Optimax vs. Ultimate

Discuss common aspects of Audi RS and S tuning and modifications
Dippy
Cruising
Posts: 2710
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 4:05 pm
Location: West Berks, UK
Contact:

Re: Optimax vs. Ultimate

Post by Dippy » Wed Feb 04, 2004 1:59 pm

so Dippy,

you saying i will not suffer any problems, if i get the car remapped (AmD RR) while running millers ?
ie if i decide to stop using millers in the future?

Yes that's what I'm saying.

What I don't actually know is how far the ECU can actually advance the timing to take advantage of the octane level used. I know that the OEM setting will work with 98 RON because that's standard in Germany, but clearly there are limits to the range of octane that the ECU can cope with. Mitch from Revo explained that the Bosch ECU does indeed have a finite window, but that this can be set to start anywhere, and therefore a tuner can advance it. Although I don't know where AmD set their's too, I have no doubt that they are aware that their customers use Optimax with Millers, so I'm sure they set it to be able to advance to at least 100 RON.

Again, I don't fully know the details about APR & Revo's fuel-specific maps, but I can hazard a guess: Either it is because the window is so small that it can't cope with the entire range of fuels (but I really doubt this), or it is a more optimised map for the fuel: Advancing timing to near the knock point is only one aspect of ECU engine control. I am sure there are others. So by producing a selection of maps suitable for different fuels, you will always be optimised.

I myself am not really interested. I usually only use Optimax + Millers or another brand 97 RON + Millers. If I am forced to use 95 RON then I will simply expect lower performance until I can get back to the good stuff.
2001 Silver S4 Avant
AmD remap, APR R1 DVs, APR bipipe, Full Miltek exhaust
H&R coilovers, AWE DTS, Porsche front brakes, Short-shifter, 18" RS4 replicas
Defi-HUD boost gauge / turbo-timer (with afterrun pump modification), Phatbox

User avatar
Paul-RS
4th Gear
Posts: 664
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 1:31 am
Location: UK

Re: Optimax vs. Ultimate

Post by Paul-RS » Wed Feb 04, 2004 3:53 pm

cheers! [img]images/graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]

User avatar
s8n
3rd Gear
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 12:13 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Optimax vs. Ultimate

Post by s8n » Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:16 pm

Found some info on performanceforums.com..

Ultimate

50 ppm max Sulphar
1 % Max Benzene

Optimax

500 ppm max Sulphar
5 % Max Benzene


As you can see, alot more sulphar and benzene in optimax!
Audi S3

peterb
4th Gear
Posts: 847
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 11:13 pm
Location: Davao, Philippines

Re: Optimax vs. Ultimate

Post by peterb » Thu Feb 05, 2004 2:04 pm

As you can see, alot more sulphar and benzene in optimax!
... and is that good?

Probably good for performance, bad for polution?
07 Mitsubishi Pajero(Shogun) 3.2 Di-D
Suzuki Carry 660

User avatar
s8n
3rd Gear
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 12:13 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Optimax vs. Ultimate

Post by s8n » Thu Feb 05, 2004 3:12 pm

Well, its performance properties if any could be debateable.

However, benzene is extremly hazardous..

Here is a bit from http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/benzene/

Benzene is an aromatic hydrocarbon that is produced by the burning of natural products. It is a component of products derived from coal and petroleum and is found in gasoline and other fuels. Benzene is used in the manufacture of plastics, detergents, pesticides, and other chemicals. Research has shown benzene to be a carcinogen (cancer causing). With exposures from less than five years to more than 30 years, individuals have developed, and died from, leukemia. Long-term exposure may affect bone marrow and blood production. Short-term exposure to high levels of benzene can cause drowsiness, dizziness, unconsciousness, and death. The following commonly asked questions link to resources that provide information about benzene.

Sulphur is just as bad..

http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/chan34.htm#2

Both bad gases, and both present in petrol.. We are doing ourselves and the environment a favour by using a fuel that isn't as harmful to the atomosphere..

Also BP was found to show 98.8RON on average
Audi S3

User avatar
wazza
Top Gear
Posts: 2464
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 1:07 am
Location: Near the Magic Roundabout
Contact:

Re: Optimax vs. Ultimate

Post by wazza » Thu Feb 05, 2004 3:23 pm

Also BP was found to show 98.8RON on average
In Australia?
Paul

User avatar
s8n
3rd Gear
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 12:13 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Optimax vs. Ultimate

Post by s8n » Thu Feb 05, 2004 3:31 pm

Im unsure where the studies were performed..
Audi S3

User avatar
Joules
3rd Gear
Posts: 377
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 6:45 pm
Location: UK Chester
Contact:

Re: Optimax vs. Ultimate

Post by Joules » Sat Feb 07, 2004 1:23 pm

My thoughts on the performance benefits for Optimax were validated mostly after running heavily modded Subaru's. My last a Steve Simpson tuned STiV. There was no doubt that Optimax reduced detonation WRT all other fuels I tried. I could see the difference when hooked into the laptop or with the knock sensor I had permanently fitted.

My choice Optimax...
C63, (C6) RS6 Avant, (C5) RS6 Avant, (B5) RS4 Avant, RS2 Avant, S4, S2, EVO IX 400 BHP

Post Reply

Return to “Audi Tuning and Modifications”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests