Page 1 of 2
UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 1:54 pm
by robertmfreeman
Hi,
I have just purchased a UUC shortshifter for my S4.
Question is 20,30 or 40% reduction. Anyone got any opinions?
Cheers,
Robert [img]images/graemlins/s4anogaro.gif[/img]
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 2:07 pm
by jeffw
40%
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 2:08 pm
by PhilT
Send it back and get a Tanoga [img]images/graemlins/thumbs.gif[/img] .
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 2:59 pm
by keyser
Send it back and get a Tanoga [img]images/graemlins/thumbs.gif[/img] .
hahaha... good one...
Isn't Tanoga way much more expansive?
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 4:01 pm
by johneroberts
£150 ish plus fitting
UUC £350 plus fitting
So no it is not more expensive
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 4:19 pm
by keyser
UUC is (279$) 175pounds +shiping +fitting -
UUC SS
TANOGA is (328$) 215pounds +VAT +fitting
tanoga ss
at least buying from the producers.
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 4:57 pm
by Prawn
40% , VERY SLICK [img]images/graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 6:23 pm
by Bushy
i think Karl needs to adjust his prices
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 7:56 pm
by tanoga
i think Karl needs to adjust his prices
Why is that then Bushy
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:24 pm
by johneroberts
"said in a London East end accent"
Yeah whats the problem....
and what you looking at [img]images/graemlins/roflmao.gif[/img]
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:36 pm
by Bushy
cos geyser it appears slightly too high compaired to some of the UUC stuff
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 9:39 pm
by keyser
cos geyser it appears slightly too high compaired to some of the UUC stuff
why do you say so? [img]images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
why calling me geyser? I don't get it. I just gave you pure facts. You don't like it?
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 9:46 pm
by PhilT
cos geyser it appears slightly too high compaired to some of the UUC stuff
why do you say so? [img]images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
why calling me geyser? I don't get it. I just gave you pure facts. You don't like it?
Language barrier, no offence meant, I'm sure [img]images/graemlins/thumbs.gif[/img]
Bushy's message is directed to Tanoga, and a Geyser is slang for bloke!! [img]images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 9:52 pm
by Riz_RS4
oooooooo [img]images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] [img]images/graemlins/biggrin3.gif[/img]
Re: UUC Shortshifter reduction %
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 10:40 pm
by tanoga
cos geyser it appears slightly too high compaired to some of the UUC stuff
and a Rolls Royce costs more then a Mini [img]images/graemlins/033102bigblink_1_prv.gif[/img]