Page 1 of 1
first long-trip : range sux
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2003 1:40 pm
by timucin
yestarday i had my longest trip with rs2.first time
roads were quite empty, i drove 900km total. top speed i saw maximum was 280.no problem ,i dont remember going under 220 for all the way. everything was nice except consuption
-full tank gas goes only 260 km. is that normal?.
Re: first long-trip : range sux
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2003 2:04 pm
by Brooner
At that speed i would guess yes [img]images/graemlins/062802drink_prv.gif[/img]
Re: first long-trip : range sux
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2003 3:51 pm
by Jani
How much did you fill up after 260 km? The Autocheck system is quite conservative, and lights the warning too early, if you are driving aggressively. Still, at those speeds, you can't expect more than 300 km range with ~60 litres (tank capacity is 64 litres).
Re: first long-trip : range sux
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:10 pm
by timucin
first fill ; i drived very agressive and went 250 km
second fill : i was staying fuelless in the middle of highway when light apperead,slowed down to reach gas station it was 276 km total.
i wrote 260 kmh as avarage. i know how much i paid but i dont know how much one liter costs-will check this tomorrow and post here.
for long trips you need an extra tank, i go fast pass some cars but when i stop at gas station tehy all pass me again? what is the point of going fast then? [img]images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [img]images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Re: first long-trip : range sux
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:21 pm
by TimJMS
for long trips you need an extra tank, i go fast pass some cars but when i stop at gas station tehy all pass me again? what is the point of going fast then?
I am sure MTM could fit you an additional fuel tank in the rear? They certainly offer this for the RS4.
There is no point in driving fast, its just that the love of speed is an evil disease that requires a regular "fix".
Only very few find a cure [img]images/graemlins/033102bigblink_1_prv.gif[/img]
Re: first long-trip : range sux
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2003 12:35 am
by runrowsam
Only very few find a cure [img]images/graemlins/033102bigblink_1_prv.gif[/img]
It's called a missus. Oooh, or a wallet [img]images/graemlins/spineyes.gif[/img]
Rock on
Sam [img]images/graemlins/thumbs.gif[/img]
Re: first long-trip : range sux
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2003 3:17 am
by timucin
LOL
[img]images/graemlins/1syellow1.gif[/img]
Re: first long-trip : range sux
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2003 8:48 am
by TimJMS
I was thinking of those who discover a velocity that proves to be terminal [img]images/graemlins/033102scull_1_prv.gif[/img] [img]images/graemlins/explode.gif[/img] [img]images/graemlins/jawdrop.gif[/img]
Re: first long-trip : range sux
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2003 9:08 am
by Brooner
LOL [img]images/graemlins/roflmao.gif[/img] [img]images/graemlins/roflmao.gif[/img] [img]images/graemlins/roflmao.gif[/img]
Re: first long-trip : range sux
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 9:59 pm
by robo
I drove to Poland 1700 km each way on 3.5 tanks.
Top speed 230 km/h , avrage speed 150km/h , fuel consumption 14.4 liters for every 100km
Re: first long-trip : range sux
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2004 11:52 pm
by timucin
I drove to Poland 1700 km each way on 3.5 tanks.
Top speed 230 km/h , avrage speed 150km/h , fuel consumption 14.4 liters for every 100km
[img]images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Re: first long-trip : range sux
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2004 2:00 pm
by robo
I had me wife, kid and 200kg of bagage''@@@ [img]images/graemlins/beerchug.gif[/img]
and Happy New Year Every one