Rolling Road Day at QST
-
- 5th Gear
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 9:50 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
- Contact:
yes I agree Ben - something can't be right here surely. How can you only get 50% of your power output at the wheels! I thought the average for 4 wheel drive cars was about 30%?bjacks wrote:I lost loads more than you Simon.
Corrected Power 419.3
Engine Power 431
Wheel Power 206
Drag Power 225
Max Power at 6960RPM
Torque 531.3
Intake temp 9.6C
Ambient temp 9.4C
I think we'd best be ignoring losses as 2 identical cars (on same sized tyres, suspension etc etc) cannot differ that much.
M3 CSL - Silver Grey, a few options.
Its Doug(couldn't remember my password at work)
There is definitely something wrong with your RR measurements. On Audi 4WD Cars you should get 25% to 30% losses.
I do not beleive that you are only putting out 206bhp and 246bhp at the wheels. That is the measured value. The losses should be measured and added to that - that is why the flywheel figures can vary a bit - as it has 2 measured errors.
There is definitely something wrong with your RR measurements. On Audi 4WD Cars you should get 25% to 30% losses.
I do not beleive that you are only putting out 206bhp and 246bhp at the wheels. That is the measured value. The losses should be measured and added to that - that is why the flywheel figures can vary a bit - as it has 2 measured errors.
Funnily enough something I have been looking at.perhaps Prawn knows, or can ask Kim
Mainly due to my 'power at the wheels' figure being 0.5BHP higher than Johns

him on something !
Unless you use an engine Dyno you will always be getting a best guess at Flywheel Power as all Chassis Dyno's (Rolling Roads) read wheel power. What I do know is that the corrected power is calculated by one of several methods, DIN 70020, SAEJ1349, EEC, ECE, ISO, or some other? Depending on which correction factor is used, the results vary, according to conditions. For e.g. DIN 70020 standard often results in "larger" figures than other commonly used formulas. Non of them are actually wrong as such - just different standards. Kims MAHA uses DIN70020, as do most other UK tuners from what I have seen.
The only real measure is Wheel Power, however I am not sure how this is measured or represented in the plots, I will ask Kim if he knows or can find out.
My wheel figures on Saturday where 300.9BHP with a corrected O/P of 477.1BHP which would work out at approx 37% losses.
************
Prawn
Prawn
My wheel figures on Saturday where 300.9BHP with a corrected O/P of 477.1BHP which would work out at approx 37% losses.[/quote]bjacks wrote:
My wheel power was only 206BHP, with losses equating to the power of a standard S3 (225)

That must be total BS. My old S3 had more wheel power than that

A soft tyre, dodgy tracking (errrrmmm!) etc will cause additional losses on top of the normal drivetrain etc.
I've seen up to 55% loss on TT rr days!
B8 A4 Avant quattro
Honda CBR1100XX Super Blackbird
Suzuki GSXR1000 (Track bike)
B6 S4 (AMD Stage 3) - GONE
8N TT (APR/AMD/MTM) - GONE
Honda CBR1100XX Super Blackbird
Suzuki GSXR1000 (Track bike)
B6 S4 (AMD Stage 3) - GONE
8N TT (APR/AMD/MTM) - GONE
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests