New RS5 - Geneva

[Corkys]

Here we go, just add a boot and bingo.

http://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-germ ... 2017/35885

As predicted engine wise

[DeanoC]

B8 values bolstered right there!

[MikeFish]

I kept saying the new RS4 will get to 62 in 3.9 seconds! Looks like I was right, it'll be the same as this RS5.

[Eddie555]

Here we go, just add a boot and bingo.

http://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-germ ... 2017/35885

As predicted engine wise

2 more doors and I'll be heading to the dealer to order one.

[Urbanpixels]

looks a bit boring if im honest?

[Madelvic]

Going to see it (and other cars) on Monday.

[GrahamS4]

I was a little worried that the facelift RS 3 was the best the Audi stand would have to offer. I should have feared not!

[V8mark]

That is one good looking car.....

[Brooner]

mmmmm not sure about the pictures would look better without all the alu trim imo but Most RS's they look better in the flesh

[RS6chris!]

450 bhp


Poor show Audi

[MikeFish]

450 bhp


Poor show Audi

0-62 in 3.9 seconds. Why do you need more power? And Audi are normally pessimistic with their figures so it is probably more like 480ps and 0-62 in 3.7. Job done.

[doodlebug]

That's pedestrian

[Revolution]

was hoping for 485bhp as a minimum, opportunity missed imho...

massive tuning gains to be had though and should 500+ with a remap

[MikeFish]

was hoping for 485bhp as a minimum

I bet it is really close to that on the dyno.

[RS6chris!]

It will be as slow as a supertanker midrange.

Whether we like it or not it's all about willy waving in the car world...450bhp hasn't moved game on....Merc and Bm will be laughing at this.

RS4 willl be same no doubt?


Old 4 and 5 were "supposed" to be 444?....mind you this one might actually produce power Audi claims...