PS Damon, have you had your valet yet?

The differences are not significant. In Sport the car is very slightly more responsive, but you'd be hard pushed to notice. The manufacturers performance figures are all based on the car being in Drive only.bobjebb wrote:I had a read of this thread earlier
http://www.rs246.com/index.php?name=PNp ... ic&t=52412
and wondered howour cars would fair?
I've not had a real go with anyone apart from a spurt with a (BMW 330!) and was surprised how much welly I felt I had to employ to keep up, ie 6,000 rpm. Just remember thinking my RS4 would have embarrassed it in reverse. Having said that I'm sure I haven't found the best way to get most power out of the car at short notice - paddles? Sport mode? both? Is it me or can they be 'inconsistent' I've noticed Sport mode on some occasions really is different - other times it seems less dramatic.
As you might have gathered I'm new to Auto...
Responded to your Gearbox quoters666 wrote:W8 PMC and I have had a disagreement over this on the tt forum but I reckon using the paddles is more effective/quicker.
Valet is 19th March as long as the weather holds, can't wait Dave's work is fantastic http://www.jac-in-a-box.com/
Think that Evo quote this as circa 11 secondsbobjebb wrote:Anyone hazard a 0-100 time for a 6+? I'm always being asked!Cheers
I'd say it is the smoothness that's deceptive. Had mine timed a few times & i was getting 0-60 in 4.0sec & even got a reading of 3.9 once, but i'd always quote 4 to be safe. One odd timing i once got was from 50mph - 163mph (of course rolling) & that took 14 secs IIRC which i was very happy with. Top speed recorded on a RR was 204MPH.bobjebb wrote:Thanks Paul.
I find the manufaturers figures of 4.6 s to 60 a little hard to believe thats all, unless the smoothness compared to my B5 RS4 is deceptive....?
Anyone hazard a 0-100 time for a 6+? I'm always being asked!
Cheers
Users browsing this forum: audirew, Google Adsense [Bot] and 89 guests