Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

4.0 V8 40v biturbo TFSI - 553 bhp
4.0 V8 40v biturbo TFSI - 597 bhp (Performance)
User avatar
MartayMcFly
5th Gear
Posts: 1293
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:18 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by MartayMcFly » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:39 pm

I definitely prefer the Akra sound and I'm also firmly in the 'Millteks are too raspy' camp, but I'm not sure how I'm going to get my head around £4.5k EXTRA above the Milly. I'm going to look at custom systems, maybe HMS or JCWeldfab.
2001 8L S3 - sold
2008 8P2 S3 - sold
2007 B7 RS4 - sold
2006 B7 RS4 (supercharged) - sold
2016 C7 RS6 - sold
2015 8V RS3 Stage 3 - sold
2017 Alfa Giulia Quadrifoglio

User avatar
Surrey Sam
Cruising
Posts: 4195
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:34 pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by Surrey Sam » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:47 pm

RS6chris! wrote: Didn't know stainless steel rusted away?
Not all stainless is equal.

One Milltek RS4 exhaust (over priced tat) for your perusal:

Image
Sepang Blue B8 RS4, MY14, All option packs, B&O, Adv Key, Adapt Cruise, Pan Roof, Akrapovic Titanium Exhaust, + more.
Previous - Sprint Blue B7 RS4 Avant, Ceramics, Sunroof, SS+, Buckets, FBSW, Bluetooth, 2010+ RNSe
Previous - Phantom Black B7 RS4 Avant, Black Optics, Titan pack, SS+, Buckets, FBSW

M1R XE
4th Gear
Posts: 534
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:07 am

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by M1R XE » Sun Jan 24, 2016 2:47 am

Agree with Chris 100%. And if you don't want either just get the regal down pipes for the gains and centre section done for sound if needed. :thumbs:

User avatar
A20LEE
4th Gear
Posts: 931
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by A20LEE » Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:09 am

Akrapovic, the milltek sound cheap and tinny. As said above why put a budget exhaust an RS audi?

Chesterfield
2nd Gear
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:41 pm

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by Chesterfield » Sun Jan 24, 2016 5:54 pm

Surrey Sam wrote:Paying for just its name and exhaust note?

The Akraprovic is made from Titanium, not some poor quality stainless steel that rusts away after a few years. That's what you're really paying for, there's probably 3k in just raw materials for the Akraprovic system.
At £12/Kg for pure titanium bullets that would make it a 250kg exhaust system.

It is also entirely possible to have stainless steel which has higher corrosive resistance than titanium and vice versa.

I've not heard either exhaust in the flesh so I wouldn't make any judgments on either personally, but for the price I would want the Akraprovic to be miles ahead of the Miltek to justify it's cost.

Andy_W
2nd Gear
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2016 4:42 pm

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by Andy_W » Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:15 pm

I quite fancy a bit more noise than the OEM sports exhaust but had bad experience with Milltek in the past (RS5) that droned like hell at 4K rpm. Had it taken off in the end. Shame there are no other quality options other than the titanium expense of Akra.. Might just bite the bullet and do it but wish they did normal style tips.

Noyjatat
Top Gear
Posts: 1585
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:12 pm
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by Noyjatat » Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:22 pm

Just spray them after.

User avatar
MikeFish
Cruising
Posts: 15588
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: The Middle of Somewhere

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by MikeFish » Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:13 pm

Andy_W wrote:I quite fancy a bit more noise than the OEM sports exhaust but had bad experience with Milltek in the past (RS5) that droned like hell at 4K rpm. Had it taken off in the end. Shame there are no other quality options other than the titanium expense of Akra.. Might just bite the bullet and do it but wish they did normal style tips.
I thought the tailpipes were a separate bolt on like the OEM ones. I'd imagine you can keep original tips with akra exhaust.
Or get a JC Weldfab exhaust made to look and sound how you like it.

User avatar
W8PMC
Cruising
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:18 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by W8PMC » Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:02 am

Leo-RS wrote:Figures are from MRC,

Stage 1 680-700
Stage 2 740-750

The only difference between Stage 1 and Stage 2 is the full exhaust system. My car has had both Stage 1 and Stage 2 tunes from MRC.

If you follow MRC's Facebook page, you'll find about a dozen examples of C7 Stage 1 vs Stage 2 results.

The C7 exhaust has 4 cats in the system and is very restrictive. The gains from stage 2 come from the downpipes, not the catback section. This is where the Akra system is let down, there's no downpipes upgrade. (I dread to think of the cost if they did offer the full system)

As for the Milltek, yes, although it's not a titanium system, it doesn't need to be. For me, I'll have the car maximum of 3yrs, the stainless steel Milltek will far outlive my ownership. It's very well made and I've not heard of any quality issues personally.

Dont get me wrong, the Akra is 2nd to none build and quality wise, it's just the Milltek offers the performance benefits. )
I'm sure the MRC Stage 2 albeit only has the Milltek as an additional piece of hardware, but they also apply a more aggressive Stage 2 tune which is where most of the uplift comes from. I've no idea what the hardware alone offers up in gains, but I'm sure it's the exhaust & enhanced tune combined that give the extra 50bhp, not the exhaust on its own.
Paul
03 Black AmD Stage3 C5 RS6 Saloon (Sold)
05 Blue DMS E60 M5 (Sold)
07 Blue DMS B7 RS4 Saloon (Sold)
10 White Nissan R35 GT-R Premium Edition SVM Stage 4 (Sold)
12 White D4 A8 TDi SE Executive (Sold)
14 Grey LCi F10 M5 (Rejected)
14 Blue DMS Stage 2 LCi F10 M5 (Sold)
17 Grey FFRR Autobiography (Rejected)
17 Black D4 A8 TDi Black Edition (Sold)
18 White APR Stage 2 Golf R 7.5 Estate

User avatar
MartayMcFly
5th Gear
Posts: 1293
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:18 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by MartayMcFly » Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:31 am

W8PMC wrote:
I'm sure the MRC Stage 2 albeit only has the Milltek as an additional piece of hardware, but they also apply a more aggressive Stage 2 tune which is where most of the uplift comes from. I've no idea what the hardware alone offers up in gains, but I'm sure it's the exhaust & enhanced tune combined that give the extra 50bhp, not the exhaust on its own.
In their stage 2 video, MRC say 591PS and 791Nm for Stage 2 parts and no map, then up to 750PS and 1008Nm mapped (on that particular car anyway).
2001 8L S3 - sold
2008 8P2 S3 - sold
2007 B7 RS4 - sold
2006 B7 RS4 (supercharged) - sold
2016 C7 RS6 - sold
2015 8V RS3 Stage 3 - sold
2017 Alfa Giulia Quadrifoglio

User avatar
W8PMC
Cruising
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:18 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by W8PMC » Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:14 pm

MartayMcFly wrote:
W8PMC wrote:
I'm sure the MRC Stage 2 albeit only has the Milltek as an additional piece of hardware, but they also apply a more aggressive Stage 2 tune which is where most of the uplift comes from. I've no idea what the hardware alone offers up in gains, but I'm sure it's the exhaust & enhanced tune combined that give the extra 50bhp, not the exhaust on its own.
In their stage 2 video, MRC say 591PS and 791Nm for Stage 2 parts and no map, then up to 750PS and 1008Nm mapped (on that particular car anyway).
So that's 25bhp ish from Stage 2 parts only? Still nowhere near 50bhp (unless i'm misunderstanding). What parts are in their Stage 1, just panel filter or is it a cat-back system with Stage 2 including downpipes? Strange they'd offer a non map stage 2 as 25bhp for i guess £2.5k+ is a bit of an ask.
Paul
03 Black AmD Stage3 C5 RS6 Saloon (Sold)
05 Blue DMS E60 M5 (Sold)
07 Blue DMS B7 RS4 Saloon (Sold)
10 White Nissan R35 GT-R Premium Edition SVM Stage 4 (Sold)
12 White D4 A8 TDi SE Executive (Sold)
14 Grey LCi F10 M5 (Rejected)
14 Blue DMS Stage 2 LCi F10 M5 (Sold)
17 Grey FFRR Autobiography (Rejected)
17 Black D4 A8 TDi Black Edition (Sold)
18 White APR Stage 2 Golf R 7.5 Estate

Leo-RS
3rd Gear
Posts: 352
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:48 pm
Location: Dundee / Aberdeen

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by Leo-RS » Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:36 pm

Hi Paul,

You wouldn't fit a full turbo back exhaust to a car and not map it, you would bugger the fuelling and it would likely lose horsepower, not gain it so with that in mind, no, the exhaust alone wont give you 50hp.

What it will do though is give you a 50hp increase over and above a Stage 1 tune.

If you fit the exhaust and get them to Stage 2 tune the car straight away, you'll have in the ballpark around 740-750. If you don't fit the exhaust and get them to carry out a Stage 1 tune, then you will have around 680-700. If you fit the turbo back exhaust to the Stage 1 tune without mapping it, you would more than likely overboost due to running less back pressure from the now less restrictive (or missing) cats. Not sure on the power output but it obviously wouldn't be optimised to 740-750.

All C7's are actually 'Stage 2' tuned from MRC and hence their hefty price tag. This means that they are all fully customised, each car taking a day on the dyno. MRC cannot load in a generic file that worked well on a C7 last week and hope it works on this weeks C7, the C7 is a different beast and from what I hear from the guys at MRC, very unpredictable, each car tunes differently. Stage 1 and Stage 2 is however a good way of determining the state of tune from the car, Stage 1 (software only) Stage 2 (Software + exhaust) - MRC would only charge you dyno time should you go from Stage 1 to Stage 2 as effectively all it is, is a tweak to the existing already fully customised map.
MY16 Audi RS6

User avatar
W8PMC
Cruising
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:18 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by W8PMC » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:31 pm

Leo-RS wrote:Hi Paul,

You wouldn't fit a full turbo back exhaust to a car and not map it, you would bugger the fuelling and it would likely lose horsepower, not gain it so with that in mind, no, the exhaust alone wont give you 50hp.

What it will do though is give you a 50hp increase over and above a Stage 1 tune.

If you fit the exhaust and get them to Stage 2 tune the car straight away, you'll have in the ballpark around 740-750. If you don't fit the exhaust and get them to carry out a Stage 1 tune, then you will have around 680-700. If you fit the turbo back exhaust to the Stage 1 tune without mapping it, you would more than likely overboost due to running less back pressure from the now less restrictive (or missing) cats. Not sure on the power output but it obviously wouldn't be optimised to 740-750.

All C7's are actually 'Stage 2' tuned from MRC and hence their hefty price tag. This means that they are all fully customised, each car taking a day on the dyno. MRC cannot load in a generic file that worked well on a C7 last week and hope it works on this weeks C7, the C7 is a different beast and from what I hear from the guys at MRC, very unpredictable, each car tunes differently. Stage 1 and Stage 2 is however a good way of determining the state of tune from the car, Stage 1 (software only) Stage 2 (Software + exhaust) - MRC would only charge you dyno time should you go from Stage 1 to Stage 2 as effectively all it is, is a tweak to the existing already fully customised map.
Absolutely, but i think the point someone else made was that a Milltek (same as any exhaust really) would not free up 50bhp standalone, it's the tune aspect of the Stage 2 that's freeing up those 50 horses, not the exhaust which at best may offer up 20-30bhp (i'd guess).

Albeit no exhaust involved with my car, but the Stage 2 tune increased power by 60bhp & 100lbsft, had i added any aftermarket exhaust i'd have unlikely gained much as DMS's own car has an Akro & is running slightly less power & torque than mine.
Paul
03 Black AmD Stage3 C5 RS6 Saloon (Sold)
05 Blue DMS E60 M5 (Sold)
07 Blue DMS B7 RS4 Saloon (Sold)
10 White Nissan R35 GT-R Premium Edition SVM Stage 4 (Sold)
12 White D4 A8 TDi SE Executive (Sold)
14 Grey LCi F10 M5 (Rejected)
14 Blue DMS Stage 2 LCi F10 M5 (Sold)
17 Grey FFRR Autobiography (Rejected)
17 Black D4 A8 TDi Black Edition (Sold)
18 White APR Stage 2 Golf R 7.5 Estate

RS6chris!
Cruising
Posts: 3845
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:55 pm
Location: North East(Teesside).

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by RS6chris! » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:03 pm

A20LEE wrote:Akrapovic, the milltek sound cheap and tinny. As said above why put a budget exhaust an RS audi?


Is A Milltek classed as a "budget" exhaust??
Panamera Turbo S e hybrid (again)
RS6 C8 carbon black(merlin)
Panamera Turbo S e hybrid
RS6 C8 launch edition
R8 V10 plus
C7 RS6 PE dynamic pack plus
C7 RS6
Porsche Panamera Turbo
C6 RS6 AVANT
RS4 B7
Golf R32 mk 5
BMW M3 E46
Golf R32 mk 5
Golf GTI mk 5
VW Passat 130d 4 motion
VW bora 150pd
Ford Mondeo Ghia X V6
Ford Focus zetec
Rover 214!!

User avatar
W8PMC
Cruising
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:18 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Akrapovic Vs Milltek exhaust...

Post by W8PMC » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:51 pm

RS6chris! wrote:
A20LEE wrote:Akrapovic, the milltek sound cheap and tinny. As said above why put a budget exhaust an RS audi?


Is A Milltek classed as a "budget" exhaust??
I wouldn't have said so but against an Akra i guess it could be viewed as that.

Had several Millteks on a variety of cars & never felt they were budget quality or price, but then again when i had mine their wasn't quite the selection of exhausts their is now & although Akro probably existed as a company, they certainly weren't a name i recognised or encountered.
Paul
03 Black AmD Stage3 C5 RS6 Saloon (Sold)
05 Blue DMS E60 M5 (Sold)
07 Blue DMS B7 RS4 Saloon (Sold)
10 White Nissan R35 GT-R Premium Edition SVM Stage 4 (Sold)
12 White D4 A8 TDi SE Executive (Sold)
14 Grey LCi F10 M5 (Rejected)
14 Blue DMS Stage 2 LCi F10 M5 (Sold)
17 Grey FFRR Autobiography (Rejected)
17 Black D4 A8 TDi Black Edition (Sold)
18 White APR Stage 2 Golf R 7.5 Estate

Post Reply

Return to “RS6 (C7 Typ 4G) 2013-2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests