Boost Pressure - Specified v Actual & MAF readings
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:53 pm
When looking at a output of others log data, its common to see there is some difference in the Boost pressure specified & actual figures.
Is it quite normal not to have the same numbers for both, and to see a small numerical difference?
If so, what in terms of deviation between these numbers, is acceptable, and at what point does it start to indicate a leak?
Also I presume the numbers will be different depending on state of tune, i.e. Std\remapped.
So are there any working examples of what is normal or good for these figures, for the following examples
1. Std map
2. Stage 1
3. Stage 2
Similarly what kind of readings should for a normal\healthy MAF as well?
Cheers
Is it quite normal not to have the same numbers for both, and to see a small numerical difference?
If so, what in terms of deviation between these numbers, is acceptable, and at what point does it start to indicate a leak?
Also I presume the numbers will be different depending on state of tune, i.e. Std\remapped.
So are there any working examples of what is normal or good for these figures, for the following examples
1. Std map
2. Stage 1
3. Stage 2
Similarly what kind of readings should for a normal\healthy MAF as well?
Cheers