was off.
Semi-ditto - mine goes in Thursday for new MAF's, new N75 and top seals only. Bottom are unlikely to be bad, we'll check when it's apart and deal with it then. I'll run some logs before and after as well.

I had looked back at some Lambda readings and they were well over 10% in certain spots, the Ross-Tech write up mentions that is beyond "normal" range, so that along with high variation between them, a low total reading, 48k miles and performance issues, seemed like a reasonable next move.

batty
3rd Gear
Posts: 460
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 6:48 am
Location: Lincolnshire

Post by batty » Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:47 pm

how much are the MAFs, by the way ??
c5 RS6 plus in silver

RS6-4dr911
1st Gear
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:34 am
Location: Houston, TX, USA

Post by RS6-4dr911 » Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:49 am

Over here they're about $225 each for new, $160 for reman.

Bottom seals for me were $60 ea, so a little more than 25 quid., I passed.

With shipping, I would guess everything's a bit less over there.

paul_23
3rd Gear
Posts: 287
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:10 am
Location: Dubai

Post by paul_23 » Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:50 am

I have done a few VAGCOM logs and noticed the first thing is that at idle the 2 new MAFs are pretty much the same (approx 3.5 each). Normal cruising they seem to fluctuate and dont always match - sometimes by quite a difference.

On full load (and I did some long pulls in 4th from 2000 to 5500 rpm) they both climb and are fairly well matched but are not identical - they are better than the old ones. I have not been logging blocks 1-2-3 so dont know lambda.

However, since the MAF change I have got fault codes:
2 Faults Found:

17536 - Fuel Trim: Bank 1 (Mult): System too Lean

P1128 - 001 - Upper Limit Exceeded

17538 - Fuel Trim: Bank 2 (Mult): System too Lean

P1130 - 001 - Upper Limit Exceeded

These appear even after clearing them and only after gentle driving. Not sure what has caused these but they were not there before MAF swapped out. I do note that it is not silky smooth on full throttle around 2500rpm but smooths out after 3000rpm so it may be holding back. I checked the idle stabilisation correction factors (block 20-21) and the values go up to max 7 (at 5000rpm) which I have been told is ok but should not go above this.

Of interest, the MafS were replaced at the AUdi dealer in Dubai and I showed them my print out of MAF values to show them the problem. The german chief foreman came out to review and agreed but when he handed the car back he said they can't log them like I did as their software isn't able! I told him it is VAGCOM worth a few hundred dollars and he looked amazed and asked for me to keep him advised how they perform because he likes my car! I will try to get in touch with him to ask about these new fault codes.

Paul

User avatar
Shoppinit
Cruising
Posts: 20308
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:24 pm

Post by Shoppinit » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:46 am

Sounds like unmetered air getting in. You sure those seals are installed properly? That error is from when the lambda values are out of spec and the car can't enrich the mixture enough to compensate.
Daytona RS6 C5 Avant. Viper'd, Billies, Waggers, MTM box brain, C6 stoppers, xcarlink, R8 coolant cap (woohoo)
///M3 E46 | XC90 (V8, natch) | Passat GTE | RR Classic V8 flapper
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair."

paul_23
3rd Gear
Posts: 287
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:10 am
Location: Dubai

Post by paul_23 » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:56 am

Checking the fault code explanations on Ross Tech it seems to indicate MAF problems, injectors or O2 sensors. As all were working fine before (or no faults) so the finger points to MAFs again or as you say, seals. I will fill with new fuel today and try it out again to see if it continues.

User avatar
Shoppinit
Cruising
Posts: 20308
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:24 pm

Post by Shoppinit » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:07 am

Hold on. Could be that the ECU needs to adjust the trim to new values to take into account the new MAFs. Not sure how to go about that. Perhaps disconnect the battery for a while?
Daytona RS6 C5 Avant. Viper'd, Billies, Waggers, MTM box brain, C6 stoppers, xcarlink, R8 coolant cap (woohoo)
///M3 E46 | XC90 (V8, natch) | Passat GTE | RR Classic V8 flapper
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair."

paul_23
3rd Gear
Posts: 287
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:10 am
Location: Dubai

Post by paul_23 » Thu Feb 04, 2010 7:30 am

I unplugged battery and after clearing the faults that appear when reconnected, I drove to work and no faults! Bingo I hope. Will post some output soon.

Thanks and a good benefit of forum input.

RS6-4dr911
1st Gear
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:34 am
Location: Houston, TX, USA

Before and after logs

Post by RS6-4dr911 » Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:16 am

Replaced MAF's, top seals and N75 today. Before and after logs seem to indicate the variation between banks has narrowed considerably. They are also indicating higher readings by about 5% (used the average of all runs before and after, taking the MAF divided by RPM while under full boost).

Butt dyno says a little snappier off the line. Waiting for dry weather to see what the impact on 0-60 times is.

Image

User avatar
Shoppinit
Cruising
Posts: 20308
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:24 pm

Post by Shoppinit » Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:11 am

Cool. WOuld be useful if you could post the 1, 2 & 3 groups for a direct comparison with previous value.

I've ordered 2 MAFs even though I'm sure mine are fine. For the sake of the experiment :)
Daytona RS6 C5 Avant. Viper'd, Billies, Waggers, MTM box brain, C6 stoppers, xcarlink, R8 coolant cap (woohoo)
///M3 E46 | XC90 (V8, natch) | Passat GTE | RR Classic V8 flapper
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair."

MoRS6+
5th Gear
Posts: 1102
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:30 pm

Post by MoRS6+ » Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:31 pm

I'm loving all this!

Hats off to you guys; this sort of material is what makes these forums such a fantastic resource and putting up simple charts with before and after comparisons for us mere mortals to understand without geeky and exhausting verbal explanations is frankly marvellous!

:thumbs:

User avatar
CliveH
Cruising
Posts: 4754
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2004 12:07 pm
Location: Yorkshire, UK

Post by CliveH » Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:28 pm

Agreed! :thumbs:
Clive

S2 ABY coupe, S4 B5 saloon, S4 B6 avant
RS4 B7 phantom black saloon, mint, fully loaded, low mileage - FOR SALE!- http://www.rs246.com/index.php?name=PNp ... ic&t=88981
S8 D2 facelift, RS6 C5 saloon, both gone but not forgotten

Post Reply

Return to “RS6 / RS6 plus (C5 Typ 4B) 2002-2004”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests