phenolic spacers for the rs4?

2.7 V6 30v biturbo - 380 bhp
andream88
3rd Gear
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 4:33 pm

RE: phenolic spacers for the rs4?

Post by andream88 » Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:35 am

pleasee :P
Rs4 b5 06/2001
custom remap - KW V3 - Hotchkis Sways - ASP DTS with poly mount - 034 Street Mounts + Snub with bracket - Apikol rear diff mount and bushes - Gutted precats - DUH Fmic kit - 360x32 floating discs+brembo 6-pot at the front - 710Ns - OEM 18 Hard wheels - JHM shifter/linkage/spring etc - Podi.ca Boost Gauge - Powerflex Bushes - Afterrun mod -

jc..
3rd Gear
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:43 pm

RE: phenolic spacers for the rs4?

Post by jc.. » Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:33 pm

there is an arguement that by reducing the amount of heat soak from head to IM that you are increasing the heat in the head. I would rather have a head that ran a couple of degrees cooler.
Air also demonstrates laminar flow charateristics creating an insulating boundary layer or slower air while the central core runs at a faster rate.
not flaming the idea, would just rather see someone do a true temp and dyno test before and after

ZKNY
1st Gear
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:15 am
Location: NYC

Re: RE: phenolic spacers for the rs4?

Post by ZKNY » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:24 am

andream88 wrote:Can you tell me wich one i have to buy please?

http://www.034motorsport.com/product_in ... cts_id=982
or
http://www.autospeed.us/store.php?crn=3 ... how_detail

Thank you
dont get either. get them from VAST PERFORMANCE.

the others are bollocks. VAST is a solid 1-piece design, that isnt all cut apart like the other gaskets. the extra cuts weaken the design. furthermore, the Phenolic material VAST uses is more solid, that in conjunction w the 1-piece design makes them less likely to break down.

i have the VAST and ive beat the hell out of mine, and when i recently pulled them out, they were perfect. VAST FTW.

that is all.

http://vastperformance.com/shop/product ... ucts_id=29

User avatar
Chubby
4th Gear
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 8:46 pm
Location: Robin Hood County, UK.

Post by Chubby » Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:00 pm

I have installed some on mine - with ceramic manifolds and some one of ceramic down pipes and its as cool as a cucumber down there (the engine bay that is)

R.

P.S. wll give some feed back on temps when I can get it mapped and running full speed.
RS4 Misano Red (The Fast Colour) - A Few Extras = 550bhp - In Love Again - Now broken - Hate the Bitch... Has to go...

GT-R arriving 14/05/09 - Too many toys - not enough time...

andream88
3rd Gear
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 4:33 pm

Post by andream88 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:22 pm

I talked with some engineers here in Italy, and EVERYONE told me not to buy them.
It's a matter of heat dissipation etc.....

Bye
Rs4 b5 06/2001
custom remap - KW V3 - Hotchkis Sways - ASP DTS with poly mount - 034 Street Mounts + Snub with bracket - Apikol rear diff mount and bushes - Gutted precats - DUH Fmic kit - 360x32 floating discs+brembo 6-pot at the front - 710Ns - OEM 18 Hard wheels - JHM shifter/linkage/spring etc - Podi.ca Boost Gauge - Powerflex Bushes - Afterrun mod -

User avatar
Andiroo
Top Gear
Posts: 2166
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 8:22 pm
Location: Richmond, North Yorkshire

Re: RE: phenolic spacers for the rs4?

Post by Andiroo » Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:39 pm

jc.. wrote:there is an arguement that by reducing the amount of heat soak from head to IM that you are increasing the heat in the head. I would rather have a head that ran a couple of degrees cooler.
Air also demonstrates laminar flow charateristics creating an insulating boundary layer or slower air while the central core runs at a faster rate.
not flaming the idea, would just rather see someone do a true temp and dyno test before and after
I think jc makes a good point here don't you think? :wink:

Heatsoak, or lack of, must make a difference to the heads...... almost equalling out any benefits you may get? Any thoughts guys?

Cheers,

Andiroo
Previous :RS4 B5 (Noggy Babe), 934 GT2, 996 Cup.
WIP :to be advised.....

RS246 Live! CLICK HERE for details of the big RS246 event for 2008 **And how it died on it's arse**

andream88
3rd Gear
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 4:33 pm

RE: Re: RE: phenolic spacers for the rs4?

Post by andream88 » Fri Feb 29, 2008 12:16 am

Yes i agree with you and jc.
In fact i spent that money on the AutoSpeed DTS :D

Bye!!
Rs4 b5 06/2001
custom remap - KW V3 - Hotchkis Sways - ASP DTS with poly mount - 034 Street Mounts + Snub with bracket - Apikol rear diff mount and bushes - Gutted precats - DUH Fmic kit - 360x32 floating discs+brembo 6-pot at the front - 710Ns - OEM 18 Hard wheels - JHM shifter/linkage/spring etc - Podi.ca Boost Gauge - Powerflex Bushes - Afterrun mod -

ZKNY
1st Gear
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:15 am
Location: NYC

Re: RE: phenolic spacers for the rs4?

Post by ZKNY » Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:46 am

Andiroo wrote:
jc.. wrote:there is an arguement that by reducing the amount of heat soak from head to IM that you are increasing the heat in the head. I would rather have a head that ran a couple of degrees cooler.
Air also demonstrates laminar flow charateristics creating an insulating boundary layer or slower air while the central core runs at a faster rate.
not flaming the idea, would just rather see someone do a true temp and dyno test before and after
I think jc makes a good point here don't you think? :wink:

Heatsoak, or lack of, must make a difference to the heads...... almost equalling out any benefits you may get? Any thoughts guys?

Cheers,

Andiroo
where the hell do you YOYO's get your info? the phenolics act as a spacer and lengthens the runners. the longer runner allows the air to cool and sends cooler air into the head -it also send more air into the head.

now tell me, how is COOLER air going to heat up the head?

these have been dyno tested at EPLabs. after multiple hard runs, it kept the car cooler and ran consistently to its hp/tq #'s. i reiterate, multiple HARD RUNS.

also, these were good for ~5hp/tq easily.

that is all.

User avatar
Chubby
4th Gear
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 8:46 pm
Location: Robin Hood County, UK.

Post by Chubby » Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:14 am

I'm afraid I have to agree...

There is far too much heat in the RS4 engine bay - when the car is up to working temp - if you tune the car there is more heat - which is a by product of power - you need to get rid of this heat in a turbo engine otherwise the performance will drop off - as we all know.

Getting the heat away from the induced air is the problem, and anything that helps must be good - hence larger intercoolers, water injection etc etc...

All i can say is that my engine bay now is a lot cooler than before, and I'm getting more bhp - so I am happy with the car set up.

regards,

R.
RS4 Misano Red (The Fast Colour) - A Few Extras = 550bhp - In Love Again - Now broken - Hate the Bitch... Has to go...

GT-R arriving 14/05/09 - Too many toys - not enough time...

andream88
3rd Gear
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 4:33 pm

Post by andream88 » Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:27 am

ZKNY, are you an engineer?
I think you don't.

If you use phenolic spacers, you will block heat dissipation from the HEAD to the intake manifold. And this thing is really dangerous. Cosworth engineers, in their project didn't include modifications like this one. I was suggested to buy a GOOD fmic instead of the phenolic spacers ;)
Moreover, if you decide to buy the phenolic spacers..bring yourself a 5mm type. The 10mm ones are TOO thick.

Bye
Rs4 b5 06/2001
custom remap - KW V3 - Hotchkis Sways - ASP DTS with poly mount - 034 Street Mounts + Snub with bracket - Apikol rear diff mount and bushes - Gutted precats - DUH Fmic kit - 360x32 floating discs+brembo 6-pot at the front - 710Ns - OEM 18 Hard wheels - JHM shifter/linkage/spring etc - Podi.ca Boost Gauge - Powerflex Bushes - Afterrun mod -

S4TAN
Cruising
Posts: 3966
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Planet of the Apes

Post by S4TAN » Fri Feb 29, 2008 11:55 am

This is all good debate, and very interesting (seeing as how I am thinking of putting phenolics on my car) - but I guess we need good old empirical evidence now to settle this one way or the other. Anyone got any?
Deus ex machina

ZKNY
1st Gear
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:15 am
Location: NYC

Post by ZKNY » Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:15 am

S4TAN wrote:This is all good debate, and very interesting (seeing as how I am thinking of putting phenolics on my car) - but I guess we need good old empirical evidence now to settle this one way or the other. Anyone got any?
the evidence is CLEAR. and88 is talkin out of his ass -what he is sayin makes no sense.

pls re-read my post. not only do i know from experience, but others have logged, as well as EPL w the dyno tests. that is all.

ZKNY
1st Gear
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:15 am
Location: NYC

Post by ZKNY » Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:20 am

andream88 wrote:ZKNY, are you an engineer?
I think you don't.

If you use phenolic spacers, you will block heat dissipation from the HEAD to the intake manifold. And this thing is really dangerous. Cosworth engineers, in their project didn't include modifications like this one. I was suggested to buy a GOOD fmic instead of the phenolic spacers ;)
Moreover, if you decide to buy the phenolic spacers..bring yourself a 5mm type. The 10mm ones are TOO thick.

Bye
what the hell are you talking about, LOL!!!

there is no dissipation from the head to the manifold. its the other way around, and that is what PHENOLICS do.. they help cool the air from the intake manifold to the head (i am repeating myself, read my thread -its all there).

the phenolics are a safe bet and add a lil HP. not too many mods that are this simple and add HP/TQ. every little bit helps. if anyone is looking for more air, i have lines to CUSTOM INTAKE MANIFOLDS, you cant find them anywhere in the world.

andream88
3rd Gear
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 4:33 pm

Post by andream88 » Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:34 am

You are really RUDE.

However it doesnt' matter, i won't use phenolic on my car. ;)

ciao!

ZKNY
1st Gear
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:15 am
Location: NYC

Post by ZKNY » Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:01 am

si si... no no!

im not rude, rather... we call it, HARSH... =D

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B5 Typ 8D) 1999-2001”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests